Monsanto Paid Google To Censor Results; Operated Fusion Center To Discredit Journalists And Activists


10-08-19 10:17:00,

By Aaron Kesel

Monsanto (Bayer) operated an intelligence-gathering “fusion center,” to discredit journalists and activists, including singer Neil Young, and paid Google to bury results in its search engine, The Guardian, reported.

Activist Post previously reported that Bayer/Monsanto — the formerly merged company of potentially two of the evilest businesses in history — had kept a file of 200 names, including journalists and lawmakers in hopes of influencing their positions on pesticides according to French prosecutors.

Now, The Guardian has an exposé on Monsanto going a step beyond by spying on journalists through use of a Fusion Center type operation and paying Google to hide negative results.

The Guardian reports:

The records reviewed by the Guardian show Monsanto adopted a multi-pronged strategy to target Carey Gillam, a Reuters journalist who investigated the company’s weedkiller and its links to cancer. Monsanto, now owned by the German pharmaceutical corporation Bayer, also monitored a not-for-profit food research organization through its “intelligence fusion center”, a term that the FBI and other law enforcement agencies use for operations focused on surveillance and terrorism.

The documents, originating from 2015 to 2017, were disclosed as part of one of numerous ongoing court battles on the health hazards of the company’s Roundup weedkiller.

According to The Guardian report, Monsanto also paid Google to promote search results for “Monsanto Glyphosate Carey Gillam” that criticized her work. Further, Monsanto PR staff internally talked about putting pressure on the Reuters news agency, stating they should “continue to push back on [Gillam’s] editors very strongly every chance we get,” and were hoping “she gets reassigned.”

As this author reported for Activate Now, Bayer/Monsanto was recently faced with a jury concluding that its Roundup product causes cancer. The finding was according to a second U.S. jury who ruled its Roundup weed killer was a carcinogenic substance that caused plaintiff Edwin Hardeman’s disease.

Another California man, Dewayne Lee Johnson, was awarded $289 million in August last year after a state jury found Roundup caused his own cancer.

 » Lees verder

Not Just Alexa: Google Employees Eavesdropping On People Via ‘Smart Speakers’


12-07-19 05:52:00,

In April we reported that thousands of Amazon contractors have been eavesdropping on customers who own the company’s Alexa devices. 

Now, thanks to a whistleblower, we find out that Google is doing it too via their Google Home smart speakers, despite repeatedly claiming that they don’t eavesdrop, according to Dutch broadcaster VRT – which notes that the recordings are happening whether or not the speakers are activated. 

VRT NWS was able to listen to more than a thousand excerpts recorded via Google Assistant. In these recordings we could clearly hear addresses and other sensitive information. This made it easy for us to find the people involved and confront them with the audio recordings. –VRT

“This is undeniably my own voice,” said one man tracked down by VRT based on recordings obtained by the outlet. Another couple from Waasmunster, Belgium said they immediately recognized the voices of their son and grandchild. The recordings include conversations and quarrels between people, confidential business calls, conversations with children and ‘bedroom activities.‘

Speech recognition automatically generates a script of the recordings. Employees then have to double check to describe the excerpt as accurately as possible: is it a woman’s voice, a man’s voice or a child? What do they say? They write out every cough and every audible comma. These descriptions are constantly improving Google’s search engines, which results in better reactions to commands. One of our sources explains how this works. 

Most recordings made via Google Home smart speakers are very clear. Recordings made with Google Assistant, the smartphone app, are of telephone quality. But the sound is not distorted in any way. –VRT

Sex and violence

According to more than a thousand sound clips reviewed by VRT, 153 of them included conversations which should have never been recorded due to a clear lack of an activation command. Many of those include sex and violence according to the outlet’s sources. 

One of our three independent sources says he had to describe a recording where he heard a woman who was in definite distress.

 » Lees verder

Wie Google Politik macht und die öffentliche Meinung beeinflusst | Anti-Spiegel


30-06-19 10:28:00,

Google ist längst zu einem politischen Instrument geworden und beeinflusst die öffentliche Meinung massiv.

Google kann über seine Algorithmen beeinflussen, welche Seiten Ihnen bei einer Suchanfrage gezeigt werden und welche nicht. Das zeigt sich besonders bei politischen Fragen. In Deutschland wurde darüber kaum berichtet, aber in den USA hat eine Enthüllungsplattform mit versteckter Kamera Gespräche leitender Google-Mitarbeiter gefilmt, die offen sagen, dass Google im nächste US-Wahlkampf eine wichtige Rolle spielen will, indem es bei Suchanfragen positive Nachrichten über Trump unterdrückt und stattdessen negative Meldungen zeigt.

Im Gegensatz zu deutschen Medien haben englischsprachige Medien darüber berichtet. In Deutschland fand ich lediglich auf RT-Deutsch einen Artikel dazu. Offensichtlich finden die deutschen Medien die Manipulation der öffentlichen Meinung gut, da sie nicht darüber berichten und es schon gar nicht kritisieren.

Interessant ist, dass die mit versteckter Kamera gefilmten Videos auf YouTube gelöscht wurden. Die Begründung von YouTube ist, dass sie die Privatsphäre der Betroffenen verletzen. Die Betroffenen sind leitende Mitarbeiter von Google, die bei einem Mittagessen ganz offen über die politischen Ziele von Google sprechen.

YouTube ist also besorgt wegen der Privatsphäre von Menschen. Wo war eigentlich diese Besorgnis, als es um das Strache-Video ging? Schon an diesem Vergleich sieht man, dass Google bzw. YouTube seine Regeln entsprechend seiner politischen Agenda auslegt und nicht etwa anhand objektiver Kriterien. Jedenfalls hat YouTube, eine Tochterfirma von Google, diese Videos entfernt, wogegen nun die Anwälte der Enthüllungsplattform „Project Veritas“ vorgehen.

Generell ist YouTube längst zu einer Waffe im Informationskrieg geworden. Ich kenne YouTube-Blogger, die berichten, dass ihre Videos bei ihren Abonnenten nicht in der Timeline gezeigt werden, wenn sie bestimmte Themen behandeln. Und zwar nicht etwa nur das entsprechende Video, sondern danach werden noch wochenlang alle neuen Videos unabhängig von ihrem Inhalt in der Reichweite beschränkt.

So berichtete mir ein russischer Blogger, dass er selbst auf Russisch nicht über die Flüchtlingsthematik in Deutschland berichten kann, ohne hinterher von Google „bestraft“ zu werden, indem Google seine Reichweite reduziert. Das kann er anhand seiner Statistiken belegen, weshalb er Themen wie „Flüchtlinge in Europa“ nicht mehr behandelt, da er seinen Kanal hauptberuflich betreibt und auf die Einnahmen angewiesen ist. Da kann er es sich nicht erlauben, wochenlang in seiner Reichweite beschränkt zu werden,

 » Lees verder

GOOGLE: “Organic is a Lie, Supplements are Dangerous, Chiropractic is Fake,” and Other Thoughts They Want You To Think


30-06-19 10:16:00,

By Sayer Ji, GreenMedInfo

Recently, a shocking discovery was made: Google is autocompleting the search fields of billions of users with false information (topics ranging from natural health to candidates for election), based not on objective search volume data, but an extremely biased political and socio-economic agenda — one that is jeopardizing the health and human rights of everyone on the planet. 

On June 3rd, 2019, it was discovered that Google had scrubbed their search results clean of natural health sites, resulting in some losing as much as 99% of their traffic. Soon after, it was discovered that Google also manipulates users with their autocomplete function into thinking that natural approaches to health are fraudulent and even harmful. This is Part 2 of our ongoing series exposing these practices. Part 1 can be found here.

Google manipulates your search results in a very specific way. For instance, if you start your search out with “supplements are,” Google will autocomplete your search field with the following suggestions:


Most Google users believe that its suggestions reflect the volume of searches others are doing on the topic — a reasonable assumption, given Google says their algorithm is “Based on several factors, like how often others have searched for a term.” In fact, Google goes out of their way to say they are not making subjective suggestions, but objective predictions based on real searches:

Predictions, not suggestions

You’ll notice we call these autocomplete “predictions” rather than “suggestions,” and there’s a good reason for that. Autocomplete is designed to help people complete a search they were intending to do, not to suggest new types of searches to be performed. These are our best predictions of the query you were likely to continue entering.

How do we determine these predictions? We look at the real searches that happen on Google and show common and trending ones relevant to the characters that are entered and also related to your location and previous searches. [italics and bold added] Source: Google

But Google Trends data show the “supplements are” autocomplete results above to be inaccurate,

 » Lees verder

Eilmeldung: Google entfernt Websites über Naturheilkunde aus seinen Suchergebnissen – ein Whistleblower sagt, wie und warum


28-06-19 02:14:00,

Anfang dieses Monats entfernte Google in einem vernichtenden algorithmischen Schlag viele der wichtigsten Websites über natürliche Medizin und Entscheidungsfreiheit in Gesundheitsfragen aus seinen organischen Suchergebnissen – einige verloren bis zu 99 Prozent ihrer Besucher. Eigentlich sollte der Begriff »organisch« (organic) für die Suchergebnisse von Google nicht mehr verwendet werden – so die Ergebnisse einer Undercover-Untersuchung durch Project Veritas, bei denen einem die Sprache wegbleibt: Google manipuliert heimlich seine Suchergebnisse und automatischen Textergänzungen, um sich an eine sehr spezielle Reihe gesellschaftspolitischer und wirtschaftlicher Agenden anzupassen, die darauf abzielen, die Trefferauswahl zu manipulieren und private Interessen zu fördern.

Wir leben in einer ganz erstaunlichen, wenn auch intensiven Zeit mit unglaublichen Dunkel- und Lichtzonen.

Doch dank der Macht des Internets genießen wir einen Grad der Informationsfreiheit, den vor uns keine Generation hatte – und diese Informationen sind das Lebenselixier demokratischer Ideale und notwendig für informiertes Einverständnis und freie Entscheidungen in Gesundheitsfragen, unsere wichtigsten Fürsprecher.

Aber was passiert, wenn die Torhüter der Informationen, die durch diese unglaubliche Erfindung fließen, wie Facebook und Pinterest, bestimmte Nutzer oder Inhalte zensieren oder sperren – oder es unmöglich machen, via E-Mail-Marketing-Plattformen wie Mailchimp Nachrichten zu verschicken, wie wir vor Kurzem bei erleben mussten? Wohin wenden wir uns dann, um uns zu informieren?

Warum nicht die Filterung der Social Media und die Zensur der E-Mail-Plattformen umgehen und zu Google zurückkehren?, könnten Sie sich fragen. Ist Google nicht der Archetyp und das moderne Orakel von Fairness? Ist Google nicht längst zum Synonym für das Suchen und Finden objektiver Antworten geworden?

Würden Sie nicht erwarten, dass an erster Stelle erscheinen würde, wenn Sie nach »Kurkuma« suchen, da wir über die weltweit größte Open-Access-Ressource zu diesem Thema verfügen, die über 2700 Peer-Review-Studien zu diesem Thema enthält, die wiederum für über 800 Krankheiten relevant sind? Doch während vor einigen Jahren noch unser Such-Traffic wuchs, ist es heute so, als ob wir im Internet nicht mehr existieren (es sei denn, Sie suchen gezielt nach uns mit Namen).

Stattdessen finden Sie heute an erster Stelle der Google-Ergebnisse über Kurkuma z. B.: »Kurkuma ist vielleicht doch kein Wundergewürz« von oder »Kurkuma: Anwendungsgebiete, Nebenwirkungen, Wechselwirkungen, Dosierung und Warnhinweise« von, die einen Großteil der Forschungsarbeiten,

 » Lees verder

Google Just Scrubbed Natural Health Websites From Its Search Results; Whistleblower Explains How and Why


26-06-19 05:57:00,

By Sayer Ji, GreenMedInfo

Earlier this month, in one devastating algorithmic stroke, Google removed many of the top natural health and health freedom websites from their organic search results — some losing as much as 90% of their traffic. In fact, the term “organic” should no longer be used to describe Google’s referral traffic, as a jaw-dropping undercover investigation by Project Veritas reveals: Google surreptitiously manipulates its search results and auto-suggestions to conform to a very specific set of sociopolitical and economic agendas intended to manipulate elections and promote private interests.

We live in amazing times, albeit intense, filled with incredible darkness and light.

But thanks to the power of the internet, we have a level of freedom of information never enjoyed before by any previous generation on Earth — and that information is the very life’s blood of democratic ideals, and the necessary ingredient for informed consent and health freedom, our primary advocacies.

But what happens when the gate-keepers of the content that flows through this incredible invention, like Facebook and Pinterest, censor and shadow ban certain of its users or content, or their ability to send you messages via email service provider platforms like MailChimp, as we’ve recently experienced on Where do we go for information then?

Why not skip the social media filtering and email platform censorship and go back to using Google, you might ask. Aren’t they the very archetype and modern-day oracle of fairness, having become synonymous with looking for and finding objective answers.

After all, wouldn’t you expect that if you typed in turmeric research, would come up on the first page, given we have the world’s largest, open access resource on the topic which curates over 2,700 peer-reviewed studies relevant to over 800 diseases, on the topic? Whereas a few years ago, our search traffic was growing, today it’s as if we don’t exist on the internet any longer (unless you specifically search for us by name).

Instead, today, you find first page google results on turmeric like: “Turmeric May Not Be a Miracle Spice After All” from, or “Turmeric: Uses, Side Effects, Interactions,

 » Lees verder

It Only Costs Google $20 Million A Year To Control The U.S. Government


13-06-19 06:18:00,

Google has fired six of its largest lobbying firms in an attempt to overhaul its global government affairs and policy operations amid greater government scrutiny of its business, according to the Wall Street Journal. Over the last few months, the company has changed its roster of lobbying firms, as well as its Washington policy team, and lost two senior officials who helped build its “influence operation” into one of the largest in the nation’s capital. The company had been paying about $20 million annually for lobbying, and the firms that Google has now let go made up about half of that cost.

The shake up is part of a “continuing modernization” of Google’s influence operation and it comes at a time when government scrutiny has never been more of a factor. The Justice Department is reportedly getting ready to conduct an antitrust investigation into the company and Congress and state attorneys general are also reviewing its practices. Some politicians are even calling for the company to be broken up.

And so Google is taking the paltry $20 million per year that it has been using to control the government and trying to reallocate it. Among those who are no longer working for the company are “Charlie Black, a longtime Republican strategist, and firms that have relationships with senior Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill, including Off Hill Strategies LLC, which has ties to fiscally conservative Republicans.”

People familiar with the restructuring say that it helps reflect the company’s global reach and will help it deal with regulators and lawmakers across regions and markets. The moves are also seen as a shake up by Google’s new head of policy and government relations, Karan Bhatia. 

Bhatia was brought in last summer to serve as Google’s VP of Policy and Government Relations and, since then, he’s been reassessing the company’s lobbying needs. Susan Molinari, a former Republican congresswoman, stepped down as Google’s head of Washington operations last year and the company has yet to name a successor.

Another executive leaving Google during the shake up is Adam Kovacevich, who ran the firm’s public-policy division. He led the company’s campaign to head off a 2012 FTC investigation into anti-competitive tactics and also helped launch several advocacy groups to help promote public policy matters that benefited the company.

 » Lees verder

Google earned $4.7bn from news organizations in 2018, says study


10-06-19 06:56:00,

An explosive new report details how Google earned a whopping $4.7 billion in ad revenue from news organizations online in 2018, while the entire US news industry made a combined $5.1 billion from digital advertising.

The study, by the News Media Alliance, reveals the extent to which the tech giant profits from the work of web journalists and digital news organizations by monetizing Google search and Google News. According to the study, some 40 percent of clicks on Google’s trending queries are news-related, all of which are monetized.

Also on
Tit-for-tat: Beijing to draft ‘blacklist’ of foreign companies harming interests of Chinese firms

“They make money off this arrangement,” said President and CEO of the News Media Alliance David Chavern who argues that journalists and content creators deserve a cut of that money, “and there needs to be a better outcome for news publishers.”

Google does not pay for the content but generates web traffic clicks, and thus revenue, by sharing headlines and news summaries from various outlets verbatim.

Furthermore, the $4.7 billion figure is a conservative estimate as the analysis didn’t factor in the personal user data collected by Alphabet, Google’s parent company, which can be further monetized.

Details from the report generated a very mixed reception among journalists and media workers who particularly drew attention to the revenues built up by Google while news outlets increasingly lay off staff.

Every penny of that is the result of the labor of low-paid journalists, hanging on by their fingernails. What happens to Google’s profits when all that free high-quality content just goes away?

— DaveLaFontaine (@DaveLaFontaine) June 9, 2019

What also seemed unjust is that the snippet Google shows “is all anyone cares about,” and readers don’t bother actually clicking into the full story. “Google should license/pay for this,” one commenter suggested.

People do realize though that the relationship between the tech company and news media is more complicated, saying that when Google “makes money on news it’s by serving ads ON publishers’

 » Lees verder

Google durchsucht alle Emails nach Bezahlvorgängen


08-06-19 02:39:00,

ARCHIV - ILLUSTRATION - 04.07.2018, Berlin: Auf dem Bildschirm eines iPhones sieht man das Logo der Gmail-Applikation. Google hat die umstrittene Praxis verteidigt, dass App-Entwickler die digitalen Postfächer beim Dienst GMail scannen können. Foto: Fabian Sommer/dpa +++ dpa-Bildfunk +++ | Verwendung weltweit

ARCHIV – ILLUSTRATION – 04.07.2018, Berlin: Auf dem Bildschirm eines iPhones sieht man das Logo der Gmail-Applikation. Google hat die umstrittene Praxis verteidigt, dass App-Entwickler die digitalen Postfächer beim Dienst GMail scannen können. Foto: Fabian Sommer/dpa +++ dpa-Bildfunk +++ | Verwendung weltweit

 » Lees verder

Google Maps maakt van Palestijnse steden spooksteden – DocP


05-06-19 03:47:00,

Wie kolonisten in een illegale nederzetting wil bezoeken heeft geen probleem: Google Maps. Maar voor Palestijnen heeft Google iets spookachtigs. Op de plek waar in werkelijkheid het beruchte Qalandia Checkpoint ligt, zien wij alleen een paar onschuldige rotondes en een winkel voor auto onderdelen. De Westelijke Jordaanoever is door onze vertrouwde Amerikaanse zoekmachine namelijk etnisch gezuiverd. Maar dan grondig: vrijwel alle sporen van Palestijns leven bestaan niet in de wereld volgens Google Maps.

Geen weg naar Jericho

Als wij al een Palestijnse stad op de kaart zien – Jericho bijvoorbeeld – dan begint daar meteen het probleem zodra wij de route van, pak weg, Jeruzalem naar deze beroemde en iconische stad op het scherm willen hebben. Hoewel de afstand slechts ruim een uur met de auto is, kan de grootste zoekmachine van de wereld geen route vinden: “can’t find a way there”. De meeste Joodse Israëli’s zullen daar geen probleem mee hebben want in Jericho “woont niemand”. Zij zullen zoeken naar de vlak bij Jericho gelegen nederzetting Beit HaArava waar familie en vrienden wonen. Google vindt meteen drie routes; kiezen maar!

Is dit een incidenteel foutje van Google? Nee, als je waar dan ook op de ‘Westbank’ van de ene grote stad naar de andere wil – van Bethlehem naar Hebron of Jericho, enzovoort – dan verschijnt de mededeling, “Sorry, we could not calculate driving directions from…” Mondoweiss heeft deze hulpvaardigheid van Google bij de etnische zuivering Palestina vergeleken met de beroemde roman ‘1984’ van George Orwell. Daarin zorgt de dictator ervoor dat alle feiten uit de werkelijkheid worden aangepast aan de van bovenaf opgelegde waarheid. Zie ook verder de uitstekende reportage op Mondoweiss, ‘Palestinian cities are ghost towns between settlements, on Google Maps’.

De redactie

Afbeelding: de verdwijning van Qalandia, volgens Google Maps

 » Lees verder

Google Has a Creepy Secret Page That Tracks Your (Online and Offline) Shopping History


30-05-19 10:11:00,

By Dagny Taggart

Google is very interested in your shopping habits – so much that the tech giant is collecting and saving your purchase history.

The company has been quietly keeping track of your online (and sometimes, offline) purchases for years, according to a recent report from CNBC.

In that report, writer Todd Haselton explains that he was looking around in his Google account and found something alarming:

A page called “Purchases” shows an accurate list of many — though not all — of the things I’ve bought dating back to at least 2012. I made these purchases using online services or apps such as Amazon, DoorDash or Seamless, or in stores such as Macy’s, but never directly through Google.

But because the digital receipts went to my Gmail account, Google has a list of info about my buying habits.

Google even knows about things I long forgot I’d purchased, like dress shoes I bought inside a Macy’s store on Sept. 14, 2015. It also knows:

  • I ordered a Philly cheesesteak on a hoagie roll with Cheez Whiz and banana peppers on Jan. 14, 2016.
  • I reloaded my Starbucks card in November 2014.
  • I bought a new Kindle on Dec. 18, 2013, from Amazon.
  • I bought “Solo: A Star Wars Story” from iTunes on Sept. 14, 2018.

And so on. (source)

I decided to check my own Purchases page to see what kind of data Google has been collecting there and found this:

My purchase history goes back to October 2014 (!) but I decided not to share it all here in the interest of saving space (and sparing myself some embarrassment). I blacked out three personal items for, well, privacy reasons – as if privacy is even a thing these days.

I don’t shop online very often, I rarely opt-in to receiving email receipts, and I usually pay with cash when I shop or go out to eat,

 » Lees verder

Army’s ‘Google Earth On Steroids’ Can Look Inside Buildings


29-05-19 07:29:00,

New mapping technology that is expected to transform training and simulation exercises for America’s warfighters was unveiled at the IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC) 2019 conference on May 15 in Stockholm, Sweden, reported National Defense Magazine

Jason Knowles, director of geospatial science and technology at the University of Southern California’s Institute for Creative Technologies, an Army affiliated research center, spoke at ITEC about the new terrain capture and reconstruction software that recreates complex environments including cities for simulation exercises and war planning. The institute is part of a cross-functional team working on the mapping software (called One World Terrain (OWT) project).

Knowles described the new software as “Google Earth on steroid.”

At a briefing during ITEC, Knowles showed the audience a picture of an enemy base that was captured and digitally re-created in about an hour using commercial software and a small drone. “We were able to throw that UAS up, capture that in an hour, put it on the laptop, process it, and push it out,” he said.

“The ability to have an individual or a squad go out, collect their own organic 3D model for ingesting into their modeling and simulation is huge for us,” he said.

“The interior of buildings are now being fused and snapped inside of that 3D model,” Knowles said. The software can “strip the outside of a building level by level and see what’s inside the building. That’s obviously very useful for operators.”

He said the software is linked with GPS data so war planners can organize future real operations.

The rapid 3D terrain capture and reconstruction system is supported by aerial imagery from satellites and aircraft. For higher resolution, reconnaissance teams can deploy small, handheld drones to collect much higher resolution imagery, he added.

The software uses machine learning and artificial intelligence for the data merging component to “make the model smart, so it’s not just [identifying objects in] pictures,” he said. For example, it can tell troops if a perimeter wall of an enemy base needs to breached with a vehicle or munition.

The new mapping software is one of the Army’s top modernization priorities,

 » Lees verder

Google vs. Huawei sollte vor allem für die EU ein letztes Warnsignal sein um sich von den USA zu emanzipieren


21-05-19 01:53:00,

Die Entscheidung, den chinesischen Technologie-Konzern Huawei auf eine schwarze Liste mit Unternehmen zu setzen, die von US-Unternehmen nicht mehr beliefert werden dürfen, sollte die naive Vorstellung endgültig widerlegen, dass es sich bei den weltweit dominanten Tech-Giganten Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft und Co. um internationale Konzerne mit eigenen Standards handelt. Wenn das Weiße Haus den Krieg erklärt, werden Google und Co. zu treuen Soldaten, wie es schon Edward Snowden mit seinen Enthüllungen klarstellte. Der Huawei-Boykott zeigt jedoch, wie skrupellos die US-Regierung die Marktmacht der Tech-Giganten schon heute in ihrem Wirtschaftskrieg einsetzt. Der Rest der Welt darf das nicht hinnehmen! Vor allem für die EU müsste dies nach den aufgezwungenen Sanktionen gegen Russland, Iran und Venezuela das allerletzte Warnsignal sein, sich schnellstmöglich von den USA loszusagen. Von Jens Berger.

Dieser Beitrag ist auch als Audio-Podcast verfügbar.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Was bedeutet der Boykott eigentlich konkret?

Dass Google selbst alles andere als begeistert von der Order aus dem Weißen Haus war, Huawei künftig keine Lizenzen für die Nutzung der Google-Play-Services und den Zugang zum Google-Play-Store auszustellen, ist durchaus glaubhaft. Schließlich dürfte der von Trump angeordnete Huawei-Boykott für Google langfristig zumindest den Verlust des kontinental-asiatischen und afrikanischen Marktes bedeuten. Schon heute liefern die großen chinesischen Smartphone-Hersteller ihre Android-Smartphones auf dem Heimatmarkt ohnehin ohne Software von Google und ohne Schnittstellen zu den Services und dem Store von Google aus. Auf dem chinesischen Smartphone-Markt spielen ausländische Hersteller keine nennenswerte Rolle. Global stellen Samsung und Apple hingegen immer noch etwas mehr als ein Drittel des Marktes. Global war Huawei im letzten Jahr der größte Gewinner mit einem Verkaufsplus von +34%, während Samsung und Apple global Marktanteile verloren.

Indem Google Huawei aussperrt, zwingt es die chinesischen Hersteller de facto, ihre auf dem chinesischen Markt ohnehin schon vorhandenen lokalen Variationen des Android-Systems mit eigenen Vertriebsplattformen für die Apps von Drittanbietern auch international zum Standard zu machen und damit Google auszusperren. Huawei hat dies für den so wichtigen europäischen Markt bereits angekündigt. Es ist jedoch eine offene Frage, ob eine chinesische Google-Alternative auf dem europäischen Markt überhaupt eine Chance hätte. Hier sind Zweifel angebracht. Auf den Wachstumsmärkten Asiens und Afrikas wäre der Verlierer jedoch wahrscheinlich Google,

 » Lees verder

Facebook and Google Must Answer to the Market


07-05-19 09:23:00,

Giant technology companies like Facebook and Google get that way because their size is a crucial part of their value. Facebook’s network effects and Google’s search algorithm, finely tuned by its own big data, are a large part of what makes the companies dominant in their respective markets.

But size also gives tech giants tremendous power that, just like that of big government, not only can but will be abused. 2018 saw Facebook and Google embroiled in seemingly endless scandals and controversies about what they do with their enormous caches of data.

The standard antitrust approach would consider breaking the companies up, but that would greatly reduce the value their component parts bring to the market. Seemingly less draconian measures would likely devolve into a complex web of rules that might even serve as barriers to entry to potential competitors down the road.

Can the market provide sufficient discipline to prevent future abuses by giants like Facebook and Google? Those who favor less antitrust enforcement often point to consumers voting with their feet or dollars as both more potent and less intrusive. Consider this a test.

Voting With Their Feet

For our purposes, “market discipline” means a firm either losing market share because of perceived abuses of power, or being preempted from bad actions by the credible threat of losing market share. Consumers may take their business elsewhere because the bad actions directly impact the value they receive (such as a higher risk of one’s own data being compromised) or because they don’t like the firm’s broader impact on society (such as spreading “fake news”).

In theory, perceptions of a firm’s impact on society are a disciplining force in every market. If I found out the chef at my favorite restaurant was a prominent neo-Nazi, I would stop going. But the most successful firms always have some wiggle room because of the superiority of their product or costs of switching away from it.

Market discipline doesn’t happen overnight — consumers first have to be alerted to the firm’s negative actions. In the case of Facebook and Google, we see this messy yet effective process unfolding in different ways.

 » Lees verder

Google Tracks Your Location And Shares It With Police, Even When Your Phone Is Off


29-04-19 06:28:00,

Authored by Derrick Broze via The Mind Unleashed blog,

Even if you disable GPS, deactivate phone location tracking, and turn off your phone, it’s still possible for Google and the NSA to monitor your every move.

Over the last two decades, cell phone use has become an everyday part of life for the vast majority of people around the planet. Nearly without question, consumers have chosen to carry these increasingly smart devices with them everywhere they go. Despite surveillance revelations from whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, the average smart phone user continues to carry the devices with little to no security or protection from privacy invasions.

Americans make up one of the largest smartphone markets in the world today, yet they rarely question how intelligence agencies or private corporations might be using their smartphone data. A recent report from the New York Times adds to the growing list of reasons why Americans should be asking these questions. According to the Times, law enforcement have been using a secret technique to figure out the location of Android users. The technique involves gathering detailed location data collected by Google from Android phones, iPhones, and iPads that have Google Maps and other Google apps installed.

The location data is stored inside a Google database known as Sensorvault, which contains detailed location records of hundreds of millions of devices from around the world. The records reportedly contain location data going back to 2009. The data is collected whether or not users are making calls or using apps.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) says police are using a single warrant—sometimes known as a “geo-fence” warrant—to access location data from devices that are linked to individuals who have no connection to criminal activity and have not provided any reasonable suspicion of a crime. Jennifer Lynch, EFF’s Surveillance Litigation Director, says these searches are problematic for several reasons.

First, unlike other methods of investigation used by the police, the police don’t start with an actual suspect or even a target device—they work backward from a location and time to identify a suspect,” Lynch wrote.

 » Lees verder

How Google Is Helping The US Government Violate Your Privacy


26-04-19 09:43:00,

Authored by Derrick Broze via The Mind Unleashed blog,

A new court filing argues that Google is helping the U.S. government circumvent Fourth Amendment protections in order to conduct warrantless searches.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has formally accused Google of scanning billions of personal files of users at the request of the U.S. government. EPIC recently filed a “friend of the court” brief alleging that Google is helping the U.S. government conduct warrantless searches by scanning user files in search of potentially illegal content or evidence of crimes.

The brief came in response to United States v. Wilson, a case where Google scanned images of billions of users files in an attempt to track images of missing children reported by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). After scanning the images contained within users files, Google contacts law enforcement to share information on individuals who may have images of missing children. However, this entire process happens without permission from users or a warrant issued by a court. EPIC’s brief argues that “because neither Google nor the government explained how the image matching technique actually works or presented evidence establishing accuracy and reliability, the government’s search was unreasonable.”

EPIC says this situation is allowing law enforcement to ignore Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure of property and conduct warrantless searches with help from Google.

If, for example, police officials would like to examine the digital files of certain suspects, they can simply turn to Google, which will do all the searching for them – and without the time, expense or hassle of getting a warrant for this search,” CPO Magazine reports. “For police departments, warrantless searches of digital material would be one way to make their criminal investigations much easier.”

The crux of this particular case revolves around a new Google algorithm that actively scans files to find a specific image using image matching. Previously, the NCMEC was supposed to provide Google with image hashes that are used to identify a unique image without showing the actual image. However, Google’s new algorithm uses image matching instead of image hashing.

 » Lees verder

UK To Fine Facebook, Google For Hosting Terrorist Content


08-04-19 05:56:00,

The cat and mouse game between the world’s largest media company and global governments continues.

Just days after Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg called for more government regulation in an attempt to mollify the company’s growing critics, while seeking to squash smaller competitors as well as give governments a legitimate reason to enforce censorship and chip away at freedom of speech in order to comply with Facebook’s mysterious “community standards”, the company and its tech peers are facing a new UK law that will impose “substantial” fines, or even ban companies if they don’t act swiftly enough to remove content that encourages terrorism and child sexual exploitation and abuse.

Additionally, hinting that Facebook is now openly seen as a media empire instead of merely a distributor of content, the companies’ directors could also be held personally liable if illegal content is not taken down within a short and pre-determined time-frame, the UK’s Home Office said, which is also seeking to tackle the spread of fake news and interference in elections.

In short: wholesale government censorship under the guise of cracking down on the private sector.

The exact level of fines will be examined during a 12 week consultation following the legislation’s launch on Monday, Bloomberg reported.

The crackdown on UK online content takes place amid the fallout from the case of 14-year-old Molly Russell, whose father said the teenager killed herself in 2017 after viewing self-harm and suicide content online. The terrorist attack in New Zealand last month in which 50  Muslims were killed while footage was live-streamed online also prompted UK legislators to demand a new law over a voluntary code.

“Put simply, the tech companies have not done enough to protect their users and stop this shocking content from appearing in the first place,” Home Secretary Sajid Javid said in a statement released by his office. “Our new proposals will protect U.K. citizens and ensure tech firms will no longer be able to ignore their responsibilities.”

The crackdown on internet content will spread far beyond just Facebook: search engines, online messaging services and file hosting sites will all fall under the remit of a new regulator. Annual reports on what companies have done to remove and block harmful content will be required and streaming sites aimed at children,

 » Lees verder

Google flipped seats, shifted millions of votes to Dems in 2018 midterms, researcher tells RT


25-03-19 10:43:00,

Google’s biased search algorithm actually flipped seats in the 2018 US midterm elections, according to a researcher who found the search engine’s “dramatically biased” results could have shifted over 78 million votes to Democrats.

Upwards of 25 percent of the national elections in the world are being decided without people’s knowledge by Google’s search algorithm,” senior research psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology told RT, calling the search engine the “deciding factor” in close races.

Also on
‘Steering’ conservatives & policymakers: Google explains CPAC sponsorship in leaked audio

Epstein’s study of three 2018 California House races found Google played the deciding role in flipping those Republican-held seats to the Democrats, influencing millions of undecided voters by controlling what they saw when they searched 500 election-related terms. Google’s results showed a “significant liberal bias,” unlike Bing’s or Yahoo’s – and with 90 percent of the search engine’s market share in the US, that bias is enormously influential.

Search results favoring one side of an issue can influence anywhere from 20 to 80 percent of undecided voters, depending on the issue and demographic group, Epstein said. He has spent six years investigating the role of what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME) in swaying public opinion, more recently focusing on the political ramifications by looking at various countries’ elections.

People trust algorithmic output. They trust Google. They think because it’s generated by a computer, they don’t see the human hand – they think it’s impartial and objective and, because of that, their opinions change,” Epstein said.

Also on
Tap ‘Idiot’ and get ‘Trump’, news is bad and my phone’s a spy: Lawmakers complain to Google CEO

While Google denies it manipulates search rankings to manipulate political sentiment or makes election-specific tweaks, Epstein says their response is disingenuous – he never claimed they re-ranked results, merely that the results they displayed were biased.

We found very consistently that on Google they ended up with search results favoring liberals and favoring liberal news sources,

 » Lees verder

Google Influenced Midterm Elections, May Have Cost Republicans Seats: Study


23-03-19 11:57:00,

New research reveals that Google built biases into its search results that influenced the 2018 midterm elections – possibly costing Republicans three congressional districts. 

First things first – the study was conducted by Dr. Robert Epstein – a San Diego-based Harvard Ph.D. who founded the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. He’s also a Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), a UCSD visiting scholar, and served as editor-in-chief of Psychology Today. 

He also supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 (just like Google!).

Down to the findings: 

Epstein and AIBRT analyzed Google searches linked to three highly competitive southern California congressional races in which Democrats won, and found that Google’s “clear democrat bias” may have flipped the seats away from Republican candidates. According to the study, at least 35,455 undecided voters within the three California districts may have been persuaded to vote Democrat due to the biased Google search results. 

Epstein says that in the days leading up to the 2018 midterms, he was able to preserve “more than 47,000 election-related searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo, along with the nearly 400,000 web pages to which the search results linked.”

Analysis of this data showed a clear pro-Democrat bias in election-related Google search results as compared to competing search engines. Users performing Google searches related to the three congressional races the study focused on were significantly more likely to see pro-Democrat stories and links at the top of their results.

As Epstein’s previous studies have shown, this can have a huge impact on the decisions of undecided voters, who often assume that their search results are unbiased. Epstein has called this the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). –Breitbart

Google executives and Democrats have disputed Epstein’s findings, apparently unaware that we can simply google documented instances of the Silicon Valley search giant’s overt bias surrounding elections, their ability to influence them, and their other efforts to hobble conservatives

“These are new forms of manipulation people can’t see,”

 » Lees verder

‘Be Evil’: Google Bans VPN Ads Helping Chinese Circumvent Censorship


22-03-19 09:44:00,

Google is once again helping the Chinese government and its Orwellian control over the flow of information. 

Earlier this month, evidence emerged suggesting that Google has continued to develop the “Dragonfly” censored search engine despite claiming they had abandoned it after an internal revolt. 

Now, ZDNet reports that Google has banned ads for virtual private network (VPN) products targeting Chinese users – citing “local legal restrictions.” 

VPNs are the only way Chinese users can circumvent draconian internet filters which have blocked sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Gab, Instagram, Reddit, Discord, WhatsApp, WikiLeaks, Google and Gmail. Blocked news websites include Zero Hedge, BBC, Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ, NYT and Business Insider. 

“It is currently Google Ads policy to disallow promoting VPN services in China, due to local legal restrictions,” Google said in a Wednesday email. 

The email was received and shared with ZDNet by VPNMentor, a website offering advice, tips, and reviews of VPN products.

The company said Google prevented its employees from placing Google search ads for the Chinese version of its site. –ZDNet

In January 2017, Beijing cracked down on VPN services – requiring that all providers active in China register for authorization from the CHinese government. In July, China forced Apple to remove all VPN apps from its App Store. After that, a “full-out ban on all VPNs was imposed on March 31, 2018,” according to ZD – though some apps continued to function regardless. 

Nonetheless, Chinese officials are now using the ban to go after users caught using VPNs. The first fine for using a VPN product was issued earlier this year to a Guangdong.

Despite banning consumers from using VPN apps, China remains one of the top sellers of VPN technologies. A November 2018 study found that almost 60 percent of the top free mobile VPN apps are run by companies with Chinese ownership or based in China.

We wonder if Google employees will protest yet another example of helping China to keep its citizens in the dark?

 » Lees verder

UK to fine Facebook & Google up to 4% value for not removing ‘hate speech’ & ‘fake news’ fast enough


01-03-19 10:18:00,

The UK is rolling out a draconian new ‘harmful content’ policy that will punish social media with massive fines if they fail to remove ill-defined “hate speech,” “misinformation,” and “problematic content” quickly enough.

An “independent tech regulator” would have the power to impose fines amounting to as much as 4 percent of a company’s value if Facebook, Google, or any other social media platform is too slow to remove objectionable content, according to UK digital minister Margot James, who told Business Insider the new rules would be officially unveiled next month. The regulations are purportedly aimed at eradicating “illegal hate speech,” along with child grooming and “problematic content” related to suicide and self-harm, but also target the Western governments’ beloved punching bag, “misinformation.” 

While the new regulator is supposed to be independent of government, it will be up to ministers to decide whether to set up a brand new body or just hand the responsibility for censoring objectionable content over to Ofcom – the same regulator which was recently found to be colluding with a government-funded “think tank” to tie up RT in regulatory red tape with astroturfed “complaints.” 

Also on
Was ‘Institute for Statecraft’ behind Ofcom’s targeting of RT? Sleuths point to yes

Based in part on Germany’s NetzDG laws, which fine companies tens of millions of dollars for hate speech if offending messages are not deleted within a certain period, the new UK regulations won’t stop at censoring “illegal hate speech” (which James apparently defines as anything from terrorist recruitment videos to racism, leaving plenty of wiggle room for neocon think-tanks to sink popular alternative media pages). Child grooming, “problematic content” related to self-harm, and even “misinformation” can now cost tech companies billions of dollars – up to 4 percent of their revenue – if they do not act quickly.

Tech companies listen with their wallets,” Conservative MP Damian Collins said, praising the German model. Collins recently led an 18-month parliamentary investigation into “

 » Lees verder

Google Secretly Expands Tech Empire Across the U.S., Getting Millions in Tax Breaks


19-02-19 08:47:00,

Amazon spent much of the last three months in the media spotlight, with its search for a second headquarters outside Seattle leading both to bidding wars between cities fighting for its affections, and extensive backlash from residents and elected officials in New York City, one of the winning locations. The protests against the new development were loud enough to cause Amazon to cancel the deal last week.

While Amazon received both suitors and scrutiny, another tech behemoth was quietly expanding its footprint across the United States. At the end of 2018, Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced expansion plans leading to a presence in 24 out of 50 states. The Verge reported in December that “So far, most of Google’s facility development plans in the US have been met with little opposition outside of the Bay Area.” According to a new report in The Washington Post, however, that might be because the public wasn’t aware of them.

Post Reporter Elizabeth Dwoskin writes that Google’s “development spree has often been shrouded in secrecy, making it nearly impossible for some communities to know, let alone protest or debate, who is using their land, their resources and their tax dollars until after the fact.”

In Midlothian, Texas, Google, under the name Sharka LLC, received over $10 million in tax breaks from local government for developing a data center in the town. Larry Barnett, president of Midlothian Economic Development, one of the agencies that negotiated tax breaks, told Dwoskin that he knew Sharka LLC was really Google, but the company had asked for secrecy, and didn’t reveal itself publicly until the deal was finalized. Travis Smith, managing editor of the Waxahachie Daily Light, a local paper, said, “I’m confident that had the community known this project was under the direction of Google, people would have spoken out,” adding, “We didn’t know that it was Google until after it passed.”

The process repeated itself in multiple cities.

In San Jose, Calif., where Google is planning its second-largest campus after its original home in Mountain View, the company has used nondisclosure agreements with local officials and developers to keep its plans under wraps. Records of this, going back to 2006,

 » Lees verder

Google Also Violated Apple’s Trust With App That Quietly Collected Sensitive User Data


31-01-19 10:37:00,

After setting off another firestorm over Facebook’s abusive data privacy practices when it revealed that the social media giant encouraged users as young as 13 to bypass the Apple app store and side-load an app that offered them a small financial incentive to allow the company unfettered access to their personal data, TechCrunch has followed up its earlier report with another bombshell: Google built a very similar app that functioned in practically the same exact way.

The app built by Google, called Screenwise Meter, was available for iOS and Android users. Like Facebook, the app violated Apple’s policies over using its enterprise developer certificate to allow non-employees to download the app. It also encouraged teenagers to download the app, allowing Google to hoover up sensitive personal data about their phone-usage habits.


The only differences are that Google’s app was around longer (it launched in 2012, whereas Facebook’s app wasn’t introduced until 2016, after Apple banned Facebook’s Onavo “corporate spyware” app from its app store), and Google was slightly more transparent about the app’s functionality.

First launched in 2012, Screenwise lets users earn gift cards for sideloading an Enterprise Certificate-based VPN app that allows Google to monitor and analyze their traffic and data. Google has rebranded the program as part of the Cross Media Panel and Google Opinion Rewards programs that reward users for installing tracking systems on their mobile phone, PC web browser, router and TV. In fact, Google actually sends participants a special router that it can monitor. Originally, Screenwise was open to users as young as 13, just like Facebook’s Research app that’s now been shut down on iOS but remains on Android.

Now, according to the site’s Panelist Eligibility rules, Google requires the primary users of its Opinion Rewards to be 18 or older, but still allows secondary panelists as young as 13 in the same household to join the program and have their devices tracked, as demonstrated in this video here (which was created in August of last year, underscoring that the program is still active):


Originally, Screenwise was open to users as young as 13, just like Facebook’s Research app that’s now been shut down on iOS but remains on Android.

 » Lees verder

Google and Facebook broke company records for US government lobbying in 2018


23-01-19 09:27:00,

Facing increased public scrutiny, Google and Facebook spent record amounts of money lobbying the US government on privacy and antitrust policies in 2018, with both companies topping previous highs, new data filings showed.

In quarterly filings to Congress disclosed on Tuesday, Google revealed that it dished out a company-record of $21.2 million on Washington lobbying last year, besting its previous record of $18.22 million from 2012. The search giant spent $18.04 million on lobbying in 2017.

Facebook disclosed a lobbying spend of $12.62 million, which was up from its previous high of $11.51 million in 2017, according to the Washington D.C.-based Center for Responsive Politics which tracks money in politics.

Also on
Imagine! An ‘alternative internet’ not ‘completely in the hands of Facebook & Google’

Companies like Google and Facebook have faced increased scrutiny into their policies and practices in recent years. Both have been accused of using “dark patterns” to trick their users into adopting certain privacy policies and using “misleading wording” to make the policies too convoluted for users to figure out. They have also battled accusations of political bias against both right wing and left wing activists

Lawmakers and regulators around the world have been weighing new privacy and antitrust rules to limit the power of huge tech giants.

Google has consistently ranked among the top spenders when it comes to lobbying the government, alongside defense contractors and healthcare firms. The search giant said its discussions with lobbyists focused on search technology, criminal justice reform, and international tax reform.

If you wonder why some startups raise $50-100M rounds early on, consider this is what some of them are up against:

– Google spent $21.2M on US govt lobbying in 2018

– Facebook spent $12.62M, up from $11.51M


— Roi Carthy (@Roi) January 23, 2019

Filings showed that Facebook was lobbying the Federal Trade Commission, which is looking into its data security policies. After facing political scrutiny over “fake news” and the origin of ads on its platform during the 2016 presidential election in the US,

 » Lees verder

Google wins U.S. approval for new radar-based motion sensor | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda


05-01-19 11:19:00,

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) Google unit won approval from U.S. regulators to deploy a radar-based motion sensing device known as Project Soli.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) said in an order late on Monday that it would grant Google a waiver to operate the Soli sensors at higher power levels than currently allowed. The FCC said the sensors can also be operated aboard aircraft.

The FCC said the decision “will serve the public interest by providing for innovative device control features using touchless hand gesture technology.”

A Google spokeswoman did not immediately comment on Wednesday.

Google said in documents filed with the FCC that the effort emerged from the work of Google’s Advanced Technology and Projects group that focuses on development of mobile technologies.

The FCC said the Soli sensor captures motion in a three-dimensional space using a radar beam to enable touchless control of functions or features that can benefit users with mobility or speech impairments.

Google says the sensor can allow users to press an invisible button between the thumb and index fingers or a virtual dial that turns by rubbing a thumb against the index finger. In a video on its website, Google said a user could operate a smart watch, scroll through music or adjust the volume by simply motioning using the system.

Google added that the radar signal could penetrate fabrics, enabling controls that could work in a pocket or a backpack.

The company says that “even though these controls are virtual, the interactions feel physical and responsive” as feedback is generated by the haptic sensation of fingers touching.

Google says the virtual tools can approximate the precision of natural human hand motion and the sensor can be embedded in wearables, phones, computers and vehicles.

FILE PHOTO: Google signage is seen at Google headquarters in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., December 17, 2018. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

In March, Google asked the FCC to allow its short-range interactive motion sensing Soli radar to operate in the 57- to 64-GHz frequency band at power levels consistent with European Telecommunications Standards Institute standards.

Facebook Inc (FB.O) raised concerns with the FCC that the Soli sensors operating in the spectrum band at higher power levels might have issues coexisting with other technologies.

 » Lees verder

Google wins lawsuit, can continue to use facial recognition tech on users without consent


02-01-19 01:22:00,

A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit that alleged Google’s nonconsensual use of facial recognition technology violated users’ privacy rights, allowing the tech giant to continue to scan and store their biometric data.

The lawsuit, filed in 2016, alleged that Google violated Illinois state law by collecting biometric data – as biologically unique to users as fingerprints – without their consent. The data was harvested from their pictures stored on Google Photos.

The plaintiffs wanted more than $5 million in damages for “hundreds of thousands” of users affected, arguing that the unauthorized scanning of their faces was a violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, which completely outlaws the gathering of biometric information without consent.

Also on
Happy New Year, big tech! France starts taxing Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon

Google countered that the plaintiffs were not entitled to any compensation, as they had not been harmed by the data collection. On Saturday, US District Judge Edmond E. Chang sided with the tech giant, ruling that the plaintiffs had not suffered any “concrete harm,” and dismissing the suit.

As well as allowing Google to continue the practice, the ruling could have implications for other cases pending against Facebook and Snapchat. Both companies are currently being sued for violating the Illinois act.

Amid rising alarm from privacy activists, biometric scanning has become ever more ubiquitous in recent years. The technology has been deployed at American airports, Russian railroads, and by British police – despite being unreliable and unregulated in most jurisdictions.

Facial recognition can be used to identify faces in crowds from CCTV footage, track the movements of people on public transport networks, and monitor public places for wanted criminals. In Ireland, the technology has found a quainter and less Orwellian use, where it is used to track and monitor the moo-vements of dairy cows.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

 » Lees verder

If you use Google, Facebook, Twitter, You Support Fascist Censorship –

03-12-18 05:04:00,

Copyright .© Paul Craig Roberts 2018.- Please contact us for information on syndication rights.

This site offers factual information and viewpoints that might be useful in arriving at an understanding of the events of our time. We believe that the information comes from reliable sources, but cannot guarantee the information to be free of mistakes and incorrect interpretations. IPE has no official position on any issue and does not necessarily endorse the statements of any contributor.

 » Lees verder

How Google Wipes Palestine Off the Map – Global Research


31-10-18 03:22:00,

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

The original source of this article is

Middle East Monitor

Copyright ©

Asa Winstanley


Middle East Monitor

, 2018

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

 » Lees verder

Google Vs. Trump: “The Good Censor” On Collision Course With The Patriot President

Google Vs. Trump: “The Good Censor” On Collision Course With The Patriot President

13-10-18 07:50:00,

Authored by ‘Washington Watcher’ via,

The leaked internal Google briefing “The Good Censor” [PDF] has received suspiciously little attention from the Main Stream Media, but it represents the crassest statement yet of the Tech oligopolies’ intention to impose Silicon Valley Political Correctness on the U.S.

As American Thinker Editor Thomas Lifson puts it:

“I congratulate for the scoop, and I urge everyone -I am looking at you, President Trump and Congress – to read and ponder the fate of the Republic unless this company is defanged, most likely by antitrust action, but possibly also via civil courts.” [Stunning 85-page Google memo ‘The Good Censor’ leaked to BreitbartOctober 10, 2018]

What are Trump’s options? He’s certainly thinking about the issue.

The Washington Post reported recently that the White House was backing off a proposed executive order that would have required federal agencies to “investigate and/or prosecute” tech giants for bias. Administration officials told WaPo:

“Although the White House is concerned about the conduct of online platforms and their impact on society, this document is not the result of an official White House policymaking process.” [White House distances itself from reports that Trump could target Facebook, Google and Twitter with a new executive order, by Tony Romm and Josh Dawsey, September 22, 2018]

WaPo reported Trump has demanded an executive order on this matter for some time, but all of the drafts have been deemed “unworkable.” Sources tell the Watcher that the fallout from the leak deterred the President but he still considers the issue a top priority for his base and he wants it addressed.

Of course, first, we have to shoot down True Conservative notions that it’s not the government’s job to resolve tech censorship. Dogmatic Conservatism Incers insist the free market will magically fix the problem and government intervention would somehow be worse than suppression of right-wing views. Some—such as The Weekly Standard’sJonathan Last—have even celebrated this censorship as a necessary measure against “repugnant” voices.

 » Lees verder

Google Maps toont alleen de Israëlische realiteit – The Rights Forum

Google Maps toont alleen de Israëlische realiteit – The Rights Forum

06-10-18 02:58:00,



C-gebied Area C Naqab Negev Bedoeïenen Kolonisering Gaza Westoever

Onderzoek / Google Maps toont alleen de Israëlische realiteit

De cartografie van Google Maps weerspiegelt niet de feitelijke situatie in Israël en Palestina, maar de politieke realiteit zoals Israël zich die wenst. Palestijnen in bezet gebied hebben er niets aan. In een kritisch rapport wordt Google opgeroepen zijn leven te beteren.

Niet op Google Maps: Israëlische checkpoints en roadblocks op de bezette Westelijke Jordaanoever.+972 Magazine 

Wie weleens door de bezette Palestijnse gebieden heeft gereisd, heeft misschien gemerkt dat Google Maps daar weinig behulpzaam is. Dat is geen toeval. Volgens een rapport van de non-profit organisatie 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media ontwijkt Google zijn verantwoordelijkheden onder zowel het internationaal recht als de universele mensenrechten door in zijn online kaartenservice enkel het ‘Israëlische verhaal’ te vertellen. In het rapport, getiteld Mapping Segregation, stelt de organisatie onder andere dat de applicatie meerdere Palestijnse dorpen niet toont en in zijn routeomschrijvingen geen rekening houdt met de restricties waarmee Palestijnen dagelijks te maken hebben.

Politieke cartografie

Hoe Google Israël en Palestina in kaart brengt is van belang omdat ruimtelijke indeling een van de aspecten is die de kwestie-Palestina/Israël bepaalt. Als grootste en meest gebruikte kaartenservice kan Google Maps bepaalde standpunten over die indeling legitimeren en andere delegitimeren. Google kiest ervoor de realiteit vanuit Israëlisch politiek perspectief weer te geven.

Zo wordt Israël op Google Maps duidelijk aangegeven als staat, met Jeruzalem als hoofdstad. De bezette Westelijke Jordaanoever en de Gazastrook worden niet gemarkeerd als deel van een land of staat. Google erkent dus wel het bestaan van de staat Israël, maar niet van een Palestijnse staatkundige entiteit. Het erkent bovendien Jeruzalem als Israëls hoofdstad, terwijl er afgezien van de Verenigde Staten en Guatemala geen land is dat die erkenning deelt. Google geeft de Israëlische realiteit weer, die haaks staat op het internationaal recht.

Palestijnse dorpen bestaan niet

Opvallend is daarnaast het ontbreken van meerdere Palestijnse dorpen op de bezette Westelijke Jordaanoever.

 » Lees verder

Citizen Google: Wie ein Konzern den Journalismus dominiert

Citizen Google: Wie ein Konzern den Journalismus dominiert

26-09-18 08:12:00,

Werwolf ist ein Partyspiel. Der Spielleiter bestimmt einen der Spieler heimlich zum Bösewicht. Die anderen Teilnehmer müssen dann gemeinsam erraten, wer der Böse ist, und ihn aus dem Spiel werfen. Überlebt der Werwolf bis zum Schluss, hat er gewonnen. Werwolf, auch als Mafia bekannt, ist das Lieblingsspiel von Richard Gingras, dem Head of News bei Google. Gingras spielt gern mit Leuten, die früher Googles schärfste Kritiker waren: den Topmanagern und Chefinnen der Medienindustrie. ist unabhängig, werbefrei und fast vollständig durch unsere Leserinnen und Leser finanziert.

Richard GingrasRichard Gingras Alle Rechte vorbehalten Richard Gingras

Jedes Jahr veranstaltet Google ein Gipfeltreffen für die Branche, genannt Newsgeist. Im Vorjahr fand es in Kopenhagen statt, diesen Juni in Lissabon. Bei dem exklusiven Treffen lernt sich die Crème des europäischen Journalismus kennen. Auf der sorgfältig ausgewählten Gästeliste stehen etwa Spiegel-Online-Chefredakteurin Barbara Hans, Wikipedia-Gründer Jimmy Wales und viele große Namen der Branche.

Tagsüber debattieren die Gäste bei Newsgeist Fragen wie „What could Google do for news?“. Am Abend stehen Whiskey und Werwolf auf dem Programm. Gingras gibt dabei gern den Spielleiter. Den kann man nicht aus dem Spiel werfen und er behält die Kontrolle. Eine Rolle, in der sich Google im Journalismus gefällt.

Betriebssystem für den Journalismus

Seit einigen Jahren greift Google immer tiefer in einen Bereich, der für das Funktionieren der Demokratie unverzichtbar ist. Der Datenkonzern verändert den Journalismus. Wer Nachrichten sucht, tut das mit Googles Suche und Google News. Wer den letzten Ausrutscher des US-Präsidenten sehen will, findet ihn auf Youtube. Nachrichtenseiten verwenden Google Analytics, um Besucher zu zählen und speichern ihre Inhalte über Handy-optimierte AMP-Seiten auf Google-Servern. Wer für Medien zahlen möchte, kann das seit kurzem mit Subscribe with Google tun. Immer mehr Medien lagern zudem ihr Anzeigengeschäft an Google AdSense aus.

Kurz: Google baut mit seinen Produkten ein Ökosystem, dem sich kaum ein Medienunternehmen entziehen kann. Eine Art Betriebssystem für den Journalismus.

Google ist seit seiner Gründung 1998 zu einer der wertvollsten Firmen der Welt angewachsen. Der Marktwert der Mutterfirma Alphabet liegt über 800 Milliarden US-Dollar, bald könnte sie wie Apple und Amazon die Billion-Dollar-Grenze knacken. Haupteinnahmequelle von Google ist Online-Werbung. Doch der Konzern bietet auch Webdienste, Biotechnologie,

 » Lees verder

Google räumt politische Überlegungen zu Such-Ergebnissen ein

Google räumt politische Überlegungen zu Such-Ergebnissen ein

22-09-18 08:23:00,

Das Logo von Google. (Foto: dpa)

Das Logo von Google. (Foto: dpa)

Google-Mitarbeiter haben im vergangenen Jahr nach Wegen gesucht, um über die Suchmaschine des Unternehmens den Widerstand gegen die von US-Präsident Donald Trump betriebenen Einreiseverbote zu unterstützen. Das Wall Street Journal berichtet, die Angestellten hätten diskutiert, wie sich die Suchergebnisse derart steuern ließen, sodass Gegner des Einreisebanns leichter die Kontakte von Aktivistengruppen und Politikern finden könnten.

Laut Wall Street Journal hatte unmittelbar nach Inkrafttreten der ersten Version von Trumps Einreiseverboten gegen fünf Staaten im Januar 2017 bei Google die interne Diskussion über mögliche Gegenmaßnahmen begonnen. Dabei sei es auch darum gegangen, wie das Anzeigen „islamfeindlicher“ Internetseiten in der Suchmaschine unterbunden werden könnte.

Konkret sei es dabei um die Suchwörter „Islam“, „Muslim“ und „Iran“ gegangen. Eine ähnliche Diskussion wurde der Zeitung zufolge darüber geführt, wie sich verhindern ließe, dass die Wörter „Mexico“, „Hispanic“ und „Latino“ zu Seiten mit gegen hispanische Zuwanderer gerichteten Botschaften führten.

Der Konzern erklärt nun in einer an das WSJ übermittelten Stellungnahme, dass keine der damals in E-Mail-Wechseln ausgetauschten Ideen realisiert worden sei. „Google hat nie seine Suchergebnisse manipuliert oder irgendeines seiner Produkte modifiziert, um eine bestimme politische Weltsicht zu befördern“, unterstrich das Unternehmen.

Google hat in den vergangenen Jahren stets beteuert, völlig apolitisch vorzugehen. Allerdings ist die Wirkungsweise des Suchalgorithmus unbekannt. Es ist auch nicht bekannt, wie Google seinerseits gegen manipulierte Seiten vorgeht. In den Anfangsjahren der Suchmaschine waren sogenannte „Link-Farmen“ bekämpft worden, bei denen sich Betreiber selbst eine bessere Sichtbarkeit durch fiktive Seiten verschafften.

Der Zeitungsbericht dürfte US-Präsident Donald Trump und andere Konservative in ihrer Kritik an Google und weiteren Internetunternehmen bestärken. Sie werfen den Firmen vor, ihre Plattformen gezielt derart zu gestalten, dass linksliberale Inhalte bevorzugt und konservative Positionen benachteiligt würden.

Trump hatte Google erst vor wenigen Wochen hart attackiert. Wenn in der Suchmaschine des Konzerns die Wörter „Trump News“ eingegeben würden, erschienen nur negative Berichte über ihn, führte er ins Feld. Die Suche sei folglich „manipuliert“.

Dies sei „sehr gefährlich“ und möglicherweise illegal, beschwerte sich der Präsident Ende August. Er warf auch Facebook und Twitter vor, Konservative unfair zu behandeln, und drohte mit Konsequenzen. Justizminister Jeff Sessions leitete wenig später eine Untersuchung zum angeblich manipulativen Umgang der Online-Unternehmen mit politischen Inhalten ein.

Google hatte zusammen mit zahlreichen anderen Unternehmen des Internet- und Technologiesektors im Februar 2017 eine Stellungnahme bei Gericht gegen Trumps Einreisedekret eingereicht.

 » Lees verder