Hillary Clinton als Kreml-Agentin – Das russische Fernsehen über die anti-russische Hysterie in den USA | Anti-Spiegel

hillary-clinton-als-kreml-agentin-–-das-russische-fernsehen-uber-die-anti-russische-hysterie-in-den-usa-|-anti-spiegel

28-10-19 11:21:00,

Die anti-russische Hysterie in den USA wurde vom russischen Fernsehen am Sonntag in der Sendung „Nachrichten der Woche“ in einem informativen, aber auch sehr ironischen Beitrag auf´s Korn genommen. Da ich dabei herzlich lachen musste, habe ich den Beitrag des russischen Fernsehens übersetzt.

Beginn der Übersetzung:

Am 21. Oktober veröffentlichte Facebook-Gründer Mark Zuckerberg eine Erklärung, die als Bestätigung der Einmischung Russlands in US-Wahlen interpretiert wurde: „Im Rahmen unserer Bemühungen, Einflusskampagnen aus dem Ausland entgegenzuwirken, haben wir vier Netzwerke von Facebook- und Instagram-Accounts gelöscht. Drei von ihnen kommen aus dem Iran, eines aus Russland. In jedem Fall koordinierten sich die Leute hinter diesen Aktionen miteinander und benutzten gefälschte Konten, was der Grund für unseren Schritt war“ sagte Zuckerberg.

Einfach gesagt, hat Zuckerberg keine Beweise für eine Einmischung in US-Wahlen vorgelegt und selbst in diesen Gruppen gab es keine alarmierenden Aussagen über eine Einmischung in US-Angelegenheiten. Feindselig war die Tatsache, dass jemand etwas unter Benutzung falscher Namen geschrieben hat. Aber seien wir ehrlich, das ist in sozialen Netzwerken normal, da geben sich Frauen virtuell als Männer aus und umgekehrt. Das wurde nicht in Russland erfunden. Und was hat Russland und unser angeblicher Einfluss auf die US-Wahlen überhaupt damit zu tun? Das ist Quatsch! Aber die Erklärung an sich ist interessant, weil sie das Ausmaß der Hysterie aufzeigt, die in den Vereinigten Staaten gegenüber Russland herrscht.

Hier ist ein viel aufschlussreicheres Beispiel. Die größte Verfechterin der anti-russischen Hysterie in den Vereinigten Staaten ist natürlich Hillary Clinton. Das ist ihre Herzensangelegenheit. Hillary ist sich zu 100 Prozent sicher, dass sie, wenn Russland sich nicht eingemischt hätte, sicher anstelle von Trump Präsidentin der Vereinigten Staaten geworden wäre. Er hat gewonnen, weil er ein russischer Agent ist. Hillary hat ist besessen von der Idee und ihre eigene Niederlage lässt ihr keine Ruhe.

In einem Interview sagte sie kürzlich: „Eigentlich sollte ein Rückspiel stattfinden. Ich meine, natürlich kann ich ihn wieder schlagen.“

Wie jetzt? Wird Hillary Clinton nächstes Jahr wieder gegen Trump antreten? Später sagte sie, das sei ein Scherz gewesen. Aber das Gesagte bedeutet, dass der Gedanke sie immer noch verfolgt. Und ihre Kandidatur wäre möglich, wenn es nicht zwei andere Frauen gäbe.

Die erste ist Jill Stein. 2016 kandidierte sie als Vertreterin der Grünen für das Präsidentenamt.

 » Lees verder

Complete List Of Clinton Associates Who Allegedly Died Mysteriously Or Committed Suicide Before Testimony

complete-list-of-clinton-associates-who-allegedly-died-mysteriously-or-committed-suicide-before-testimony

12-08-19 07:50:00,

Authored by Jim Hoft via GatewayPundit.com,

On Saturday multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein, the highest profile prisoner in US custody, was found dead in his prison cell in Manhattan.

This occurred the day after two thousand previously sealed court documents involving the Jeffrey Epstein child sex abuse case were released to the public.

The documents described how Bill Clinton held a private party on Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile island.

Clinton made at least 27 times trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane. Most of those flights were with underage girls.

Despite a previous attempt on his life just three weeks ago the prison guards skipped the 30 minute required checks on Epstein’s cell last night.

Early yesterday morning they found him dead.

Jeffrey Epstein is the latest in a long list of Clinton family associates and acquaintances who died mysteriously or committed suicide before their public testimony.

In 2016 CBS Las Vegas posted a list of Bill and Hillary Clinton associates alleged to have died under mysterious circumstances.

Here is that list.

1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder …happened just after she was to go public w:th her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

3 – Vince Foster – Former White House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died.

 » Lees verder

Bill Clinton dürfte aufatmen – Epstein war so freundlich, sich vor Prozessbeginn umzubringen | Anti-Spiegel

bill-clinton-durfte-aufatmen-–-epstein-war-so-freundlich,-sich-vor-prozessbeginn-umzubringen-|-anti-spiegel

11-08-19 08:11:00,

Jeffrey Epstein hat sich in seiner Zelle umgebracht. Der Spiegel hält die verfügbaren Merkwürdigkeiten aber hinter dem Berg.

Der Epstein-Skandal um seinen „Lolita-Express“ interessiert mich nur am Rande. Ich habe im Juli mal dazu recherchiert, weil mich die deutsche Berichterstattung misstrauisch gemacht hatte. Das Ergebnis war nicht überraschend: Die deutschen Medien halten mit den Kernen des Skandals hinter dem Berg, sie versuchen die engen Kontakte von Bill Clinton zu Epstein herunterzuspielen und stattdessen Trump in die Nähe von Epstein zu rücken.

Dabei hat Trump im Gegensatz zu Clinton den Kontakt zu Epstein nicht nur lange vor der ersten Anklage gegen Epstein abgebrochen, sondern es war ausgerechnet Trump, der als einziger Prominenter bei der ersten Anklage gegen Epstein den Anwälten der geschädigten Mädchen Hilfe angeboten hatte. Ich möchte nicht alles wiederholen, was ich vor vier Wochen dazu geschrieben habe. Ich empfehle Ihnen dringend, diesen Artikel zu lesen, bevor Sie hier fortfahren. Auch ich habe das eben nochmal getan, denn obwohl ich ihn selbst geschrieben habe, hatte ich auch nicht mehr alle Details im Kopf.

Wie man es dreht und wendet: Epstein scheint eine ganze Brigade von internationalen A-Prominenten, darunter möglicherweise auch zum Beispiel Bill Clinton, Prinz Andrew und viele andere, in seinem Flugzeug und auf einer Insel in der Karibik mit teilweise minderjährigen Prostituierten versorgt zu haben. Nach seiner Festnahme und der Ankündigung eines öffentlichen Gerichtsprozesses dürften viele dieser Herrschaften unruhig geschlafen haben.

Wie der Zufall es will, habe ich den Fall in letzter Zeit mit einigen Menschen diskutiert, die sich mit dem Fall weit besser auskennen, als ich. Und egal, mit wem ich gesprochen habe, jeder war sich sicher, dass Epstein den Beginn des Prozesses nicht erleben wird. Wenn er angefangen hätte, in der Hoffnung auf Strafminderung auszusagen, dann hätte es wahrscheinlich im Establishment ein Erdbeben gegeben. Meine Gesprächspartner und ich waren uns einig, dass Epstein vor dem Prozess Selbstmord begehen würde. Ein Mord würde zu viel Aufmerksamkeit erregen, ein Selbstmord wäre der Öffentlichkeit leichter zu verkaufen.

Und so ist es heute ja auch gekommen. Und wie schon früher bei dem Fall Epstein, zeigt der Spiegel, dass er lieber so wenig wie möglich berichtet. In einem Artikel heute wird der Selbstmord Epsteins gemeldet, in einem zweiten wird gemeldet, dass das FBI den Tod untersuchen soll.

 » Lees verder

Clinton Era Bosnia War, Precedent to the “War on Terror” | The Vineyard of the Saker

clinton-era-bosnia-war,-precedent-to-the-“war-on-terror”-|-the-vineyard-of-the-saker

31-07-19 05:11:00,

by Stephen Karganovic for OpEdNews:

The “Srebrenica massacre” is the greatest triumph of propaganda to emerge from the Balkan wars…..It is the symbol of Serb ‘evil’ and Bosnian Muslim ‘victimhood’, and the justice of the Western dismantling of Yugoslavia and intervention there at many levels, including a bombing war and colonial occupations of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo.— Edward S. Herman, (R.I.P.).

The dirty details of how the Bosnia war was covertly waged, with massive use of local and foreign proxies, is a dismal and relatively little explored chapter of the Clinton presidency. It will surely not receive objective attention at the Clinton Library, nor will visiting scholars and members of the public generally go away any the wiser about it. But in terms of filth, it is incomparably dirtier than Monica Lewinsky’s soiled skirt.

Clinton’s famous invitation to Izetbegovic to improvise a slaughter “of at least 5,000″* Muslims by the Serbs in order to make American involvement palatable to the US domestic public, as recounted in 1993 by astounded Hakija Meholjic, a member of a Srebrenica delegation visiting Sarajevo, is but the tip of the iceberg. But in a very real sense it does lead to tragic subsequent events, culminating after the fall of Srebrenica to Serbian forces on July 11, 1995 in a prisoner of war massacre. Never mind that the death toll of the massacre was multiplied by propaganda by a factor of at least ten , in that business that is par for the course. Never mind even that the Srebrenica massacre was concocted by murky elements apparently outside the Bosnian Serb army’s legitimate command chain in order to provide cover for Croatia’s ferocious attack on Serbian enclaves and the murder and expulsion of a quarter million of their inhabitants, with Western logistical support and under the expert field direction by “retired” NATO officers.

The really big and only lightly touched upon story of the Bosnian war is that it marks the grand entrance of Western-sponsored Mujahedeen on the global political stage. They played a key role as Western proxies in the early 1980s in Afghanistan and, of course, the blowback from that episode lasts to the present day, but that at least was played out on their home turf.

 » Lees verder

Video: “Clinton Foundation and IS Funded from the Same Sources”: Julian Assange interview with John Pilger – Global Research

video:-“clinton-foundation-and-is-funded-from-the-same-sources”:-julian-assange-interview-with-john-pilger-–-global-research

01-05-19 12:55:00,

Video: “Clinton Foundation and IS Funded from the Same Sources”: Julian Assange interview with John Pilger
An Interview with Julian Assange

This interview was conducted and published in November 2016.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange stated that Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation and the self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIL/ISIS) are funded from the same sources.

He was speaking about the organisation’s latest release of Clinton emails, during an interview on the John Pilger Special show that is to be exclusively broadcast by RT, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.

The interview took place in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where Assange has been residing since August 2012. The footage was released in November 2016

Mandatory Credit: Dartmouth Films

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the
copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]

 » Lees verder

Secret deal between DOJ and Clinton lawyers exposes Deep State corruption (Video)

secret-deal-between-doj-and-clinton-lawyers-exposes-deep-state-corruption-video

20-03-19 01:05:00,

Authored by Major Danny Sjursen (ret.) via AntiWar.com:

There are times when I wish that the United States would just drop the charade and declare itself a global empire.

As a veteran of two imperial wars, a witness to the dark underside of America’s empire-denial, I’ve grown tired of the equivocation and denials from senior policymakers. The U.S. can’t be an empire, we’re told, because – unlike the Brits and Romans – America doesn’t annex territories outright, and our school children don’t color its colonies in red-white-and-blue on cute educational maps.

But this distinction, at root, is rather superficial. Conquest, colonization, and annexation are so 19th century – Washington has moved beyond the overt and engages in the (not-so) subtle modern form of imperialism. America’s empire over the last two decades – under Democrats and Republicans – has used a range of tools: economic, military, political, to topple regimes, instigate coups, and starve “enemy” civilians. Heck, it didn’t even start with 9/11 – bullying foreigners and overturning uncooperative regimes is as American as apple pie.

Still, observing post-9/11, post-Iraq/Afghanistan defeat, Washington play imperialism these days is tragicomically absurd. The emperor has no clothes, folks. Sure, America (for a few more fleeting years) boasts the world’s dominant economy, sure its dotted the globe with a few hundred military bases, and sure it’s military still outspends the next seven competitors combined. Nonetheless, what’s remarkable, what constitutes the real story of 2019, is this: the US empire can’t seem to accomplish anything anymore, can’t seem to bend anybody to its will. It’s almost sad to watch. America, the big-hulking has-been on the block, still struts its stuff, but most of the world simply ignores it.

Make no mistake, Washington isn’t done trying; it’s happy to keep throwing good money (and blood) at bad: to the tune of a cool $6 trillion, 7,000 troop deaths, and 500,000 foreign deaths – including maybe 240,000 civilians. But what’s it all been for? The world is no safer, global terror attacks have only increased, and Uncle Sam just can’t seem to achieve any of its preferred policy goals.

Think on it for a second: Russia and Iran “won” in Syria; the Taliban and Pakistan are about ready to “win” in Afghanistan;

 » Lees verder

How the Clinton machine flooded the FBI with Trump-Russia dirt … until agents bit

how-the-clinton-machine-flooded-the-fbi-with-trump-russia-dirt-until-agents-bit

26-01-19 10:20:00,

When at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That’s what Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonSanders poised to announce presidential campaign: report Transparency advocate group releases trove of hacked Russian documents Arson suspected at DC restaurant associated with ‘Pizzagate’ conspiracy MORE’s machine did in 2016, eventually getting the FBI to bite on an uncorroborated narrative that Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpStone: ‘I’ve never had any discussion’ with Trump about a pardon White House: Trump will move forward on wall ‘with or without’ Dems Pelosi after Stone indictment: ‘What does Putin have on the president’? MORE and Russia were trying to hijack the presidential election.

Between July and October 2016, Clinton-connected lawyers, emissaries and apologists made more than a half-dozen overtures to U.S. officials, each tapping a political connection to get suspect evidence into FBI counterintelligence agents’ hands, according to internal documents and testimonies I reviewed and interviews I conducted.

In each situation, the overture was uninvited. And as the election drew closer, the point of contact moved higher up the FBI chain.

It was, as one of my own FBI sources called it, a “classic case of information saturation” designed to inject political opposition research into a counterintelligence machinery that should have suspected a political dirty trick was underway.

Ex-FBI general counsel James Baker, one of the more senior bureau executives to be targeted, gave a memorable answer when congressional investigators asked how attorney Michael Sussmann from the Perkins Coie law firm, which represented the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party, came to personally deliver him dirt on Trump.

“You’d have to ask him why he decided to pick me,” Baker said last year in testimony that has not yet been released publicly. The FBI’s top lawyer turned over a calendar notation to Congress, indicating that he met Sussmann on Sept. 19, 2016, less than two months before Election Day.

Sussmann’s firm paid Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS opposition-research firm to hire British intelligence operative Christopher Steele to create the now-infamous dossier suggesting Trump and Moscow colluded during the 2016 election.

 » Lees verder

The Clinton Memo That Killed Half a Million People in Syria

the-clinton-memo-that-killed-half-a-million-people-in-syria

12-01-19 02:13:00,

“half the population (of Syria) has been displaced, while the World Bank has estimated total war damage at $226 billion, roughly six years’ income for every Syrian man, woman, and child.”

Note: The following article, published at Consortium News, was taken down hours after it was published today (1/11/19) -RI.

A Hillary Clinton memo that Wikileaks made public in 2016 has not gotten the attention it deserves.

It takes us back to 2012 and the early phase of the Syrian war.

At that point, it was largely an internal affair, although Saudi arms shipments were playing a greater and greater role in bolstering rebel forces.  But once the Obama administration decided in favor of intervention, the conflict was quickly internationalized as thousands of holy warriors flooded in from as far away as western China.

The 1,200-word memo by then-Secretary of State Clinton begins with the subject of Iran, an important patron of Syria.

She dismisses any notion that nuclear talks will stop Iran “from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program—the capability to enrich uranium.”  If it does get the bomb, it goes on, Israel will suffer a strategic setback since it will no longer be able to “respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.” Denied the ability to bomb at will, Israel might leave off secondary targets and strike at the main enemy instead. 

Consequently, Clinton argues that the U.S. should topple the Assad regime so as to weaken Iran and allay the fears of Israel, which has long regarded the Islamic republic as its primary enemy.  As the memo puts it:

“Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.  Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.”

image

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta talks with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, April 18, 2012. (DOD photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo)

This document making the case to arm Syrian rebels may have been largely overlooked because of the dates,

 » Lees verder

Isis and Clinton Foundation are both funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar

Isis and Clinton Foundation are both funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar

13-08-18 08:02:00,

News › People
Julian Assange: Isis and Clinton Foundation are both funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar

‘This is the most significant email in the whole collection’

Click to follow
The Independent Online

Wealthy officials from Qatar and Saudi Arabia who donated money to Hillary Clinton’s charitable foundation also provided financial support to Isis, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has claimed.
In an extended interview at the Ecuadorian embassy in London with documentary maker John Pilger for RT, Mr Assange said the same Saudi and Qatari officials could be seen to be supporting both the Clinton Foundation – founded by Mrs Clinton’s husband Bill – and funding the activities of Isis.

Mr Pilger asked if Mr Assange believed that “this notorious jihadist group, called Isil or Isis, is created largely with money from people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation”

READ MORE

“Yes,” Mr Assange replied.
The WikiLeaks founder pointed to an email exchange between presidential hopeful Ms Clinton and her campaign manager John Podesta, leaked by his organisation last month, which he believes “is the most significant email in the whole collection”.
In the email sent on August 17 2014, Ms Clinton asked Mr Podesta, who at that time worked under president Barack Obama, to help put “pressure” on Qatar and Saudi Arabia regarding the countries’ alleged support for the terrorist group Isis.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/julian-assange-clinton-foundation-isis-same-money-saudi-arabia-qatar-funding-a7397211.html  » Lees verder

Clinton Insiders Reveal ‘Blame Russia’ Plan Hatched ‘Within 24 Hours’ of Election Loss | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

Clinton Insiders Reveal ‘Blame Russia’ Plan Hatched ‘Within 24 Hours’ of Election Loss | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

22-07-18 01:00:00,

Wikileaks’ latest tweet has the potential to destroy the Democrat Party’s narrative the election of 2016 was corrupted by Russian election meddling. The news agency detailed the contents of the book “Shattered” — written by Jonathan Allen — and it makes some damning accusations.

The work details former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s presidential loss to billionaire Donald Trump. Allen, who was and is a correspondent for Bloomberg News, has also written extensively about Congress, national politics, and works as a political analyst on national television news programs.

Wikileaks uploaded a picture from a page of Allen’s new book which destroys the Russian hacking narrative immediately. Wikileaks tweeted,

“New book by ‘Shattered’ by Clinton insiders reveals that “blame Russia” plan was hatched “within twenty-four hours” of the election loss.”

The page uploaded by Wikileaks explains how the Clinton spin machine was set in motion in the minutes following her loss to Trump. Allegedly, John Podesta (Clinton’s campaign manager), collaborated with Robby Mook (fellow member of the Clinton campaign) to make the argument the election was rigged by the Russians — an argument which was put forward when it was revealed in early 2016 the Democratic National Committee’s emails had been hacked.

Building on that narrative, the Clinton camp reportedly put out the notion to members of the media the election was anything but fair. The suggestion was apparently made that “Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

The page uploaded by Wikileaks explains how the Clinton spin machine was set in motion in the minutes following her loss to Trump. Allegedly, John Podesta (Clinton’s campaign manager), collaborated with Robby Mook (fellow member of the Clinton campaign) to make the argument the election was rigged by the Russians — an argument which was put forward when it was revealed in early 2016 the Democratic National Committee’s emails had been hacked.

Building on that narrative, the Clinton camp reportedly put out the notion to members of the media the election was anything but fair. The suggestion was apparently made that “Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

The motivations for doing so are speculative at best.

 » Lees verder

Clinton Foundation- PASS ON TO GET THE WORD OUT! | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda

Clinton Foundation- PASS ON TO GET THE WORD OUT! | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda

13-07-18 06:46:00,

Have you wondered why the Clinton Foundation folded so suddenly after Hillary was no longer in a position of influence? Perhaps this summary will provide some insight?

From their 2014 990 Tax Form; they list 486 employees (line 5)!

It took 486 people who are paid $34.8 million and $91.3 million in fees and expenses, to give away $5.1 MILLION

The real heart of the Clintons can be seen here.  Staggering but not surprising. These figures are from an official copy of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation for the tax year 2014. The copy of the tax return is from the National Center for Charitable Statistics web site http://nccs.urban.org/ . You can obtain the latest tax return on any charitable organization there.

Re-Mind Me
by Ole Dammegard

‘Re-Mind Me’: The manual on how to dissolve the matrix, or how to reach enlightenment,or how to just live a better life.

Here is a simple guide that might help you unlock some of the most profound and deep secrets of your life. It is especially well suited for children, teenagers, adults, old timers and seekers of all ages.

It is a great tool to see if you are aware of what is going on in your life. What is real, and what isn’t? How do you deal with so

called good and bad? It might also help you make your life as easeful, peaceful and useful as possible.

Based on what might be universal truths, this game-manual gives you very valuable inside information that can change your life for the better – if you choose to listen.

Do you want to try out the game – or are you already playing it?

(With foreword by Nalanie Chellaram)

To preview the book click on the thumbnail below: 
 

We’re creating viewer supported news. Become a Patron! Click Here!

The Clinton Foundation:   Number of Employees (line 5) 486

Total revenue (line 12):  $177,804,612.00

Total grants to charity (line 13) $5,160,385.00 (this is less than 3%)

Total expenses of  $91,281,145.00

Expenses include:

Salaries (line 15) $34,838,106.00  (Lois Lerner,

 » Lees verder

Hillary Clinton Outspent Russians 53-1… And Lost

Hillary Clinton Outspent Russians 53-1… And Lost

18-02-18 10:14:00,

The mixed messages from yesterday’s “shocking” indictments of some Russian trolls (while The FBI was busily ignoring potential mass murderers in Florida) need some context to calm the chaotic “told you so” narrative spewing from every orifice of every side in this debacle.

Hillary Clinton spent 53 times more money per month than Russians seeking to influence the 2016 presidential election.

As The Daily Caller’s Amber Athey details, according to reports, the monthly Russian budget for the operation to meddle in the election was $1.2 million. As Peter Hamby pointed out on Twitter, Clinton and supporting PAC Priorities USA spent approximately $800 million in 2016.

Not to diminish how awful this is, but $1.2 million is hardly mindblowing. Hillary Clinton + Priorities USA spent ~$800 million in 2016. https://t.co/CWpV7u8iip

— Peter Hamby (@PeterHamby) February 16, 2018

That means Clinton and her PAC spent about $66 million a month in 2016, a whopping 53 times more money than Russia’s $1.25 million monthly budget.

It’s also worth nothing that not all of the money spent by the Russian operation was used to campaign for President Donald Trump. According to the Mueller indictment released Friday, Russian trolls also supported Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders and even planted seeds for leftist groups like “Blacktivist” and “Woke Blacks.”

After the election, Russians continued to sow division in the United States by riling up “#Resist” groups involved in anti-Trump protests.

But none of that matters… Russians ‘meddled’ – end of story, Adam Schiff will no doubt be popping corks this weekend.

 » Lees verder

Clinton Foundation Uses Unseen Transactions for Influence Peddling

Clinton Foundation Uses Unseen Transactions for Influence Peddling

24-01-18 09:39:00,

Authored by Charles Ortel via Lifezette.com,

Huge, unregulated transnational charities provide unique cover for moving money and other considerations as illegal favors…

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/20180123_clinton.jpg

A friend of mine, Peter Wing, once actually hid an elephant in plain sight at the castle he built with his bare hands from reclaimed materials near Millbrook, New York.

The evolution of the Clinton Foundation since Oct. 23, 1997, proves that gigantic frauds, spread across the globe under the harsh glare of public attention and in the media, are tough to grasp – and tougher still to police.

Who would imagine, for example, that a former president, an aspiring president and a highly educated only child would work together, purposefully gaming controls at supposed “charities,” produce false and misleading public filings, and do so for more than two decades using a bevy of outside professional advisers and world-renowned directors?

Yet close examination of available facts demonstrates the Clinton Foundation and its network of false-front charity “initiatives” and affiliates remains the largest set of unprosecuted charitable frauds in American history.

In a sad sense, international charities are perfect vehicles for such questionable activities. After all, who can check effectively how much money is in truth raised and where discrete portions of these revenues are disbursed in far-flung corners of the world?

And, as you will see, unregulated and unaudited “charities” allow donors to send much more money towards politicians clandestinely than is allowed under national laws concerning political campaigns.

Meanwhile, international charity also provides cover to disguise payoffs that might unlock mining and energy concessions, telecommunications and other licenses, and largesse (grants and subsidized loans, for example) from multilateral organizations, including the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation, among others.

Though such frauds began escalating in 2002, it is helpful to begin examining the thread illustrating the internationalization of the Clinton Foundation in 2009. Note that was during the first year of the Obama presidency.

What really was happening with the Russia “reset” starting in 2009? Large contributions to political campaigns come with strings attached.

Evidence already in the public domain shows that certain Russians found common cause with green investors,

 » Lees verder