Doctors and Scientists Refuse to Take the COVID Vaccine(s) Robert Gorter, MD, PhD

04-05-21 02:07:00,

The Top Four Reasons Why Many People, Doctors, and Scientists Refuse to Take the COVID Vaccine(s)

by

Arjun Walia and Robert Gorter, MD, PhD.

April 2nd, 2021

vACCINE

The Facts:

It is no secret that vaccine hesitancy is at an all-time high. Mainstream media has claimed that this is a result of “anti-vax conspiracy theories” when in reality, there are legitimate concerns not being addressed.

Reflect On:

Why does the mainstream fail to have appropriate conversations about concerns that are being raised about the COVID-19 vaccine? Why do they remain unacknowledged and unaddressed?

When you ask somebody why they are choosing to take the COVID-19 vaccine or why they are wearing a mask, they may respond, “because of science.” The next question to ask is, how many of these people have actually gone through the science of vaccines and whether or not masks may be an effective tool for limiting the spread of COVID-19?

Secrets Revealed:

From what we see, the majority of people receive their information from mainstream media organizations, which are organizations that have strong ties to pharmaceutical corporations and governments, and are known for presenting one perspective that favors a particular agenda while completely ridiculing the others. They sometimes go as far as labeling another perspective as a “conspiracy theory” despite the fact that there is ample, credible evidence to support the claims of that perspective. Do people simply believe things because they feel that everybody else believes them too? What are the social and cultural implications of not being in alignment with the majority?

Due to reliance on a single media source, many people are not shown information and perspectives that tell a different or more complete story, especially when it comes to “controversial” topics. Oftentimes, these topics are avoided using ridicule in place of addressing points brought up from other perspectives. We’ve seen a lot of this with COVID, an unprecedented amount of censorship of science has taken place with regards to all things COVID, and many academics have been speaking up about it for quite some time.

 » Lees verder

Doctors for covid ethics – CommonSenseTV

04-05-21 09:31:00, Doctors for Covid Ethics heeft drie open briefen geschreven aan de European Medicines Agency (EMA) over COVID-19 vaccin gevaren. In deze brieven hebben zij om bewijs gevraagd dat het risico van bloedklontering, inwendige bloedingen en daling van bloedplaatjes uitgesloten zijn in de proeven voorafgaand op het gebruik en de toediening bij mensen.

De brieven zijn gericht aan Emer Cook, directeur van het EMA. Omdat op de eerste brieven geen passend en sluitend antowoord op de vragen, hebben ze op 1 april opnieuw een open brief gestuurd, die ook is bezorgd bij advocaat Reiner Fuellmich, Charles Michel (President of the Council of Europe) en Ursula von der Leyen (President of the European Commission).

Het is een lange brief waarin om opheldring wordt gevraagd door een groep doktoren en wetenschappers over de (on)veiligheid van covid vaccins. Voor wie geen tijd heeft om de hele brief te lezen (wel aan te raden), dit is de conclusie:

Voor alle duidelijkheid: als uw regelgevende instantie niet onmiddellijk haar “noodaanbeveling” van potentieel gevaarlijke, onvoldoende geteste, op genen gebaseerde “vaccins” opschort, terwijl de zaken waarop wij u hebben gewezen naar behoren worden onderzocht, stellen wij hierbij het Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau ervan op de hoogte medeplichtig te zijn aan medische experimenten, in strijd met de Code van Neurenberg, wat derhalve het plegen van misdaden tegen de menselijkheid inhoudt.

Bovendien is het uw onaantastbare plicht als regelgevende instantie om ervoor te zorgen dat alle artsen over de hele wereld ervan op de hoogte worden gebracht dat zij deelnemen aan medische experimenten via “vaccinatie”-programma’s, of zij dit nu bewust of onbewust doen, met alle wettelijke en ethische verplichtingen die een dergelijke betrokkenheid met zich meebrengt.

Er is een Nederlandse vertaling:

Dames en Heren,

VOOR DE DRINGENDE PERSOONLIJKE AANDACHT VAN: EMER COOKE, UITVOEREND DIRECTEUR VAN HET EUROPEES GENEESMIDDELENAGENTSCHAP

Wij bevestigen de ontvangst van uw antwoord van 23 maart op onze brief van 28 februari, waarin we de verzekering zoeken dat de voorzienbare risico’s van op genen gebaseerde COVID-19 “vaccins” waren uitgesloten in dierproeven voorafgaand aan het gebruik bij mensen. Onze bezorgdheid komt voort uit meerdere bewijslijnen, waaronder het feit dat het “spike-eiwit” van SARS-CoV-2 geen passief “docking eiwit” is, maar dat de productie ervan waarschijnlijk via meerdere mechanismen de bloedstolling in gang zet.

Helaas is uw antwoord van 23 maart niet overtuigend en onaanvaardbaar.

 » Lees verder

Re: Do doctors have to have the covid-19 vaccine?

06-04-21 07:58:00,

Dear Editor

I have had more vaccines in my life than most people and come from a place of significant personal and professional experience in relation to this pandemic, having managed a service during the first 2 waves and all the contingencies that go with that.

Nevertheless, what I am currently struggling with is the failure to report the reality of the morbidity caused by our current vaccination program within the health service and staff population. The levels of sickness after vaccination is unprecedented and staff are getting very sick and some with neurological symptoms which is having a huge impact on the health service function. Even the young and healthy are off for days, some for weeks, and some requiring medical treatment. Whole teams are being taken out as they went to get vaccinated together.

Mandatory vaccination in this instance is stupid, unethical and irresponsible when it comes to protecting our staff and public health. We are in the voluntary phase of vaccination, and encouraging staff to take an unlicensed product that is impacting on their immediate health, and I have direct experience of staff contracting Covid AFTER vaccination and probably transmitting it. In fact, it is clearly stated that these vaccine products do not offer immunity or stop transmission. In which case why are we doing it? There is no longitudinal safety data (a couple of months of trial data at best) available and these products are only under emergency licensing. What is to say that there are no longitudinal adverse effects that we may face that may put the entire health sector at risk?

Flu is a massive annual killer, it inundates the health system, it kills young people, the old the comorbid, and yet people can chose whether or not they have that vaccine (which had been around for a long time). And you can list a whole number of other examples of vaccines that are not mandatory and yet they protect against diseases of higher consequence.

Coercion and mandating medical treatments on our staff, of members of the public especially when treatments are still in the experimental phase, are firmly in the realms of a totalitarian Nazi dystopia and fall far outside of our ethical values as the guardians of health.

I and my entire family have had COVID.

 » Lees verder