The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How To Mislead All Humanity Into Accepting Societal Lock-Downs

the-covid-19-rt-pcr-test:-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-into-accepting-societal-lock-downs

07-11-20 09:42:00,

Authored by Dr. Pascal Sacré via GlobalResearch.ca,

It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!

http://www.zerohedge.com/

Introduction: using a technique to lock down society

All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:

Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.

Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.

RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

In French, it means: Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.

In medicine, we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.

Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.

In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.

We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!

It is a laboratory, molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.

In addition to medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and forensics.

The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory, even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.

Today, since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease-2019), the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases, confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).

These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases, some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.

Official postulate of our managers: positive RT-PCR cases = COVID-19 patients.

This is the starting postulate, the premise of all official propaganda, which justifies all restrictive government measures: isolation,

 » Lees verder

Covid-19 lockdown unrest: Liverpool protesters clash with police and Manchester students tear down ‘prison-like’ fencing (VIDEOS)

covid-19-lockdown-unrest:-liverpool-protesters-clash-with-police-and-manchester-students-tear-down-‘prison-like’-fencing-(videos)

06-11-20 03:16:00,

People in Liverpool and Manchester have taken to the streets after being subjected to tougher coronavirus lockdown restrictions, leading to at least three arrests and 13 fines.

Liverpool was awash with protesters on Thursday night as local residents came together to protest against the government’s Covid-19 restrictions.

The police responded to reports of huge crowds gathering at St George’s Hall in the city center at around 6.30pm. The demonstrators were dispersed but gathered again later in the evening at the Pier Head. 

Three arrests were made and 13 people were fined for their part in the disturbance. Videos also show pepper spray being deployed to neutralize troublemakers at the demonstration. 

One protestor compared the lockdown to the panic created by the millennium bug, which turned out to be unjustified.

“I’m worried about my kids. But what it is, is right, is I got onto this sort of thing, remember the year 2000, ‘millennium bug,’ when they scared the life out of the world for six months? This [is] the same thing. Fear is a great controller. So basically, we’re being controlled using fear,” he told Ruptly, RT’s video agency.

Liverpool was the first city in England to be hit with the highest regional coronavirus restrictions on October 14 but is now subjected to the even stricter measures of the national lockdown until December 2.

Meanwhile, university students in Manchester marched around their Fallowfield campus in protest against the restrictions placed upon their lives, including the erection of a perimeter fence around their halls as a “security measure” to “help avoid the mixing of households.”

In other footage published by Ruptly, students can be seen cheering as the fencing was torn down. 

“There is fencing around the whole outside, we feel like it’s completely unnecessary. It makes it feel like we’re in a prison,” one of the students told the BBC. The university subsequently apologized for putting up the fence and said it would be removed on Friday. 

Many students in Manchester and across the country have been isolating for weeks and have not received face-to-face tutoring, despite paying £9,000 a year for their university education. 

Both cities, Liverpool and Manchester,

 » Lees verder

The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society – Global Research

the-covid-19-rt-pcr-test:-how-to-mislead-all-humanity.-using-a-“test”-to-lock-down-society-–-global-research

05-11-20 02:23:00,

Introduction: using a technique to lock down society

All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:

Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.

Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.

RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

In French, it means: Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.

In medicine, we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.

Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.

In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.

We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!

It is a laboratory, molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.

In addition to medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and forensics.

The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory, even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.

Today, since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease-2019), the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases, confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).

These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases, some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.

Official postulate of our managers: positive RT-PCR cases = COVID-19 patients. [1]

This is the starting postulate, the premise of all official propaganda, which justifies all restrictive government measures: isolation, confinement, quarantine, mandatory masks, color codes by country and travel bans, tracking, social distances in companies, stores and even, even more importantly, in schools [2].

This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments,

 » Lees verder

COVID-19 Tracing Methods: United Nations Special Rapporteur Warns of Danger of “Intrusive Surveillance” – Global Research

covid-19-tracing-methods:-united-nations-special-rapporteur-warns-of-danger-of-“intrusive-surveillance”-–-global-research

04-11-20 01:46:00,

On October 29, 2020, Joseph Cannataci, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy delivered an address to the General Assembly warning that “Widespread use of contact tracing technology to fight the Covid-19 pandemic has led to almost incessant and omnipresent surveillance in some parts of the world.”

Cannataci continued:

“This is a very disturbing trend;  all-pervasive surveillance is no panacea for COVID-19”  According to the news release, he was “concerned about reports of personal and health data being used to exert control over citizens, possibly to little public health effect.”

The UN Secretary-General expressed exactly his own concern that “certain governments or national entities are using the pretext of COVID to increase surveillance and limit the space for dialogue.”

This is an alarming trend,  and the General Assembly’s Third Committee (Human Rights) held an interactive dialogue on 29 October, 2020 with the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy.  The resolution on the right to privacy in the digital age has been adopted by the Third Committee since the sixty-eighth session without a vote.  This year, Brazil and Germany introduced an updated draft, which covers such topics as use of artificial intelligence, spread of misinformation, digital divides, and protection of the right to privacy while developing technological means in response to disasters, epidemics and pandemics (COVID-19).  As of today, this draft has been co-sponsored by more than 40 Member States.

This concern is paramount, as wide-spread, and, indeed, targeted surveillance has been used to terrorize people, a devastating example of which occurred during the McCarthy witch-hunts in the United States. These abuses did not end with McCarthy’s demise, as the FBI continued dictatorial abuse of their powers, keeping under illegal surveillance such public leaders as Martin Luther King, the renowned actress Jean Seberg, and any and all dissidents during the anti-Vietnam war organizations in the USA, and the Sanctuary Movement.  The surveillance and lies spread about the courageous American actress Jean Seberg were tantamount to psychological rape, staggering and criminal violation of all the most intimate spaces of her life.  This violation of her privacy led to her suicide, a goal undoubtedly sought by the Bureau. The FBI was often complicit in murder of both well-known and little-known dissidents,

 » Lees verder

COVID-19 en de belofte van de farmaceutische industrie aan de Amerikaanse bevolking | Stichting Vaccin Vrij

covid-19-en-de-belofte-van-de-farmaceutische-industrie-aan-de-amerikaanse-bevolking-|-stichting-vaccin-vrij

04-11-20 08:48:00,

Het onderstaande artikel is een vertaling van ‘Pharma’s public pledge on COVID-19-vaccines’, dat is gepubliceerd op ‘The Vaccine Reaction’. De farmaceutische industrie doet haar uiterste best om het vertrouwen van de bevolking te winnen.

COVID-19 – een belofte van de farmaceutische industrie aan de Amerikaanse bevolking

Op 8-9-20 ondertekenden negen farmaceutische bedrijven, die aan de ontwikkeling van COVID-19- vaccins werken, een schriftelijke belofte die inhoudt dat zij hun experimentele vaccins niet aan de Food and Drug Administration (FDA) zullen voorleggen tenzij het vaccin zowel veilig als effectief is gebleken in Fase 3 klinische proeven op mensen.1,2,3,4,5

De belofte – die is ondertekend door de CEO’s van AstraZeneca plc, BioNTech SE, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna, Inc., Novavax, Inc, Pfizer Inc. en Sanofi SA – benadrukte het “voortdurende commitment van de bedrijven om potentiële vaccins tegen COVID-19 te ontwikkelen en te testen in overeenstemming met hoge ethische normen en gedegen wetenschappelijke principes”. En ook dat de farmaceutische bedrijven hebben beloofd dat ze “altijd de veiligheid en het welzijn van gevaccineerde personen tot hun hoogste prioriteit zullen maken.”1,2,3,4,5.

De belofte werd slechts twee dagen nadat de resultaten van een CBS Newspeiling van 2.493 geregistreerde kiezers in de V.S. was gepubliceerd, ondertekend. Uit deze peiling blijkt dat 65 procent van de deelnemers sceptisch was over de veiligheid van een COVID-19-vaccin dat dit jaar beschikbaar wordt gesteld vanwege de bezorgdheid over het feit dat het “zonder genoeg testen overhaast wordt ingevoerd”. Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, verwees indirect naar de opiniepeiling (en andere soortgelijke peilingen) als reden voor de belofte. 5,6,7 Bourla zei:

“Met de toenemende publieke bezorgdheid over de processen die we gebruiken om deze vaccins te ontwikkelen, en nog belangrijker de processen die gebruikt zullen worden om de vaccins te evalueren, dachten we dat het van cruciaal belang was om naar buiten te komen om ons commitment te herhalen.”

De CEO’s zeiden dat ze geloven dat de belofte zal helpen om “het vertrouwen van het publiek in het strenge wetenschappelijke en regelgevende proces waarmee de COVID-19 vaccins worden geëvalueerd en uiteindelijk kunnen worden goedgekeurd, te versterken.”1

Het vertrouwen van het publiek in de farmaceutische industrie daalt

Of de belofte zal helpen om de angst voor bijwerkingen bij het publiek weg te nemen is de vraag.

 » Lees verder