How We Could Wind Up Banned From Discussing An October Surprise On Social Media This Election

how-we-could-wind-up-banned-from-discussing-an-october-surprise-on-social-media-this-election

15-08-20 04:46:00,

In what it calls an effort to make itself “a more reliable source for election-related news and information,” YouTube has announced  that it will be removing “content that contains hacked information, the disclosure of which may interfere with democratic processes, such as elections and censuses.”

“For example, videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate shared with the intent to interfere in an election,” adds the Google-owned video sharing platform.

🚨IMPORTANT

YOUTUBE just quietly announced they’ll REMOVE “videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate with the intent to interfere in an election” https://t.co/vum1y5c9ER

Remember how Wikileaks changed the game in 2016? Yeah, that’s not allowed anymore. pic.twitter.com/dzt7WsOHKe

— Memelord (@dailydigger19) August 13, 2020

This by itself is an alarming assault on human communication and press freedom. If there is authentic information out there about either of the candidates who are up for the most powerful elected position on the planet, the world is entitled to know about it, regardless of how that information was acquired. Monopolistic tech oligarchs have no business barring us from learning about and discussing that information.

Immensely powerful people should not be permitted to have secrets from the public anyway. The amount of power one has should be directly inverse to the amount of secrecy they are permitted to have. If you’re anywhere near the presidency of the United States of America, the secrecy you are entitled to should be zero.

If a hacker is able to get ahold of accurate information about Donald Trump or Joe Biden, that information is ours. We’re entitled to it. Anyone who tries to obstruct our access to that information is stealing from us. It’s absolutely ridiculous that we have a society where people are permitted to both rule over us and keep secrets from us as it is without government-aligned tech plutocrats silencing our attempts to learn what those secrets might be.

Moreover, no YouTube moderator will be in any position to definitively say whether most information that comes out is hacked. They’d only be able to do what the mass media did with the 2016 WikiLeaks drops and cite unproven assertions by opaque intelligence agencies who have a proven track record of lying,

 » Lees verder

%d bloggers liken dit: