The Year Ahead – Part 2: Biosecurity | Minds

17-01-21 05:30:00,

by James Corbett
January 16, 2021

I don’t need to tell you that we are living through world-historical times right now. The frequency of world-changing events is accelerating even as the impact of these events on our day-to-day lives is increasing.

As Lenin rightly observed: “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.” Perhaps there are years in which centuries happen.

With that in mind, I am taking my annual look at the year ahead and splitting it into three parts.

Last week, I looked at the tectonic shifts that are taking place in the global monetary space and consider what these changes portend for the future of the world economy.

This week, I will examine the ongoing (generated) COVID crisis and what we can expect as the Era of Biosecurity continues to unfold.

Finally, next week I will turn my attention to world geopolitics, analyzing the types of conflicts that we can expect to see over the course of this year and explaining how these conflicts will set the stage for even more dramatic events over the course of the decade.

When Will the Scamdemic End?

There are five main schools of thought about when the scamdemic will end.

The first school holds that the scamdemic will end on January 20th, because that’s when Biden gets installed as the next puppet in the White House (unless Q and the good deep state launch their military coup before then!). But only Americans believe that the events of the past year were all about the American (s)election sideshow circus.

The second school of thought says the scamdemic hype will be gradually ramped down as the vaccines are rolled out. As viewers of the most recent New World Next Week will know, there is now a mechanism in place for the scamdemic scammers to do just this: the PCR tests. You see, the WHO has just “discovered” that RT-PCR tests with a high cycle threshold may be giving false positives, so we are likely to see new guidance for 2021 telling labs around the world to lower the cycle threshold in their PCR tests.

 » Lees verder

Brave New Dystopian World Order Unfolding. Silencing Dissent – Global Research

17-01-21 05:29:00,

Brave new world dystopia is unfolding in plain sight, freedoms as once known fast eroding.

Are they heading for elimination altogether in the West and elsewhere?

Is totalitarian rule enforced by police state harshness becoming the new abnormal?

Is the US land of opportunity/land of the free and home of the brave a distant memory?

Eroding for years, life as once known in the US and West are on a fast track for elimination if not challenged to halt what’s underway.

Seasonal flu/influenza that occurs annually with no mass hysteria fear-mongering, house arrest by lockdowns and quarantines, face masks that harm health instead of protecting it, social distancing and all the rest have done infinitely more harm to most people than any number of illnesses combined.

Renamed (made-in-the-USA) covid, it’s a vehicle for transforming free societies into totalitarian ones — complementing what’s gone on up to now following the US state-sponsored 9/11 mother of all false flags.

What’s happening and hardening is what no one yearning to breathe free should accept.

But it’s going on and advancing, supported by Big Media.

It includes a diabolical scheme to silence dissent by eliminating truth-telling divergence from the falsified official narrative.

America’s Bill of Rights are fast disappearing.

October 2001 Patriot Act legislation trampled on them by greatly eroding the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, 8th and 14th Bill of Rights amendments to the US Constitution.

Calling for Patriot Act 2.0, Biden/Harris want the draconian 2001 law hardened for greater police state control to further weaken/then eliminate a free and open society.

Their stimulus plan calls for nationwide mass-vaxxing with high-risk, experimental, DNA-altering, hazardous to health mRNA vaccines that provide no protection and likely harm to countless numbers of people if taken as directed.

What’s planned includes issuance of digital vaccine passports — an unacceptable Big Brother intrusion into and for control over our lives.

Will they be required ahead for air travel and free movement, along with access to employment, education, and other public places?

Will daily lives and routines no longer be possible without proof of covid immunity — not gotten from vaxxing?

 » Lees verder

Vaccines: “Death by Coincidence”. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Global Research

17-01-21 05:28:00,

The official handling last week of the deaths of two Danes and a Miami doctor following their COVID jabs highlights the gaping holes in the government’s surveillance system for detecting post-marketing vaccine reactions.

These incidents suggest that health officials will be unlikely to give the public authentic risk profiles for the emergency use COVID vaccines.

Accurate risk profiles allow regulators to determine if a medical intervention is causing more harm than good and consumers to make rational choices about their own use of a product.

Regulators usually develop risk assessments during preclinical trials by comparing health outcomes in individuals receiving the intervention against a placebo group. Such studies must be large enough to detect rare injuries and of sufficient duration to reveal ailments with long diagnosis horizons.

The existence of the placebo group makes it difficult to conceal or misattribute injuries. Conversely, the absence of a placebo group in post-vaccination surveillance systems makes it easy for self-interested pharmaceutical and regulatory officials to undercount injuries by attributing them to coincidence.

Coincidence is turning out to be quite lethal to COVID vaccine recipients.

Death by coincidence

Shortly after reporting the Danish deaths and prior to any autopsies, Tanja Eriksen, acting head of Denmark’s Pharmacovigilance Unit, told the Danish newspaper, EkstaBladet, that the Danish Medicines Agency had determined that coincidence probably killed the two Danish citizens whose deaths followed their vaccinations.

One of the deaths was a citizen who had “severe lung disease.” The existence of the comorbidity suggested that the death was therefore coincidental. The second citizen received the vaccine at a “very old age,” and therefore also expired from coincidence.

“When vaccinated in fragile groups, one would expect there to be deaths,” explained Eriksen, using logic seldom applied by health officials to deaths from the COVID-19 virus. “This will happen regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not.”

These simple declarations — that deaths and injuries following vaccination are unrelated coincidences — are becoming a pattern.

On Dec. 20, 2020, World Today News reported the death of an 85-year-old man in Kalmar, Sweden, one day after he received the vaccine.

 » Lees verder

Peer-reviewed Stanford studie vindt geen enkel bewijs dat lockdowns helpen, ook niet in Nederland – Xandernieuws

17-01-21 05:24:00,


Mede auteur is ’s werelds top immunoloog en WHO-adviseur John Ioannidis – Aanwijzingen dat lockdowns averechts werken, en verspreiding juist bevorderen – ‘Als er al voordelen zouden bestaan, dan kunnen ze niet opwegen tegen de talrijke schade door deze agressieve maatregelen’


In een peer-reviewed studie van de prestigieuze Stanford universiteit in Californië wordt geconcludeerd dat er geen enkel bewijs is dat lockdowns en quarantaine helpen om de verspreiding van een virus tegen te gaan. En dus zal het in Nederland, dat één van de 10 onderzochte landen was, komende week met een eventuele avondklok wel net zo gaan als vorig jaar met de mondkapjes: we weten, zeggen en erkennen dat ze niet werken, maar we voeren het toch gewoon in. En waarom? Omdat de corona maatregelen helemaal niets met de volksgezondheid en veiligheid te maken hebben, maar alles met de ‘Great Reset’ van het WEF en ‘Agenda 21/30′ van de VN. Om die agenda’s te realiseren moet de hele bevolking eerst van al zijn rechten, vrijheden en bezittingen worden beroofd. Angst en paniek zaaien over een doorsnee luchtwegvirus, waar 99,8% van de bevolking niet of nauwelijks last van heeft, is daar een perfect middel voor gebleken.

In de studie, waar ook de naam van ’s werelds top immunoloog professor John P.A. Ioannidis* (tevens WHO-adviseur) boven prijkt, worden lockdown- en quarantaine maatregelen samengevat als non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI). De wetenschappers keken in 10 landen, waaronder de VS, Engeland, Frankrijk, Italië, Spanje, Duitsland en Nederland, naar de effecten van het lockdown beleid.

‘Samengevat hebben wij geen sterk bewijs gevonden dat een rol ondersteunt voor meer beperkende NPI’s voor de controle van Covid in begin 2020… In elk land is er geen duidelijk, significant heilzaam effect van meer beperkende NPI’s op de groei van het aantal gevallen.’

(* Ionnadis bevestigde in een officieel WHO rapport in het najaar van 2020 de zeer lage IFR van 0,05% van het coronavirus voor mensen tot 70 jaar, en maximaal 0,23% inclusief ouderen. Daarmee is dit virus niet gevaarlijker dan een seizoensgriep.)

NUL effect; lockdowns kunnen verspreiding zelfs bevorderen

In het onderzoek staat dat het bewijs eerder tégen strengere lockdowns spreekt als gekeken wordt naar de gevolgen in landen waar minder beperkende maatregelen werden getroffen.

 » Lees verder