12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic – Global Research

28-08-20 03:55:00,

Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases.

I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.

[…]

I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.

[…]

In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.

*

Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).

He is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.

As a physician, scientist and author he has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research does not meet good scientific standards of evidence.

What he says:

Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.

The one situation where an entire,

 » Lees verder

8 MORE Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic – Dutch Anarchy

17-04-20 09:00:00,


Our third batch of Medical experts dissenting from the media/political “consensus”.

* * *

Dr John Lee is an English consultant histopathologist at Rotherham General Hospital and formerly clinical professor of pathology at Hull York Medical School. He is most notable to the wider public as co-presenter (with Gunther von Hagens) of Anatomy for Beginners (screened in the UK on Channel 4 in 2005), Autopsy: Life and Death (Channel 4, 2006) and Autopsy: Emergency Room (Channel 4, 2007).

What he says:

But there’s another, potentially even more serious problem: the way that deaths are recorded. If someone dies of a respiratory infection in the UK, the specific cause of the infection is not usually recorded, unless the illness is a rare ‘notifiable disease’.

So the vast majority of respiratory deaths in the UK are recorded as bronchopneumonia, pneumonia, old age or a similar designation. We don’t really test for flu, or other seasonal infections. If the patient has, say, cancer, motor neurone disease or another serious disease, this will be recorded as the cause of death, even if the final illness was a respiratory infection. This means UK certifications normally under-record deaths due to respiratory infections.

Now look at what has happened since the emergence of Covid-19. The list of notifiable diseases has been updated. This list — as well as containing smallpox (which has been extinct for many years) and conditions such as anthrax, brucellosis, plague and rabies (which most UK doctors will never see in their entire careers) — has now been amended to include Covid-19. But not flu. That means every positive test for Covid-19 must be notified, in a way that it just would not be for flu or most other infections.

– How deadly is the coronavirus? It’s still far from clearThe Specator, 28th March 2020

 » Lees verder

12 Experts Question The COVID-19 Panic

26-03-20 11:22:00,

Via Off-Guardian.org,

Below is our list of twelve medical experts whose opinions on the Coronavirus outbreak contradict the official narratives of the MSM, and the memes so prevalent on social media.

* * *

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.

What he says:

We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.

[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.

All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.

*  *  *

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology, politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009 he called for an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the EU response to the Swine Flu pandemic.

What he says:

Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.

We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”

That’s missing.

*  *  *

Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University,

 » Lees verder

Nog meer experts tegen klimaat-idiotie..!!

02-01-20 03:07:00,


x

x

Nog meer experts tegen de klimaat-idiotie..!!

2019 © WantToKnow.nl/be

x

Als zelfs de (oud-)directeur van Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, geen blad meer voor de mond neemt en het verhaal over de ‘door de mens veroorzaakte klimaatverandering’ classificeert als ‘de grootste zwendel in de geschiedenis’, dan is er toch wel degelijk wat aan de hand met de hysterie in de Nederlandse politiek rondom dit thema. Kan het zijn dat niemand van ál die politici het weet en maar in het wildeweg raaskalt..? Niemand die, net als bij het sprookje van de ‘nieuwe kleren van de keizer’ dúrft te bekennen, dat het allemaal maar heel, heel dun ijs is, waarop de klimaatpolitiek is gebaseerd. En dat feitelijk de klimaat-activisten in hun blote kont lopen, zonder kleren.

En dat het -om in deze beeldspraak te blijven- net zo eenvoudig heel snel kan gaan dooien, als gaan vriezen.. Wie durft er dan op het dunne ijs te blijven oreren over ‘klimaatverandering’…? Dr. Patrick Moore gaat in een onlangs gegeven interview, volledig in de aanval op de door angstzaaiers gehanteerde ‘klimaattheorie’. Maar vooral richt hij zijn pijlen op hen, die er heimelijk van profiteren en de grote stimulatoren zijn van de klimaatstrijd..!

Want opvallend genoeg, gaat het bij ALLE klimaatcampagnes over het verspreiden van angst, gebaseerd op het schuldgevoel van een slecht geweten.. Want zoals we weten, is angst door de geschiedenis heen, steeds aangewend om mensen te manipuleren en te besturen en ze onder controle te krijgen. Volgens Patrick Moore is de klimaathype strikt genomen ook een dergelijke angstcampagne gebaseerd op schuldgevoelens.

De belangrijkste drijfveer om ‘gaslighting’ toe te passen, is trachten een ​​dynamiek creëren, waarbij volledige controle wordt verkregen over het slachtoffer. Hem of haar zódanig verzwakken, dat deze persoon zeer eenvoudig te manipuleren is. En volledig uit zijn eigen kracht wordt getrokken, zónder dat deze persoon het feitelijk doorheeft.

Klimaatbeweging: ‘een giftige mix van ideologie, politiek en religie’..
In dat kader wordt het fenomeen ‘Gaslighting’ steeds vaker gehoord. (HIER) Het fenomeen waarbij onschuldige mensen worden gemanipuleerd via ‘schuld om onwetendheid’.. Bijvoorbeeld, zo meldt Moore: “Je bent bang dat je indirect je kinderen vermoordt, omdat je ze in je SUV rondrijdt en kooldioxide in de atmosfeer uitstoot.

 » Lees verder