Events of the past few days suggest British journalism â€“ the so-called Fourth Estate â€“ is not what it purports to be: a watchdog monitoring the centers of state power. It is quite the opposite.
The pretensions of the establishment media took a severe battering this month as the defamation trial of Guardian columnist Carole Cadwalladr reached its conclusion and the hacked emails of Paul Mason, a long-time stalwart of the BBC, Channel 4 and the Guardian, were published online.
Both of these celebrated journalists have found themselves outed as recruits â€“ in their differing ways â€“ to a covert information war being waged by Western intelligence agencies.
Had they been honest about it, that collusion might not matter so much. After all, few journalists are as neutral or as dispassionate as the profession likes to pretend. But along with many of their colleagues, Cadwalladr and Mason have broken what should be a core principle of journalism: transparency.
The role of serious journalists is to bring matters of import into the public space for debate and scrutiny. Journalists thinking critically aspire to hold those who wield power â€“ primarily state agencies â€“ to account on the principle that, without scrutiny, power quickly corrupts.
The purpose of real journalism â€“ as opposed to the gossip, entertainment and national-security stenography that usually passes for journalism â€“ is to hit up, not down.