The Establishment’s Dark Calculus: Peter Kirby and Sarah Westall Talk Chemtrails – Activist Post

the-establishment’s-dark-calculus:-peter-kirby-and-sarah-westall-talk-chemtrails-–-activist-post

22-06-20 10:44:00,

By Activist Post

Activist Post’s resident chemtrail expert Peter Kirby recently talked with Sarah Westall on her show Business Game Changers. Among many topics of discussion, Peter and Sarah explore the establishment’s dark motivations behind the ongoing chemtrail spraying operations. Geophysical warfare, mind and body control, financial market manipulations, Morgellons disease, depopulation and other motivations play into this chemtrail agenda which is designed to exert comprehensive control over our entire society. Please join Sarah and Peter for a little over an hour of riveting conversation.

The interview has been released in two parts. Enjoy!

Part 1:

Part 2:

Sarah Westall is a successful entrepreneur and business executive. Sarah has a computer science and business management systems degree from the College of Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. Sarah is currently a partner at Galex Consulting. Her extensive experience and knowledge in technology, systems engineering, business, and entrepreneurship provides insight and depth unparalleled in the media.

Please subscribe to her newsletter at her website SarahWestall.com

Please support her on Patreon.

Please follow her on Twitter.

Please like her on Facebook.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon. Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, Flote, Minds, Twitter, and HIVE.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

 » Lees verder

Coronavirus: Wie das Establishment davon profitieren könnte | www.konjunktion.info

coronavirus:-wie-das-establishment-davon-profitieren-konnte-|-wwwkonjunktion.info

30-01-20 09:01:00,

Virus - Bildquelle: Pixabay / Monoar; Pixabay LicenseVirus - Bildquelle: Pixabay / Monoar; Pixabay License

Virus – Bildquelle: Pixabay / Monoar; Pixabay License

Ordo ab Chao. Ordnung aus dem Chaos.

Der ehemalige stellvertretende Staatssekretär für internationale Organisationen unter Kennedy und Johnson, Richard N. Gardner, zudem Mitglied der Trilateralen Kommission schrieb in einem Beitrag in der Hauspostille des Council on Foreign Relations, dem Foreign Affairs im April 1974, einen Artikel mit dem Titel “The Hard Road to World Order (Der harte Weg zur Weltordnung)”:

Kurz gesagt, das “Haus der Weltordnung” muss von unten nach oben und nicht von oben nach unten gebaut werden. Es wird wie eine große “dröhnende, summende Verwirrung” aussehen, wenn man William James berühmte Beschreibung der Realität verwendet, aber ein Ende der nationalen Souveränität, die Stück für Stück untergräbt, wird viel mehr bewirken als ein altmodischer Frontalangriff.

(In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.)

FOREIGN AFFAIRS APRIL 1974 – The Hard Road to World Order by Richard N. Gardner – Volume 52 Number 3

(Download PDF)

Die aktuelle Berichterstattung zum Coronavirus, ob nun natürlichen Ursprungs oder durch den Menschen ausgelöst, ist eine “wunderbare Möglichkeit” Gardners Worte Realität werden zu lassen. Zuallererst ist es ein Ablenkungsmanöver par excellence für die Massen. Eine Gesellschaft, die sich einer unbekannten, nicht greifbaren Gefahr ausgesetzt sieht, die zudem tödlich sein kann, lässt alle anderen echten Gefahren des täglichen Lebens als unwichtig erscheinen. Auch die Gefahr des Verlust von Freiheit und Souveränität. Und einen Kollaps der “Blase aller Blasen” bzw. die nachfolgende “Lösung” des vollständigen Zentralismus unter der Herrschaft der Internationalisten/Globalisten/Eliten (IGE).

Der Coronavirus ist im Vergleich zu einer ökonomischen Krise eher eine “kleine Gefahr”. Im Folgenden will ich dies näher erläutern:

Die Falschinformationen bzgl. des Coronaviruses

Es gibt zahlreiche Annahmen und Falschmeldungen,

 » Lees verder

The Establishment Doesn’t Fear Trump, And It Doesn’t Fear Bernie. It Fears You.

the-establishment-doesn’t-fear-trump,-and-it-doesn’t-fear-bernie-it-fears-you.

27-01-20 01:57:00,

During the George W Bush administration it was popular in conspiracy circles to speculate that events might be orchestrated which would allow the Bush family to complete a coup against the US Constitution and hold on to power indefinitely.

Such paranoia and suspicion of government power in the wake of the extraordinary post-9/11 advancements in Orwellian surveillance programs and unprecedented military expansionism were perfectly understandable, but predictions that the younger Bush would not cede power at the end of his second term proved incorrect. In today’s hysterical Trump-centric political environment we now see mainstream voices in mainstream outlets openly advancing the same conspiratorial speculations about the current administration, and those will prove incorrect as well.

What these paranoid presidential prognostications get wrong is not their extreme suspicion of government, but their assumption that America’s real power structures require a certain president to be in place in order to advance depraved totalitarian agendas. As anyone paying attention knows, intense suspicion of the US government is the only sane position that anyone can possibly have; the error is in assuming that there is no mechanism in place to ensure that the same agendas carry forward from one presidential administration to the next.

Schiff dwelling on the fact that Trump departed from the talking points prepared for him by national security officials so he could act “contrary to official US policy,” which is to “deter Russian adventurism.” Glad to know even the president is not permitted to change US policy

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) January 23, 2020

In a sense, the conspiracy theories about a Bush coup were actually correct: the Bush administration didn’t truly end. All of its imperialist, power-serving agendas remained in place and were expanded under the apparent oversight of the following administration. The same thing happened after the Obama administration, and the same thing–whether in 2021 or 2025–will happen after the Trump administration. The disturbing fact of the matter is that if you ignore election dates and just look at the numbers and raw data of US government behavior over the years, you can’t really tell who is president or which political party is in power at any given point in time.

The mechanism which ensures the perpetuation of the same policies from administration to administration used to be referred to by analysts as the “deep state”,

 » Lees verder

Establishment Pundits Go Nuts Over New Russian Hacking Conspiracy

establishment-pundits-go-nuts-over-new-russian-hacking-conspiracy

14-01-20 09:25:00,

The New York Times reports that GRU operatives launched a successful “phishing attack” on the Ukrainian gas company at the heart of scandalous allegations about Joe Biden, and establishment pundits are falling all over themselves to tweet the hottest take on this exciting new Russia conspiracy.

The story itself fails the smell test on a number of fronts. It falsely claims that allegations of Biden’s corrupt dealings with Ukrainian officials as vice president have been “discredited”, and its only named source is a cybersecurity firm with foundational ties to the NSA and to Crowdstrike, which you may remember as the extremely shady Atlantic Council-tied company at the heart of the plot hole-riddled 2016 Russia hacking narrative (whose founder is now a billionaire).

The article also of course lacks any hard evidence for its claims, and is of course completely silent on any details as to how the security firm knows that the alleged hackers were both (A) Russian and (B) tied to the Russian government. This is par for course with mass media news reporting on anything negative about Russia, where all journalistic standards have gone out the window and nobody suffers any professional consequences for even the most egregious misreporting on that nation.

And, naturally, liberal pundits are guzzling it down like Mike Pompeo left alone at the table with the gravy boat.

Thanks to editor of another establishment “news” organization for being so mindblowingly & transparently corrupt that even I can see through you.

Here our establishment errand boy warns that any true information about Joe & Hunter Biden’s corruption is Russian Disinformation https://t.co/YF3oLnScSd

— Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) January 14, 2020

I don’t know if you’ve ever seen a man trying to run with an erection, but FYI it’s the most ridiculous-looking thing you can possibly ever witness. And the mad scramble of conservative Democrats to say something viral about this new angle on an entirely exhausted theme puts one in the mind of a whole platoon of men running completely tumescent at full sprint.

“I hope my fellow editors will think hard — really hard,

 » Lees verder

Democratic establishment & MSM panic as Sanders surges into the lead in primary polls. Who’s worse, him or Trump?

democratic-establishment-&-msm-panic-as-sanders-surges-into-the-lead-in-primary-polls.-who’s-worse,-him-or-trump?

13-01-20 06:22:00,

The US political and media establishment is belatedly lashing out at “democratic socialist” presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders, who has taken the lead in polls by laying into the Democratic Party elite’s bland corporate centrism.

Democrats had better attack Sanders before it’s too late!” Monday’s Daily Beast headline may be hyperbole, but it accurately expressed the mood of the party’s centrist establishment. Independent Vermont Senator Sanders is running for president as a Democrat, and has promised to back the Democratic nominee should he fail to secure the top prize. But that’s cold comfort to the party elite, who are beginning to worry after a poll published on Monday showed the unabashed leftist in first place in Iowa, with less than a month to go before that state holds its influential caucus. Nor is that the only state Sanders appears poised to win.

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren – who has tried to position her campaign as a more moderate, pragmatic version of Sanders’ progressive platform – has charged to the party’s rescue, latching onto a fundraising script allegedly used by the Sanders campaign that described her supporters as “highly educated, more affluent people.” Portraying her constituents thus equates to “trashing her,” she told reporters when confronted with the script on Sunday. Warren then went on to use it as the basis of a fundraising email pleading for “unity.”

Such a dumb controversy. In a new fundraising email, multi-millionaire fmr. Harvard law professor/renowned academic Elizabeth Warren claims her campaign is being smeared by Sanders volunteers noting that her base are generally more affluent and educated than the VT Senator’s. pic.twitter.com/PiKfiQbqPc

— Walker Bragman (@WalkerBragman) January 13, 2020

While Warren condemned Sanders for injecting “factionalism” into the contest, statistics don’t lie – she is more popular among the “educated and rich,” while Sanders enjoys more support among poorer voters and those without a college education.

Only in the rarefied climate of the Democratic primary would “educated and rich” even be considered an insult – the fundraising email sent by a campaign staffer for Harvard professor Warren even insisted that the phrase “doesn’t describe me or many of the passionate volunteers and organizers I know.” But 2020 is not a normal election,

 » Lees verder

Establishment Journalists Call For Big Tech To CENSOR Everyone Else

establishment-journalists-call-for-big-tech-to-censor-everyone-else

23-12-19 04:31:00,

In a major threat to what’s left of press freedom, establishment journalists are calling for Big Tech to censor those who won’t parrot the government-approved official narrative. Journalist Sulome Anderson has publically called for censorship of a site because it’s an independent news source.

Anderson publicly requested that Google de-rank the independent news site The Grayzone. Anderson, who, according to her bio on her Twitter page, has published with news outlets such as The Washington PostNewsweekNew York Magazine, and Foreign Policy, labeled a recent article by Grayzone contributor Rania Khalek as “dangerous”. For her part, Khalek called Anderson’s comments to Google a “dangerous threat to press freedom.”

Khalek’s article, which Anderson specifically took aim at, is part of a two-piece investigation into alleged U.S. and Gulf states attempts to co-opt and influence the ongoing anti-corruption protests in Lebanon, according to Sputnik News.

Khalek writes that:

“By joining the roadblocks around Beirut, the protesters have inadvertently allowed themselves to be used by these US-allied parties. Whether they know it or not, the media-friendly artists and students at the ring road in downtown Beirut have given cover to the Lebanese Forces roadblocks in the north and the [Progressive Socialist Party] and Future Party roadblocks in the south.”

Who decides which protests are worthy/unworthy? And why?

It’s all about location!

Protest against a government the US hates and you’ll get the hero treatment in US media.

But protest against a US ally and you’re a rioter.

Watch my handy guide: pic.twitter.com/KDaCe2rbhA

— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) November 15, 2019

Anderson lashed out against the article, calling The Grayzone a “conspiracy theorist website” worth of Google’s power-hungry censorship:

“It’s Not a Conspiracy Theory… It Is Happening Right Now”

Can someone tell me why this piece on a conspiracy theorist website written by a woman who parachuted into Beirut to spread sectarian propaganda and now pretends to be native shows up on the first page of a @Google news search about the #LebanonProtests?

 » Lees verder

Establishment Journalists Call For Big Tech To CENSOR Everyone Else – Activist Post

establishment-journalists-call-for-big-tech-to-censor-everyone-else-–-activist-post

18-12-19 08:19:00,

By Mac Slavo

In a major threat to what’s left of press freedom, establishment journalists are calling for Big Tech to censor those who won’t parrot the government-approved official narrative. Journalist Sulome Anderson has publicly called for censorship of a site because it’s an independent news source.

Anderson publicly requested that Google de-rank the independent news site The Grayzone. Anderson, who, according to her bio on her Twitter page, has published with news outlets such as The Washington PostNewsweekNew York Magazine, and Foreign Policy, labeled a recent article by Grayzone contributor Rania Khalek as “dangerous”. For her part, Khalek called Anderson’s comments to Google a “dangerous threat to press freedom.”

Khalek’s article, which Anderson specifically took aim at, is part of a two-piece investigation into alleged U.S. and Gulf states attempts to co-opt and influence the ongoing anti-corruption protests in Lebanon, according to Sputnik News.

Khalek writes that:

By joining the roadblocks around Beirut, the protesters have inadvertently allowed themselves to be used by these US-allied parties. Whether they know it or not, the media-friendly artists and students at the ring road in downtown Beirut have given cover to the Lebanese Forces roadblocks in the north and the [Progressive Socialist Party] and Future Party roadblocks in the south.

Who decides which protests are worthy/unworthy? And why?

It’s all about location!

Protest against a government the US hates and you’ll get the hero treatment in US media.

But protest against a US ally and you’re a rioter.

Watch my handy guide: pic.twitter.com/KDaCe2rbhA

— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) November 15, 2019

Anderson lashed out against the article, calling The Grayzone a “conspiracy theorist website” worthy of Google’s power-hungry censorship:

“It’s Not a Conspiracy Theory… It Is Happening Right Now”

Can someone tell me why this piece on a conspiracy theorist website written by a woman who parachuted into Beirut to spread sectarian propaganda and now pretends to be native shows up on the first page of a @Google news search about the #LebanonProtests?

 » Lees verder

Democratic establishment belatedly embraces ‘whistleblowers’…but only the ‘safe’ kind

democratic-establishment-belatedly-embraces-‘whistleblowers’…but-only-the-‘safe’-kind

01-10-19 08:06:00,

MoveOn, a major advocacy group fine-tuned to the needs of Democratic Party, has finally found a whistleblower it can support – the CIA agent whose complaint triggered an impeachment inquiry against US President Donald Trump.

MoveOn, which describes itself as the largest independent progressive advocacy group in the US, hailed the still-anonymous whistleblower for taking on “great personal risk to defend our democracy” by revealing Trump’s call with Ukraine that this person only knew of second-hand.

The organization, sponsored by many Democratic donors including billionaire George Soros, implored its millions of members to “have the whistleblower’s back” with donations and petition signatures. MoveOn has even partnered with Whistleblower Aid – a group that steadfastly opposes the release of classified information, equating such leaks with criminality – and thus foisted a warped definition of whistleblowing on its massive audience, one which permits only “safe” disclosures unlikely to ruffle establishment feathers.

Also on rt.com
‘I deserve to meet my accuser!’ Trump wants both Ukrainegate ‘whistleblower’ and his SOURCE to face him

MoveOn’s decision to support the Trump whistleblower is what one might expect from a progressive organization as determined as any to push the president out the door. But MoveOn has conspicuously avoided supporting national security whistleblowers in the past, including individuals who paid dearly for coming forward. Its sudden change of heart reeks of ulterior motives to those who have advocated for those whistleblowers for years. 

A pro-whistleblower organization might be expected to put out petitions in support of military intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who is back in jail over refusing to testify against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange – despite having her sentence commuted by President Barack Obama – or raise money to support former CIA agents John Kiriakou and James Sterling, who both spent time in prison for blowing the whistle. 

Also on rt.com
Intelligence act will protect CIA agents who ‘commit war crimes,’ whistleblower Kiriakou tells RT

In fact, journalist and activist Norman Solomon had actually suggested to MoveOn that they take up Sterling’s case in December 2015, after the whistleblower was sentenced to prison,

 » Lees verder

Establishment rattled? Corbyn urges probe into report he’s ‘too frail’ to be UK PM

establishment-rattled?-corbyn-urges-probe-into-report-he’s-‘too-frail’-to-be-uk-pm

02-07-19 10:51:00,

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has called for a “speedy and thorough independent investigation” into reported claims by senior members of the UK civil service that he is “too frail” to be prime minister.

In a letter to the cabinet secretary, Mark Sedwill, who heads the civil service, Corbyn claimed the matter had “undermined confidence in the principle of civil service neutrality.” He insisted that such discussions “based on false assumptions” should not be taking place.

The Labour leader posted his letter online, hitting out at “the establishment,” which is fearful of a party that would “redistribute wealth and power.”

There must be a thorough and independent investigation into senior civil servants trying to undermine the next Labour government.

The establishment, worried about our plans to redistribute wealth and power, is stepping up its attacks. Our movement stands together. pic.twitter.com/JpeSZJSbLp

— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) July 2, 2019

The Times reported on Friday that it had been told by senior civil servants that they were becoming increasingly worried about the health of Corbyn. They cast doubts on his suitability for PM because he was not up to the job “physically or mentally.”

The report drew an angry response from Labour officials who rejected the comments, claiming that they were a “scurrilous” attempt to undermine the party’s attempt to gain power.

READ MORE: Corbyn says any new Brexit deal should require a new vote, hinting at Labour ‘remain’ swing

It also prompted a defiant reaction from Corbyn supporters on social media, who suggested the Rupert Murdoch-owned media were trying desperately to prevent the Labour leader from taking office.

Jeremy Corbyn is too frail to be Prime Minister. I know this to be true because a Rupert Murdoch paper told me on its front page & they would never lie. pic.twitter.com/oEwyFdRTyZ

— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) June 28, 2019

According to the Labour Party, Sedwill wrote to Corbyn on Monday night in an unpublished letter, to express his concerns at the Times’ article and promised to investigate the matter.

Think your friends would be interested?

 » Lees verder

Establishment Narrative Managers Struggle With New Syria Plot Holes

establishment-narrative-managers-struggle-with-new-syria-plot-holes

21-05-19 09:53:00,

It has been about a week since the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a leaked internal document from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) investigation into an alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria last year. The document, whose authenticity the OPCW has confirmed, contends that the official story which was used to justify an air strike by the US, UK and France about poison gas being dropped on civilians from Syrian government helicopters is scientifically implausible, saying “In summary, observations at the scene of the two locations, together with subsequent analysis, suggest that there is a higher probability that both cylinders were manually placed at those two locations rather than being delivered from aircraft.”

The document, titled “Engineering Assessment of Two Cylinders Observed at the Douma Incident”, was signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. The OPCW hid this information from the public, for reasons it has yet to attempt to justify.

The fact that a longtime OPCW-trained investigator wildly dissented with the OPCW’s official conclusions within the OPCW’s own investigation should obviously have been made public knowledge, and this revelation should obviously have made headline news throughout the western media. Instead, it’s been completely ignored. Only a few alternative media outlets and the usual Russian publications have covered it.

“According to ProQuest database, [Peter] Hitchens’ piece is the only mention in any UK corporate newspaper so far,” tweeted media analysis site Media Lens yesterday.

According to ProQuest database, Hitchens’ piece is the only mention in any UK corporate newspaper so far. Impressive discipline. https://t.co/iNcmO0pnVd https://t.co/9htN2h8hFC

— Media Lens (@medialens) May 20, 2019

So there’s a total media blackout on this story from the usual plutocratic news outlets, which is a huge story in and of itself. Just as significantly, the less well-known propagandists who are typically the first to attack any argument which casts doubt on the “Assad is a child-gassing monster who must be stopped at all cost” imperial narrative have been incredibly feeble in their attempts to dispute this new revelation.

 » Lees verder

Finanzsystem: Wird das Establishment die US-Wirtschaft für seine “Neue Weltordnung” opfern? | www.konjunktion.info

finanzsystem-wird-das-establishment-die-us-wirtschaft-fur-seine-8220neue-weltordnung8221-opfern-wwwkonjunktion.info

21-01-19 11:47:00,

US-Dollar - Bildquelle: Pixabay / geralt; Pixabay LicenseUS-Dollar - Bildquelle: Pixabay / geralt; Pixabay License

US-Dollar – Bildquelle: Pixabay / geralt; Pixabay License

Handel ist ein elementarer Bestandteil unserer Gesellschaft und unseres Überlebens. Niemand kann alles produzieren oder jede Dienstleistung selber erbringen, die er für das eigene Überleben benötigt. Ausnahme mag der Eremit sein, der alles aus seinem eigenem Garten und Wald erwirtschaftet, jedoch dabei auf jedweden Fortschritt freiwillig verzichtet. Alle anderen brauchen ein funktionierendes Netzwerk von “Zulieferern”. Fast die gesamte Geschichte der Menschheit und der Gesellschaft basiert auf der Güterproduktion und das Wirtschaften per se. Alle anderen Elemente waren zweitrangig.

An einem bestimmten Punkt, während der Handel wächst und sich verstärkt, begibt sich jede Gesellschaft auf die Suche nach einer Möglichkeit die geschaffenen Werte aufzubewahren. Etwas, das die Arbeitszeit und die Anstrengungen einer Person repräsentiert. Manchmal wird ein solches Gut innerhalb einer Tauschgemeinschaft universell akzeptiert, manchmal wird es sehr geschätzt, weil man es in den Händen halten kann und es sich nicht künstlich replizieren lässt. Sprich Edelmetalle.

Daraus ist das “Konzept des Geldes” entstanden und für Tausende an Jahren hat dieses Konzept mehr oder weniger gut funktioniert. Unglücklicherweise gibt es in unserer Welt Menschen, die die Ökonomie als ein Werkzeug betrachten, um andere und etwas zu kontrollieren. Sie sehen die Wirtschaft nicht als lebenden Prozess, der sich “natürlich” – also ohne Einfluss von irgendjemand – “entwickeln” sollte.

Die Idee des “Fiat-Geldes” – Geld, das keinen intrinsischen Wert besitzt und das ohne großen Aufwand von einer zentralen Stelle oder Autorität erzeugt werden kann – ist aber im Großen und Ganzen etwas Neues.Es ist die “Bastardisierung” des ursprünglichen und weit stabileren Geldsystems, das zuvor existierte und auf harten Vermögenswerten beruhte. Zwar wird behauptet das dieses neue Geldsystem ein “liquideres Vermögensaufbewahrungsmittel” sei, aber die Wahrheit ist, dass es in keinsterweise ein solches Vermögensaufbewahrungsmittel ist.

Die Kräfte hinter dem Fiat-Geld, die Zentralbanken und Internationalisten/Globalisten/Eliten (IGE), setzen auf eine immer größere Verschuldung, um ihr Fiat-System zu stützen. Zudem dient ihnen die versteckte Steuer namens Inflation als Stützelement. Wenn Zentralbanker von Geld sprechen, ist es nicht mehr länger der Gegenwert von harter Arbeit und damit von Wert, vielmehr ist es ein System der Versklavung, das unsere Fähigkeit zerstört, effektiv Dinge zu produzieren und es verhindert,

 » Lees verder

Fact-Checking the Establishment’s “Fact-Checkers”: How the “Fake News” Story Is Fake News – Global Research

fact-checking-the-establishments-fact-checkers-how-the-fake-news-story-is-fake-news-8211-global-research

29-10-18 10:57:00,

It would be an understatement to say that during U.S. President Donald Trump’s term in office, the issue of truth and falsehoods has been a central topic of political discourse. It was a reoccurring issue throughout the 2016 election and has only continued following his unlikely triumph. While naïve liberals who fetishize Trump would have us believe he is the first political figure to ever lie routinely, the real radical departure of the numerous false statements that seemed to propel, rather than hinder, his success was their lack of refinement and unpredictability.

Shortly after Trump took the oath of office, campaign manager Kellyanne Conway infamously used the phrase “alternative facts” while defending Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s dispute of the attendance drop at the inauguration ceremony from predecessor Barack Obama. The low-hanging fruit of Conway’s remarks were widely interpreted as an instance of ‘Orwellian doublespeak’, but the kernel of truth in them was missed by the self-styled ‘respectable’ media of the establishment who hide behind a guise of objectivity and self-appointed expertise while positioning themselves as omniscient arbiters of truth. Spicer’s claim was indeed an obvious lie, yet the general accuracy of Conway’s point was that what one considers ‘factual’ often comes down to worldview.

For the U.S. political establishment, there is only one acceptable worldview. The terrifying significance of Trump’s victory, which defied their so-called expert polling and turned the New York Times forecast needle 180-degrees, is that the propaganda arm of mainstream media has become irrelevant and the American political system is collapsing. Hillary Clinton’s defeat was the culmination of a steady, inevitable process as evening news audiences have been shrinking for years while print media has approached near obsolescence. Simultaneously, more and more people are turning to alternative sources for news and information, albeit some of it unfortunate.

The introduction of the term “fake news” into the political lexicon has been deliberate and is a desperate attempt by the establishment to maintain its grip on the flow of knowledge. It was strategically re-appropriated by Trump himself, who frequently accuses mainstream media of reporting misinformation. Unfortunately, what he deems “fake news” is merely that which undermines him politically or personally, but there is a truth at the core of his crude attacks on the press.

 » Lees verder

The Establishment Strikes Back | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

The Establishment Strikes Back | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

19-07-18 03:26:00,

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above 

There are a number of elements in the recent release of an indictment of twelve named alleged Russian military intelligence GRU officers by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein looking into possible ties between Moscow and the Trump Administration that I find either implausible or even incoherent. But before considering that, it is necessary to consider the context of the announcement.

The Department of Justice, which had, based on evidence already revealed, actually interfered in the 2016 election more that Moscow could possibly have done, continued in that proud tradition by releasing the indictment three days before President Donald Trump was due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Helsinki Summit between the two leaders was critically important to anyone interested in preserving the planet Earth as we know it and there was no reason at all to release a non-time sensitive document that was clearly intended to cast a shadow over the proceedings. In fact, the surfacing of the indictment might easily be explained as a deliberate attempt by a politicized Justice Department and Special Counsel Robert Mueller to torpedo President Trump over concerns that he might actually come to some understanding with Putin.

The 30-page long indictment is full of painstaking details about alleged Russian involvement but it makes numerous assertions that the reader is required to accept on faith because there is little or no evidence provided to back up the claims and the claims themselves could be false trails set up by any number of hostile intelligence services to implicate Moscow. From an intelligence officer’s point of view, there are even some significant areas where operational implausibility completely undermines the case being made.

The indictment identifies by name and position the twelve alleged GRU officers who “knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other, and with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury (collectively the ‘Conspirators’), to gain unauthorized access (to ‘hack’) into the computers of US persons and entities involved in the 2016 US presidential election, steal documents from those computers, and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election.”

All twelve alleged GRU officers are described in detail, together with the cover mechanisms they reportedly used and the targets they pursued.

 » Lees verder