Covid-19 A Once in a Century Fiasco in the Making – Jeffrey Dach MD

13-07-20 04:08:00,

Covid-19, A Once in a Century Fiasco in the Making

by Jeffrey Dach MD

Back in March at the beginning of the COVID 19 outbreak, the highly respected Stanford Epidemiologist John Ioannidis drew heavy criticism for expressing his view that governments were making decisions without reliable data.  On March 17, 2020, Dr. John Ioannidis writes:

The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.“(1)

The Data Has Accumulated and Dr. John Ioannidis was RIGHT !!

Infection Fatality Rate of ZERO for under 45 yrs of age !!

In a recent interview June 27, 2020, Dr Ioannidis spells out the accumulated data which is now available.  Sadly, he was right all along.  Regarding the infection fatality rate,  remarkably, Dr John Ioannidis says for people younger than age 45, the infection fatality rate is ZERO !!!  And, for people age 45 to 70, the infection fatality rate is probably about 0.05-0.3%, historically similar to other seasonal respiratory viruses.  However, fatality rate for frail nursing home patients may be as high as 25%.

What is the IFR (infection fatality rate) ? Dr. Ioannidis replies:

“0.05% to 1% is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate, with a median of about 0.25%. The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed. For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85. For frail, debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes, it can go up to 25% during major outbreaks in these facilities.”

Draconian Lockdown Consequences: “Financial Crisis, Unrest, and Civil Strife.”

When recently asked about the consequences of the Lockdowns, Dr Ioaninidis said he was saddened that his projections were verified: Dr. Ioannidis replies:

“I feel extremely sad that my predictions were verified. “Major consequences on the economy, society and mental health” have already occurred.

 » Lees verder

It’s No Coincidence The Century Of Total War Coincided With The Century Of Central Banking

02-11-19 08:44:00,

Via The Mises Institute,

[This talk was delivered at the Mises Circle in New York City on September 14, 2012.]

The 20th century was the century of total war. Limitations on the scope of war, built up over many centuries, had already begun to break down in the 19th century, but they were altogether obliterated in the 20th. And of course the sheer amount of resources that centralized states could bring to bear in war, and the terrible new technologies of killing that became available to them, made the 20th a century of almost unimaginable horror.

It isn’t terribly often that people discuss the development of total war in tandem with the development of modern central banking, which — although antecedents existed long before — also came into its own in the 20th century. It’s no surprise that Ron Paul, the man in public life who has done more than anyone to break through the limits of what is permissible to say in polite society about both these things, has also been so insistent that the twin phenomena of war and central banking are linked. “It is no coincidence,” Dr. Paul said, “that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking.”

He added:

If every American taxpayer had to submit an extra five or ten thousand dollars to the IRS this April to pay for the war, I’m quite certain it would end very quickly. The problem is that government finances war by borrowing and printing money, rather than presenting a bill directly in the form of higher taxes. When the costs are obscured, the question of whether any war is worth it becomes distorted.

For the sake of my remarks today I take it as given that Murray Rothbard’s analysis of the true functions of central banking is correct. Rothbard’s books The History of Money and Banking: The Colonial Era Through World War II, The Case Against the FedThe Mystery of Banking, and What Has Government Done to Our Money? provide the logical case and the empirical evidence for this view,

 » Lees verder

A History of the 21st Century – PaulCraigRoberts.org

31-10-19 02:32:00,

A History of the 21st Century

Paul Craig Roberts.

In the 1990s with the Soviet Union collapsed as a result of the communist hardliners’ arrest of Soviet President Gorbachev and Yeltsin serving as Washington’s puppet while Americans and Israelis looted Russia, the neoconservatives called for Washington to overthrow Middle Eastern governments. The neocon scenario for remaking the Middle East was set out prior to the events of September 11, 2001. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/whose-war/

The neoconservatives said that they needed “a new Pearl Harbor” in order to launch wars in the Middle East. The cover story was to bring democracy to the Middle East, but the real purpose was to remove governments in the way of Israeli expansion (https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1932528172/counterpunchmaga).

Israel’s principal target was the water resources in southern Lebanon.  The Israeli Army had tried to occupy southern Lebanon but was sent fleeing back into Israel by the Hezbollah militia.  Israel concluded that it would use their American vassal to overthrow Iraq, Syria, and Iran, the governments that supplied the Hezbollah militia.  Once the American puppet had overthrown the resistance to Israel’s expansion, Hezbollah would have no financial or military backing and could safely be attacked by the Israeli army, a military force good only for killing unarmed Palestinian women and children.

9/11 was their New Pearl Harbor.

General Wesley Clark, a 4-star US general who was Supreme allied Commander of NATO, revealed on television that a mere 10 days after 9/11 he was in the Pentagon and was told by a general who formerly worked under him that the decision had been made to invade Iraq.  This was before any of the alleged and disproven connections between Iraq and 9/11 had emerged from the neoconservatives’ manipulation of America’s presstitute media.

In other words the invasion of Iraq was planned long before 9/11.  It was there all ready for a false flag launch.

Gen. Clark said on TV a few weeks later after the Cheney/Bush Regime was bombing Afghanistan that he again saw his former subordinate in the Pentagon.  The general held up a memo that “describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq,

 » Lees verder

The “Deal of the Century” to Undermine the Palestinians’ Legitimate Rights | New Eastern Outlook

12-07-19 08:19:00,

Peace for Prosperity, the so-called international conference promoted, with great fanfare, by Washington, and the personal brainchild of Senior Presidential Adviser Jared Kushner, started rather ingloriously in Bahrain, and has concluded without any results.

According to its organizers, it was to have launched the initial stage (i.e. the economic programme) of the “Deal of the Century”, developed by the USA and Israel to force the Palestinians into final submission. In developing the Peace for Prosperity plan, the US president’s son-in-law was supported by Jason Greenblatt, Donald Trump’s Special Representative for International Relations, and David Friedman, the US ambassador to Israel.

Other participants in this so-called international conference included a number of businessmen from Persian Gulf nations, Israel and the USA. The conference was addressed by such luminaries as Christine Lagarde, chairwoman of the International Monetary Fund, Tony Blair, the former British Prime Minister, Gianni Infantino, the head of FIFA, and representatives of the World Bank. Saudi Arabia and the UAE sent a number of ministers to the event, Egypt and Jordan, the only countries in the region to have signed a peace agreement with Israel, just sent acting finance ministers, and Europe sent, in the words of one diplomat, speaking to the Economist, “the lowest level of representation that wouldn’t be offensive.”

The Palestinians categorically refused to take part in this get-together in which a group of politicians “solved” all their problems in accordance with an agenda dictated by America and Israel. The Palestinian leadership (the PLO, HAMAS) boycotted the Bahrain conference entirely, and Mahmoud Abbas, the head of the PLO, said that the deal could “go to hell”. In a survey conducted by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, almost 90% of Palestinians refused to support the so-called “Deal of the Century”. And a declaration issued by the UN accuses the White House of trying to sell “a mirage of economic prosperity” which will only perpetuate the Palestinians’ dependence on foreign support.

In a letter to national leaders taking part in the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation meeting in Mecca, the Iranian President Hasan Rouhani described the USA’s so-called “Deal of the Century” to resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine as “… a conspiracy to destroy the Palestinian cause,

 » Lees verder

Trump’s deal of the century – DocP

30-06-19 10:38:00,

Afgelopen week onthulde Jared Kushner in Bahrein na twee jaar voorbereiding Trump’s “deal of the century”: het vredesplan tussen Israël en haar Palestijnse bevolking. Het plan voorziet in economische hulp van $ 50 miljard over een periode van 10 jaar: $ 28 miljard voor de bezette gebieden en de rest voor Jordanië, Egypte en Libanon. Dit bedrag zal worden aangewend voor investeringen in de infrastructuur, huizen bouw en economische ontwikkeling zoals het toerisme. Financiering van dit bedrag zou van de internationale gemeenschap moeten komen, vooral van de golf staten.

Tot op heden heeft niemand enige toezegging voor een bijdrage gedaan. Niet verbazingwekkend omdat Israël deze investeringen zo kan vernietigen, verwijderen of in beslag nemen wat de dagelijkse praktijk is, zoals bijvoorbeeld met zonnepanelen door Nederland gedoneerd is gebeurd, zie https://www.ad.nl/buitenland/israel-geeft-nederlandse-zonnepanelen-terug~a69cbe11/?referrer=https://www.google.com/

Sinds 1948 zijn Palestijnen in Israël van huizen, land, water, grondstoffen, bewegingsvrijheid en burgerrechten beroofd. Hun economie en sociale netwerken zijn voor een groot deel ten gronde gericht. Vervolgens anderen om geld vragen om de volledig rechtelozen in bezet gebied en de vluchtelingen buiten Israël nog een beetje economisch vooruitzicht te bieden. Natuurlijk wel langs het loket van Israël die de kraan open en dicht kan draaien en kan afromen, zoals dat met hulpgeld al jaren het geval is. Het is dan ook met recht deal of the century: voor Israël.

Dit is niet het enige onderdeel van de deal of the century. Het wordt al twee jaar in volle vaart door de regering Trump uitgerold. De erkenning vorig jaar van Jerusalem als ondeelbare hoofdstad van Israël en de verplaatsing van de Amerikaanse ambassade naar die stad. Het ontnemen van de vluchtelingen status van zo’n 5 miljoen Palestijnse vluchtelingen en stopzetting van haar bijdrage aan UNRWA. Sluiting van de Palestijnse vertegenwoordiging in Washington en vertrek uit de UN mensenrechten organisatie omdat het te pro-Palestijns zou zijn. Zie ook: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/logic-humiliation-palestinians-190423123902553.html

Recent de goedkeuring van de annexatie van de bezette Golan hoogte, waar in 1967 130.000 Syriërs zijn verdreven, de gehele bevolking op 7000 Druzen na.

Tegelijkertijd geeft de regering Trump Israël alle ruimte versneld op de bezette Westoever nieuwe nederzettingen te bouwen en bestaande uit te bereiden. De kolonisatie op de Westoever gaat hand in hand met de onteigening, verdrijving uit en verdere inperking van de bewegingsvrijheid van de Palestijnen in grote delen van dit gebied.

 » Lees verder