Tony Blair Suggests Unvaccinated Should Remain Under Lockdown Restrictions

11-06-21 09:19:00, Coronavirus

“Science is not a book that you check out of the library or look up on Wikipedia.”


5 hours ago


11 June, 2021

Steve Watson


Responding to Dr Fauci’s claims earlier this week that any criticism of him equates to an attack on science itself, Tucker Carlson pointed out that with the ‘bizarre’ comments, Fauci “instantly disqualified himself as a scientist.”

“This is a perfect distillation of what we just lived through for the past year and a half,” Carlson asserted, adding “It is bizarre… He imagines that questioning science is attacking science.”

“Science is not a book that you check out of the library or look up on Wikipedia,” Carlson continued, adding “Science is a way of thinking and it begins with deep skepticism about what we think we know. You commit to science when you take nothing for granted, when you ask hard questions.”

The host pointed out that Fauci “imagines that sincere questions are the same as criticism.” 

After charging that Fauci has “weird Louis the Fourteenth tendencies,” Carlson addressed the NIH head directly announcing “You’re a federal bureaucrat. Answer the questions: do masks work? Tell us the truth, where is the study? How do you know they work? That is science, those questions.”

“We commit more science on a talk show in cable news than he does. It’s incredible,” Carlson urged.


President Trump also called out Fauci Thursday:

Latest statement from Donald Trump.

“Dr. Fauci likes to say he’s ‘science,’ when in fact he is merely science fiction!”

Trump calls on China to pay $10 trillion in reparations.

— The First (@TheFirstonTV) June 10, 2021

Fauci exalting himself to be science has a dark undertone, in that he is advocating silencing anyone who dares question his authority, which is exactly what is happening on social media.

As Senator Rand Paul noted Wednesday, Fauci is “an elitist” who believes Americans are not smart enough to make their own decisions about their health.

 » Lees verder

Tony Blair: ‘Inevitable’ GLOBAL Vaccine Passports Should Be Implemented Now

28-01-21 11:30:00,

While Americans are being told by ‘Great Reset’ technocrats that the future is one without private property, Bill Gates and other billionaires have been buying up huge amounts of farmland.

Indeed, Gates is now the biggest owner of farmland in America, according to a Forbes report.

“After years of reports that he was purchasing agricultural land in places like Florida and Washington, The Land Report revealed that Gates, who has a net worth of nearly $121 billion according to Forbes, has built up a massive farmland portfolio spanning 18 states.”

“His largest holdings are in Louisiana (69,071 acres), Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Nebraska (20,588 acres). Additionally, he has a stake in 25,750 acres of transitional land on the west side of Phoenix, Arizona, which is being developed as a new suburb.”

Gates now owns 242,000 acres of farmland across the U.S., mostly “through third-party entities by Cascade Investments, Gates’ personal investment vehicle.”

America’s biggest owner of farmland is now Bill Gates

— Forbes (@Forbes) January 14, 2021

According to Forbes, it is not known what Gates is doing with the land and Cascade Investments refused to comment on the issue.

In terms of individual land owners, Gates is still far behind media mogul John C. Malone, who is in top spot with 2.2 million acres of ranches and forests and CNN founder Ted Turner, who owns 2 million acres of ranch land.

Amazon’s Jeff Bezos is also “investing in land on a large scale,” according to the report.

What billionaire philanthropists and technocrats are acquiring land at an accelerating speed, they appear to be telling the general public that in the future private property will virtually cease to exist.

In his books, World Economic Forum founder and globalist Klaus Schwab makes clear that the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ or ‘The Great Reset’ will lead to the abolition of private property.

That message is echoed on the WEF’s official website, which states, “Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, “our city”. I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes.”


 » Lees verder

UK: Tony Blair Think-Tank Proposes End To Free Speech

13-09-19 07:37:00,

Authored by Judith Bergman via The Gatestone Institute,

  • Disturbingly, the main concern of Blair’s think-tank appears to be the online verbal “hatred” displayed by citizens in response to terrorist attacks — not the actual physical expression of hatred shown in the mass murders of innocent people by terrorists. Terrorist attacks, it would appear, are now supposedly normal, unavoidable incidents that have become part and parcel of UK life.

  • Unlike proscribed groups that are banned for criminal actions such as violence or terrorism, the designation of “hate group” would mainly be prosecuting thought-crimes.

  • Democratic values, however, appear to be the think-tank’s least concern. The proposed law would make the British government the arbiter of accepted speech, especially political speech. Such an extraordinary and radically authoritarian move would render freedom of speech an illusion in the UK.

  • The Home Office would be able to accuse any group it found politically inconvenient of “spreading intolerance” or “aligning with extremist ideologies” — and designate it a “hate group”.

The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change has released a report, Designating Hate: New Policy Responses to Stop Hate Crime, which recommends radical initiatives to tackle “hate” groups, even if they have not committed any kind of violent activity.

The problem, as the think-tank defines it, is “the dangerous nature of hateful groups, including on the far right like Britain First and Generation Identity. But current laws are unable to stop groups that spread hate and division, but do not advocate violence”. The think-tank defines what it sees as one of the main problems with hate crime the following way:

“A steady growth in hate crime has been driven by surges around major events. Often this begins online. Around the 2017 terror attacks in the UK, hate incidents online increased by almost 1,000 per cent, from 4,000 to over 37,500 daily. In the 48-hour period after an event, hate begins to flow offline”.

Specifically, the report mentioned as problematic the rise online in “hate incidents”

 » Lees verder

Tony Blair alweer! | Uitpers

03-09-19 07:15:00,

Tony Blair als vogelverschrikker (foto CC, bron: Flickr)

Tony Blair heeft Jeremy Corbyn opgeroepen het nu niet tot nieuwe verkiezingen te laten komen. Wel, ik heb sinds enkele jaren een eenvoudige stelregel wat de Britse politieke betreft: als Tony Blair zijn mond open doet, dan stinkt het.

Boris Johnson stuurt af op een no deal Brexit per 31 oktober. Om weerbarstige Tories in het gareel te houden dreigt hij, mocht het parlement stokken in de wielen steken, met nieuwe verkiezingen op 14 oktober, enkele dagen voor de Europese Raad van 17 oktober, en een kleine drie weken voor de tot nader order wettelijke datum van de Brexit, 31 oktober dus. Bovendien belooft Johnson dat conservatieve parlementsleden die niet met de regering hebben meegestemd niet aan die verkiezingen kunnen deelnemen. De interne regels van de Conservatieve Partij geven hem die macht. Philip Hammond, onder May nog Minister van Financiën en een tegenstander van Johnson, heeft zijn afdeling al gevraagd zijn kandidatuur in geval van nieuwe verkiezingen te steunen, maar de nationale leiding van de Conservatieven heeft statutair het laatste woord.

Nieuwe verkiezingen lijken geen bluf van Johnson. Hij zou die verkiezingen immers wel eens kunnen winnen, en zo vlak voor 31 oktober een mandaat krijgen voor een no deal Brexit, waarop de EU op 17 oktober dan maar moet antwoorden – nu kunnen ze zich er nog makkelijk vanaf maken door te zeggen dat de bal in het kamp van Johnson ligt -, anders no deal! Heel wat kiezers zijn voorstanders van de Brexit. Dat zijn niet allemaal halve fascisten zoals linkse eurofielen nogal eens suggereren. Bovendien gaat in het Verenigd Koninkrijk elke zetel naar de partij die in dat kiesdistrict de meeste stemmen heeft gehaald (het first-past-the-post systeem). Nigel Farage van de Brexitpartij heeft al aangekondigd hier tactisch op in te zullen spelen: geen kandidaten waar pro-leave conservatieven maar een kleine marge hebben, wel kandidaten waar leave-stemmen van Labour kunnen worden afgesnoept.

Dat alles geeft conservatieve parlementsleden stof tot nadenken. Zij weten ook dat uitstel van de Brexit kan leiden tot afstel, en dat zou voor de Conservatieve Partij neerkomen op een doodvonnis.

Maar het is toch een riskante gok, want er zijn ook veel conservatieve kiezers die een no-deal-scenario niet zien zitten,

 » Lees verder