As Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead, Its Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-editing Vaccines” Comes to Light – Global Research

as-moderna’s-covid-19-vaccine-takes-the-lead,-its-chief-medical-officer’s-recent-promotion-of-“gene-editing-vaccines”-comes-to-light-–-global-research

22-05-20 08:17:00,

Moderna’s chief medical officer described the company’s products as “hacking the software of life” and permanently altering a person’s genetic code. If Moderna is poised to bring the first COVID-19 vaccine to market, a deeper look at his comments and his employer are warranted.

***

More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc.

Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.” Moderna’s response is odd given that the “study” in question is focused on safety and “is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine,” according to a report in TIME. Notably, none of the study’s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “generally safe.” It is also worth noting that this “safety-focused” study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine’s effects in the very short term.

Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine “shows promising early results” and has presented “encouraging early signs” because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “interim results.” In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci,

 » Lees verder

%d bloggers liken dit: