The Turkish invasion of Rojava, by Thierry Meyssan

the-turkish-invasion-of-rojava,-by-thierry-meyssan

21-10-19 09:28:00,

While the international community publicly fears the brutality of the Turkish intervention in northern Syria, it unofficially welcomes this intervention as the one and only solution to bring peace to the region. The war against Syria ends with one more crime. The fate of Idleb’s foreign mercenaries, the rabid jihadists during eight years of a particularly savage and cruel war, has yet to be determined.

JPEG - 57.5 kb
On October 15, 2016, President Erdoğan solemnly announced that his country would carry out the national oath of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Turkey, which already militarily occupies part of Cyprus and Iraq, claims part of Syria and Greece. Its army is preparing.

In 2011, Turkey organized, as requested, the migration of 3 million Syrians in order to weaken the country. Subsequently, it supported the Muslim Brotherhood and their jihadist groups, including Daesh. It looted Aleppo’s machine tools and set up counterfeit factories in the Islamic Emirate.

Intoxicated by its victories in Libya and Syria, Turkey has become the Protector of the Muslim Brotherhood, has moved closer to Iran and has challenged Saudi Arabia. It deployed military bases all around the Wahhabi Kingdom in Qatar, Kuwait and Sudan, then hired Western public relations firms and destroyed the image of Prince Mohamed Ben Salmane, particularly with the Kashoggi case[1]. Gradually, it considered expanding its power and aspired to become the 14th Mongolian empire. Misinterpreting this development as being the work of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan alone, the CIA made several attempts to assassinate him, even provoking the failed coup d’état in July 2016. Three years of uncertainty followed, ending in July 2019 when President Erdoğan decided to favour nationalism over Islamism[2]. Today, Turkey, although still a member of NATO, transports Russian gas into the European Union and buys S-400s in Moscow[3]. It watches over its minorities, including Kurds, and no longer demands they be Sunni Muslim, but only loyal to its homeland.

- During the summer, President Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw his troops from all of Syria, starting with the Rojava (already formulated on December 17, 2018), on the express condition of cutting the line of communication between Iran and Lebanon (which is new). Turkey entered into this commitment in exchange for a military occupation of the Syrian border strip from which terrorist artillery could bombard it.

 » Lees verder

Die türkische Invasion von Rojava, von Thierry Meyssan

die-turkische-invasion-von-rojava,-von-thierry-meyssan

17-10-19 08:00:00,

Wenn die internationale Gemeinschaft die Brutalität der türkischen Intervention in Nordsyrien auch öffentlich fürchtet, begrüßt sie inoffiziell diese Intervention, die einzige Lösung für eine Rückkehr zum Frieden in der Region. Der Krieg gegen Syrien endet mit einem weiteren Verbrechen. Das Schicksal der ausländischen Söldner von Idlib, der rabiaten Dschihadisten während acht Jahren eines besonders grausamen und grausamen Krieges, muss noch bestimmt werden.

JPEG - 57.5 kB
Am 15. Oktober 2016 kündigte Präsident Erdogan feierlich an, dass sein Land den nationalen Eid von Mustafa Kemal Atatürk verwirklichen werde. Die Türkei, die bereits einen Teil Zyperns und des Irak militärisch besetzt, beansprucht einen Teil Syriens und Griechenlands. Seine Armee bereitet sich vor.

Im Jahr 2011 organisierte die Türkei die Migration von 3 Millionen Syrern, wie man sie dazu aufgefordert hatte, um das Land zu schwächen. Später unterstützte sie die Muslimbruderschaft und ihre dschihadistischen Gruppen, einschließlich Daesch. Sie plünderte nebenbei die Werkzeugmaschinen Aleppos und richtete im islamischen Emirat gefälschte Fabriken ein.

Berauscht von ihren Siegen in Libyen und Syrien, wurde die Türkei zum Beschützer der Bruderschaft der Muslimbrüder, rückte an den Iran näher heran und trotzte Saudi-Arabien. Sie hat Militärstützpunkte rund um das wahhabitische Königreich in Katar, Kuwait und Sudan stationiert, dann westliche PR-Firmen engagiert und das Image von Prinz Mohamed Ben Salmane zerstört, besonders mit der Kashoggi-Affäre. [1]. Nach und nach erwog sie, ihre Macht auszuweiten und strebte danach, das 14. Mongol-Imperium zu werden. Die CIA, die diese Entwicklung als das Werk von Recep Tayyip Erdogan allein missinterpretierte, versuchte wiederholt, bis zum gescheiterten Putsch im Juli 2016, ihn zu ermorden. Es folgten drei Jahre der Ungewissheit, die im Juli 2019 endeten, als Präsident Erdogan beschloss, dem Nationalismus Vorrang vor dem Islamismus einzuräumen. [2]. Heute transportiert die Türkei, obwohl sie noch Mitglied der NATO ist, russisches Gas in die Europäische Union und kauft S-400 von Moskau [3]. Sie wacht über ihre Minderheiten, einschließlich der kurdischen, und verlangt nicht mehr, ein sunnitischer Muslim zu sein, sondern nur noch loyal zu seiner Heimat zu sein.

- Im Sommer kündigte Präsident Donald Trump seine Absicht an, seine Truppen aus ganz Syrien abzuziehen, beginnend mit Rojava (bereits am 17. Dezember 2018 formuliert), unter der ausdrücklichen Bedingung, die Kommunikationslinie zwischen dem Iran und dem Libanon (das ist jetzt neu) abzuschneiden. Die Türkei hat diese Zusage im Austausch für eine militärische Besetzung des syrischen Grenzstreifens gemacht,

 » Lees verder

The Migrant Invasion of Europe, Dawn of the New Multicultural Dystopia

the-migrant-invasion-of-europe-dawn-of-the-new-multicultural-dystopia

12-02-19 09:33:00,

“Migrant crisis? What crisis?

There is no migrant crisis!”
— Ian Birrell, British political pundit, in the Daily Mail

I do Mr Birrell a wrong by implying that he is unaware of the caravans of illegal immigrants pouring into Europe unrelentingly, mostly from five Muslim countries: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria and Eritrea.

He would have to be living on a different planet not to be aware that the “migrant crisis” is a crisis indeed: not so much for the migrants who have everything to gain if they can smuggle themselves into Europe, but it’s obviously a crisis to their European host countries who have everything to lose if the migrants should succeed in gaining a foothold here and, in the process, force their alien values and culture upon us.

This is what multiculturalism, if the truth be told, is all about: destroying the existing culture initially by dilution, and later on by subtle discrimination, verbal attacks, and, finally, by criminalisation.  Traditional values and the Christian ethos, once the prevailing norms in Europe and the US as late as the 1950s, are now quaint relics of the past, held in almost universal contempt by a thoroughly brutalised population of decadent philistines and tiresome trendies. Widespread neurosis, if not mental sickness, is rapidly becoming normative; and the vices of our ancestors are now the age’s new virtues.

Britain, new ‘Promised Land’ for Asylum Seekers

Mr Birrell, in the startling epigraph quote above […] was in fact referring to the 139 illegal immigrants, mostly from Iran, who had recently been caught sneaking into Britain. His sympathies lie with them entirely. He regards them as heroes for surviving torture and oppression in their own countries, for braving the storms and treacherous tides of the Mediterranean, and for slogging their way over mountain passes and through inhospitable enemy terrain in immense caravans of misery, finally to fetch up in the icy waters of the English Channel in a last desperate attempt to get to the land of their dreams—the glorious shores of Great Britain.

This is hardly a “crisis”, Mr Birrell opines. It is a cause for rejoicing.

Apart from Matteo Salvini, there is not a single influential politician anywhere in Western Europe who is lifting a finger to stop this ongoing invasion of our homelands by hordes of African,

 » Lees verder

“The Hague Invasion Act blijft gevaarlijk”

the-hague-invasion-act-blijft-gevaarlijk

06-02-19 10:53:00,

“Dreigementen gericht tegen het Internationaal Strafhof zijn dit keer veel serieuzer”, zegt William Pace van de Coalitie voor het Internationaal Strafhof. “Onder de huidige regering Trump is alles mogelijk.”

William Pace leidt de Coalitie voor het Internationaal Strafhof, een internationale koepel van meer dan 2500 maatschappelijke organisaties die pleiten voor een rechtvaardig, effectief en onafhankelijk Internationaal Strafhof. Hoewel het Strafhof wordt gesteund door maar liefst 123 lidstaten, inclusief alle landen in de Europese Unie, is het er niet in geslaagd om de Verenigde Staten, Rusland, China, India en Israël aan boord te krijgen. Sterker nog: sinds het Hof in 2002 van start ging, hebben de Verenigde Staten verschillende maatregelen genomen om ervoor te zorgen dat er nooit een Amerikaan voor de rechter kan verschijnen in Den Haag. In 2002 riep het Amerikaanse Congres de Amerikaanse Service-Members’ Protection Act in het leven, die al snel de bijnaam ‘The Hague Invasion Act’, ‘Den Haag Invasiewet’ kreeg. De wet machtigt de Amerikaanse president met alle middelen, zo nodig met geweld, personen te bevrijden die door of namens het Internationaal Strafhof gevangen worden gehouden. Bovendien bedreigde de Amerikaanse nationale veiligheidsadviseur John Bolton in september 2018 het Strafhof met sancties en beloofde hij functionarissen van het Strafhof strafrechtelijk te zullen vervolgen – indien de rechtbank een onderzoek zou beginnen naar mogelijke oorlogsmisdaden begaan door Amerikaanse militairen en inlichtingendiensten tijdens de oorlog in Afghanistan. Hetzelfde lot zou het Strafhof treffen als het Israël of een andere Amerikaanse bondgenoot in het beklaagdenbankje zou plaatsen.

Meneer Pace, denkt u dat de aanklaagster van het Strafhof, Fatou Bensouda, toestemming zal krijgen van de rechters van het Strafhof om een ​​onderzoek in te stellen naar Amerikaanse betrokkenheid bij oorlogsmisdaden en misdaden tegen de menselijkheid in Afghanistan?

Blijf op de hoogte van nieuws, opinie en achtergronden: Volg Novini!

Ik denk dat het erg moeilijk zal zijn voor de rechters om geen toestemming te verlenen voor het Afghaanse onderzoek. Maar dat is slechts een mening op basis van alle misdaden tegen de menselijkheid en de oorlogsmisdaden die daar sinds 2002 hebben plaatsgevonden. Het zou uiterst vreemd zijn als een onderzoek naar de Taliban en IS niet werd toegestaan. Ik weet echter niet of de rechters het onderdeel van de extraordinary renditions daarin zullen opnemen.

 » Lees verder

Agribusiness Invasion Threatens Indigenous of Paraguay’s Chaco Region

agribusiness-invasion-threatens-indigenous-of-paraguay8217s-chaco-region

23-12-18 04:25:00,

LGBTQ Rights

Sex Ed Programs Face Anti-LGBTQ Backlash

Environment & Health

Agribusiness Invasion Threatens Indigenous of Paraguay’s Chaco Region

Education & Youth

Normalization of Racist “Academia” Threatens Students of Color

Economy & Labor

Can the Working Class Change the World?

Politics & Elections

It’s Beginning to Look Like a (Very Long) Shutdown

War & Peace

How the Second Amendment’s Militia Became Part of Today’s Standing Army

The Paraguayan Chaco region has been home to various groups of Indigenous peoples for millennia. But over the past few years, the land has been invaded by agribusinesses for the purpose of unsustainable livestock production.

As a result, the Chaco is losing forests at a rate of 240,000 hectares per year. At the current rate of deforestation, in 24 years, all Chaco forest cover would all be gone, and the effects will be mostly irreversible. To make matters even worse, the land is increasingly being covered in genetically modified soy and the toxic agrochemicals that go hand-in-hand with it. The soy is primarily produced as feedstock for factory farms in Europe and other parts of the world. Cattle ranchers and soy planters have stolen Indigenous land in the Chaco and forced its people into slave labor.

Every day, the Chaco’s inhabitants see immense convoys of ships and barges passing before their eyes, carrying away their resources to feed others in faraway places, with the profits of this trade remaining beyond their reach.

The unjust and exploitative trade rules that have caused the agribusiness takeover of the Chaco are set to worsen further with the proposed European Union-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the Latin American bloc Mercosur, which includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. It is the world’s fourth-largest trading bloc. This deal will give corporations even more power to prioritize producing steak, pork and chicken for European consumers, while the lives of the Chaco’s inhabitants will remain submerged in poverty and hunger.

Stay in the loop

Never miss the news and analysis you care about.

Optional Member Code

Your Email

The photos below offer a glimpse into the lives of the Chaco’s Indigenous people and the struggles they face.

 » Lees verder

USA – The World’s Invasion Nation

usa-the-worlds-invasion-nation

11-12-18 04:02:00,

Or How Big Brother Grips Americans’ Minds to Support Invasions
Eric Zuesse

Image source.

On November 29th, Gallup headlined “Democrats Lead Surge in Belief US Should Be World Leader” and reported that “Three-fourths (75%) of Americans today think the United States has ‘a special responsibility to be the leading nation in world affairs,’ up from 66% in 2010. The surge is driven by Democrats, whose belief in this idea has increased from 61% eight years ago to 81% now.” This finding comes even after the lie-based and catastrophic US invasions of Iraq in 2003, and of Libya in 2011 (and of so many others, such as Afghanistan, where the US and Sauds created the Taliban in 1979). Americans — now even increasingly — want ‘their’ (which is actually America’s billionaires’) Government to be virtually the world’s government, policing the world. They want this nation’s Government to be determining what international laws will be enforced around the world, and to be enforcing them.

Most Americans don’t want the United Nations to have power over the US (its billionaires’) Government, but instead want the US Government (its billionaires) to have power over the United Nations (which didn’t authorize any of those evil, lie-based, US invasions).

Not only would doing this bankrupt all constructive domestic functions (health, education, infrastructure, etc.) of the US federal Government, but it would also increase the global carnage, as if the US Government hasn’t already been doing enough of that, for decades now.

The leadership for this supremacist craving comes straight from America’s top, not from the masses that are being sampled by the Gallup organization, who only reflect it — they are duped by their leaders. Here is how US President Barack Obama (a Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2009, for nothing at all but his ‘kindly’ but insincere verbiage when he had been a candidate) stated this widespread delusional American belief in American global moral supremacy, when addressing the graduating class at West Point Military Academy, on 28 May 2014:

The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation*. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come…America must always lead on the world stage.

 » Lees verder

The Planned Invasion of Canada by the US. Political Meddling into the Affairs of a Sovereign Nation – Global Research

The Planned Invasion of Canada by the US. Political Meddling into the Affairs of a Sovereign Nation – Global Research

04-10-18 07:27:00,

Introduction and Update

While the mainstream media has its eyes riveted on alleged Russian interference in Canada, without a shred of evidence, recent developments pertaining to the enactment of NAFTA 2.0, visibly point to US meddling in Canada internal affairs. 

In fact routine US meddling is part of  Canada’s history since 1866, one year before Confederation.

The Bill to Annex Canada into the US approved by the US Congress in 1866 preceded the 1867 Alaska Purchase from Russia and the subsequent establishment of the Canadian Confederation under The British North America Act of 1867.

Who is a threat to Canada’s national sovereignty. Russia or the United States?

“The Russians are Coming” to Canada.

According to Canada’s media the Kremlin wants to create divisions within Canadian Society which will contribute to undermining Canadian democracy.

According to NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre Centre for Excellence (CEO) based in Latvia, the Kremlin is intent upon disrupting Canada’s 2019 federal elections.

The following article first published by GR in 2005 (with some recent additions) reviews something which most Canadians are unaware of:

From the late 1920s until the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the US had plans to invade Canada. 

Confirmed by declassified documents, a “humanitarian” warfare agenda had been contemplated in the course of the 1930s.

In a bitter irony, the use of Chemical weapons were to be used against Canadian civilians with General Douglas McArthur (who ordered the fire bombing of Japanese cities during World War II) in charge of  designing the bombing raids against Vancouver.

This is no laughing matter, The relevant national security documents were declassified in 1974.

Michel Chossudovsky, October 4, 2018

***

A 2005 Washington Post article entitled:

Raiding the Icebox; Behind Its Warm Front, the United States Made Cold Calculations to Subdue Canada, by Peter Carlson (30 December 2005),

focuses on a detailed US Plan to Invade Canada entitled “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red,”   It was formulated in the late 1920s, approved by the US War Department in 1930,

 » Lees verder