Me, Myself and Media 57 – And the winner is…Bill Gates! |


23-05-20 06:00:00,

Dieser Artikel ist auch als kostenlose MP3 für Dich verfügbar!

Download MP3

Die Macht der Eliten des 20. Jahrhunderts wurde in der analogen Welt realisiert. Man wurde reich und damit einflussreich, indem man die Märkte mit Konsumgütern überschwemmte. Das 21. Jahrhundert wird von den Pionieren der digitalen Welt beherrscht. Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon und Microsoft übernehmen aktuell das Ruder. Ihr Credo: Daten sind das neue Gold, aber auch nur, wenn man durch sie die Kontrolle über die analoge Welt übernimmt. Da kein digitaler Player sich den ganzen Kuchen einverleiben kann, konzentrieren sich die Großen auf einzelne Sektoren. Bill Gates, der Gründer von Microsoft, aktuelles Privatvermögen über 90 Milliarden Dollar, hat sich mit seiner Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation schon vor Jahren auf das Thema „Gesundheit“ spezialisiert. Gates setzt dabei auf Impfstoffe. Er hält an allen namhaften Pharma-Konzernen oder Impfstoff-Herstellern riesige Aktienpakete oder aber ist als finanzieller Unterstützer an diversen Forschungseinrichtungen beteiligt.

Auch bei der WHO gilt Gates als heimlicher Chef. Die WHO wird zu 80% über den privaten Sektor finanziert, also auch die Pharma-Branche und Bill Gates ist innerhalb der WHO der größte Einzelspender. Wenn die WHO eine Impflicht empfiehlt, wenn sie auf einen Covid-19-Impfstoff besteht, hat Bill Gates erheblichen Anteil an dieser Forderung, denn die WHO ist von Gates-Leuten durchsetzt. Aber auch an der Spitzte der EU beeinflussen Mitarbeiter, die direkt von Gates kommen, die Entscheidungen der Europäischen Kommission. Gates ist überall. Im Kanzleramt sowieso.

In der 57. Ausgabe von MMM fordern wir einen Corona-Untersuchungsausschuss und das aus einem simplen Grund. Wir können nachweisen, dass das Kanzleramt von einer korrupten Pharma-Clique gekapert wurde, deren Ziel es ist, die weltweiten Standards für Gesundheit zu diktieren, um so einen digitalen Kontrollstaat zu errichten. RKI, Drosten, Merkel & Co sind nur Figuren, die man benutzt, um eine perfide Agenda durchzudrücken.

Die Medien habe sich zu Komplizen dieser Politik degradieren lassen und greifen jeden an, der z.B. darauf hinweist, dass das Grundgesetz in weiten Teilen in den Lockdown geschickt wurde. Was wir uns nach dieser Sendung wünschen ist eindeutig: Es müssen juristische Schritte gegen diejenigen in die Wege geleitet werden, die dieses Komplott,

 » Lees verder

US media schtum on Assange’s plight despite 3 years of ‘flamboyant devotion’ to protecting press freedom – Greenwald


23-04-20 04:44:00,

Award-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald has criticized the US media for its deafening silence on the ongoing persecution of Julian Assange, despite the years it has spent railing against the Trump administration.

Founder of The Intercept and a long-time Assange supporter, Greenwald despaired at the apparent double standards and performative hyperbole of the US media establishment, which has long played up perceived persecution at the hands of US President Donald Trump.  

And yet, journalists across the news media spectrum have been largely unwilling to openly defend the WikiLeaks founder, who faces extradition and judgement in the US courts.

Also on
Spanish firm spying on Assange stole his son’s dirty diaper and BLACKMAILED Ecuadorian diplomat with NUDE PHOTOS – court papers

“The US media spent 3 years flamboyantly proclaiming their devotion to protect press freedoms, yet now ignore what is, by far, the greatest Trump-era threat posed to a free press: the Trump DoJ’s [Department of Justice’s] prosecution and attempted extradition of Julian Assange,” Greenwald tweeted

He then singled out the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Executive Editor at The Washington Post Marty Baron as among the few voices in US media daring to raise their heads above the parapet and cry foul over the attempted extradition of Assange from the UK to the US, for exposing gross abuses of power and potential war crimes by the US military in its so-called ‘War on Terror’ in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.  

Responding to claims that Assange had “offended Hillary” and that this was why he had been abandoned by the US media establishment, Greenwald responded that it was, in fact, Jeff Sessions and Mike Pompeo that were behind Assange’s ongoing persecution, neither of whom could be considered a friend to Hillary Clinton. 

The people behind Assange’s prosecution – Jeff Sessions & Mike Pompeo – hate Hillary. This has nothing to do with that (except they knew liberals would be on their side for that reason). This is about punishing him for 2010 publications exposing US war crimes & other corruption.

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 23, 2020

Theorizing as to the apparent indifference to Assange’s plight,

 » Lees verder

This is how UK media covers Britain’s Covid-19 response & that is how it covers Russia’s (is this FAIR journalism?)


19-04-20 12:50:00,

As humanity faces a common enemy in the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK media is zooming in on the usual foe – the Russians, whose pandemic measures are portrayed as tyrannical and ineffective, even when they’re the same as Britain’s.

With global coronavirus cases nearing 2.3 million and deaths passing 157,000, government responses to the pandemic have been evaluated by the world’s press. However, not every government has been judged equally, and when we look at how the British media treats Russia’s response, the tone is biased.

Lockdown: Russians under Putin’s thumb, Brits embrace ‘community spirit’

Late last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his country’s 147 million citizens to “stay at home and not travel.” Putin’s directive fell short of a full lockdown, however, and stricter orders have since been applied on a regional basis, with Moscow’s among the harshest.

Read more

Covid-19 compensation: Busybody police waste precious resources on meaningless tasks

The UK press saw totalitarianism on the horizon, with the BBC accusing Putin of “using the pandemic to tighten control.” The British Broadcaster reported that the lockdown measures have left ordinary Russians “confused and wary.”

Not in Britain. When Prime Minister Boris Johnson imposed a legally binding lockdown in late March, the only criticism leveled at the PM was that the draconian measures may have come too late. Though emergency legislation passed since then grants healthcare workers the power to detain “potentially infectious persons” for as long as they see fit, and though police officers across the country have eagerly played the petty tyrant, the British people are quite happy with the ‘new normal’, or so the story goes.

Amid a crackdown on everything from dog walking to sunbathing, “community spirit is making a comeback,” the Telegraph reported on Thursday. British columnists cheered on the resurgence of the “blitz spirit,” and the media reported that the public would be completely happy living under lockdown until July.

Enforcement: Russians get ‘cybergulag’, Brits get smart monitoring

When Moscow’s city government trialled an app to monitor the movements of coronavirus patients last month, the Guardian described this privacy-invading technology as a move toward a “Cybergulag,” quoting an opposition politician.

 » Lees verder

Western Media Focusses On Big Pharma’s Search for a Coronavirus Vaccine While Suppressing Coverage of High Dose Intravenus Vitamin C to Save Lives in China – Global Research


27-03-20 08:21:00,

Not a day passes without some hyped up media story of how big-pharma is racing to the rescue of humanity with its search for a coronavirus vaccine. There are over 40 companies now searching for a vaccine. Collectively they are spending huge sums of money supported by lavish amounts of tax payer cash. Estimates of how soon a vaccine can be produced vary wildly but most estimates agree that it is unlikely to happen this year. It goes without saying that the first to market with a usable vaccine stands to make billions of dollars.

The mainstream media, scientific and political establishments are completely under the spell of big pharma. Governments reassure the public that they’re doing everything in their power to protect them with a variety of measures. These range from mass lock downs and trillion dollar bailouts for big business to limited amounts of helicopter money for the citizens of wealthier countries.

Regardless of where you live if you have to go to hospital with symptoms of the coronavirus the key question facing you is: will you be able to leave walking out front door or will you end up being wheeled out the basement back door?

The mainstream media in cahoots with governments and the medical establishment are suppressing any news regarding the use of a cheap, safe and easy to produce treatment for coronavirus patients. Maybe its because this treatment is being used in Chinese hospitals to save lives. Let’s face it there has been no let up in Cold War 2.0 during the current pandemic.

Dr. Andrew W. Saul, Editor in chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, sums up the Western big pharma approach nicely when he says:

“Medical orthodoxy obsessively focuses on searching for a vaccine and/or drug for coronavirus COVID-19). While they are looking for what would be fabulously profitable approaches, we have with vitamin C an existing, plausible, clinically demonstrated method to treat what coronavirus patients die from: severe acute respiratory syndrome, or pneumonia.’’

On 17 March a group of Chinese physicians held a video conference to discuss the use of high dose intravenous vitamin C for patients with moderate to severe cases of corona virus. The keynote speaker at this meeting was Dr.

 » Lees verder

US Media Defends Al Qaeda in Syria | New Eastern Outlook


26-03-20 11:52:00,


When is a terrorist group not a terrorist group? Apparently when US foreign policy requires it not to be. This is precisely the case regarding Al Qaeda’s Syrian branch – Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS) – the most recent rebrand of Jabhat Al Nusra – which currently occupies the northern Syrian governorate of Idlib.

The US corporate media has recently attempted to generate public sympathy for HTS – as well as animosity toward Syrian, Russian, and Iranian forces seeking to liberate the supposedly one million people trapped under the terrorist organization’s rule.

Another factor behind US media support for HTS is the necessity to explain why NATO member Turkey is providing direct military and material support for a US-designated terrorist organization, and why the US itself is in turn providing Turkey support to do so.

Articles have appeared in Newsweek – for example – framing Russian opposition to negotiations with HTS as negative – and echoing US State Department efforts to support the terrorist organization despite it appearing on Washington’s official Foreign Terrorist Organization designation list.

The article titled, “Russia Warns Against Any U.S. Talks with Militant Group It’s Bombing in Syria,” is actually referring to Al Qaeda’s HTS front when it refers to the “militant group” Russia is bombing in Syria.

Newsweek places Russian statements regarding the US designation of HTS as a terrorist organization in quotes as if to question the veracity of the claim.

However, a visit to the US State Department’s own website reveals a 2018 statement titled, “Amendments to the Terrorist Designations of al-Nusrah Front,” which openly admits:

The Department of State has amended the designation of al-Nusrah Front – an al-Qa’ida affiliate in Syria – to include Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and other aliases. These aliases have been added to al-Nusrah Front’s designations as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) under Executive Order 13224.

In January 2017, al-Nusrah Front launched the creation of HTS as a vehicle to advance its position in the Syrian uprising and to further its own goals as an al-Qa’ida affiliate.

 » Lees verder

Media Watch: Groundbreaking UN Torture Report Shunned by Mainstream – Activist Post


25-03-20 07:52:00,

By Janet Phelan

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer, has issued a report which gives official acknowledgement—possibly for the first time—to aspects of a torture program that has been launched covertly in the US and elsewhere.

But you wouldn’t know it if you read mainstream media. There has been not a word concerning Melzer’s report in the Associated Press, Reuters, the NY Times, the Washington Post, ad nauseum.

The report, entitled “Torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment,” deals primarily with delineating the differences and commonalities between physical and psychological torture. In so doing, the report devotes a section to what Melzer is calling “cyber torture.” Melzer writes:

State, corporate actors and organized criminals not only have the capacity to conduct cyber operations inflicting severe suffering on countless individuals, but may well decide to do so for any of the purposes of torture.

In a nod to the multiplicity of reports that the SR recently received claiming gang stalking and electronic torture, the report goes on to state that “cybertechnologies can also be used …through intimidation, harassment, surveillance, public shaming and defamation.” The report also expresses concern that cybertechnology may be employed to torture through ….” medical implants, and, conceivably nano- or neurotechnological devices.”

However, this reporter could locate only two established news outlets which even covered the SR’s report, The Guardian  and Al Jazeera. At the time of this writing, the large human rights NGOs, which generally include addressing torture as part of their mandate — Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights First, Physicians for Human Rights, Center for Victims of Torture — have not given any acknowledgment to the SR’s report on their websites or in press releases. Nor did they respond to requests for comment on the report.

The use of electronic and internet-based devices for the purposes of harassment and worse of ordinary citizens has exploded in the last decade or so. While a few local TV networks have ventured into new territory by running some segments on this phenomenon, this has largely been seen as the dominion of “tin foil hats.” A couple examples of rare TV coverage follow:

When the NY Times covered this issue,

 » Lees verder

Me, Myself and Media 56 – Shutdown oder shut up? |


23-03-20 11:22:00,


So Hawzhin Azeez ‘an die vermeintlichen Anti-Imperialisten im Westen’ wie der «Friedensbewegung und deren Medien (wie KenFM usw.) und Gefolgschaft. Und dies gilt auch über den Nahen und Mittleren Osten hinaus und nun auch bei uns in Westeuropa.

Doch anstelle von konkreter, verbindlicher Loyalität und Solidarität schlägt man sich mit schönen Worten, unverbindlichen, unkonkreten geostrategischen und wirtschaftlichen Theorien, Hypothesen, Analysen, Spekulationen und dergleichen herum.

Meine Aufforderungen die verbrecherischen Sanktionen unserer Regierungen welche sehr viele Menschenleben kosten, wie jene gegen die syrische Bevölkerung, zu verweigern und stattdessen die Bevölkerung konkret zu unterstützen (Siehe Titel) werden jeweils bei KenFM mit eisigem Schweigen beantwortet (Man kann sich dazu nicht einmal zu einem ‘Like’ aufraffen!). Dies, obwohl unter anderen die syrische Bevölkerung Unterstützung, also Solidarität, nötiger hätte denn je. Ebenso nicht beantwortet und mit keinerlei ‘Likes’ unterstütz bleiben meine Hinweise betr. Emigranten- Muslim/Islam-Feindlichkeit welche auch Menschenleben kosten und viel Unheil anrichten. Es ist ganz so, als ob dies alles nicht existieren würde. Dies bei KenFM!

Von Loyalität und Solidarität will man offensichtlich so wenig wissen wie von Menschenrechten. Sei es mit den Syrern, mit den französischen ‘Gilets jaunes’ und Generalstreikenden, sei es mit den italienischen ‘Sardinen’ und ähnlichen, oder gar mit den Muslimen im eigenen Land.

Dazu Markus Heizmann in «Zur Anatomie des Imperialismus»: «Solidarität ist internationale Solidarität oder es ist keine Solidarität. Staaten und Gemeinschaften die vom Imperialismus und seinen Vasallen angegriffen werden, sind auf unsere Solidarität angewiesen. Solidarität ist Zärtlichkeit der Völker!»

Verweigerung der Aufnahme von Flüchtlingen, Emigranten sei es durch die Regierung, sei es durch die EU wird befürwortet, unterstützt. Artikel, Kommentare mit subtiler Fremden-, Flüchtling-, Emigranten-, Muslimfeindlichkeit erzielen hohe Zustimmung, Besucherzahlen und ‘Likes’. Dies von der weit überwiegenden Mehrheit bei den Medien der «Friedensbewegung» die sich dazu noch als Minderheit und Opfer hinstellt und selbstbemitleidet.

Die offizielle Version von 9/11 wird abgelehnt, doch das von unseren Regierungen und Geheimdiensten dazu vorgegebene Feindbild Muslime/Islam wird gehorsamst, unterwürfigst übernommen und gepflegt obwohl Muslime mit 9/11 nicht das Geringste zu tun haben.

 » Lees verder

Ongekende media oorlog achter nieuws over #corona virus –


28-02-20 07:50:00,

Foto 123rf

We zijn de afgelopen periode overspoeld met nieuws over het corona virus. Een panel van deskundigen verklaarde gisteren tijdens een special van de NOS over het virus dat er geen reden tot paniek is. De grote vraag die onbeantwoord blijft is, hoe het komt dat desondanks een wereldwijde media hysterie over het virus is uitgebroken? Met name in de VS woedt een media oorlog op ongekende schaal met veel kritische media kanalen die uit de lucht zijn gehaald. Wat vertelt de NOS ons niet?

Er is een tijdelijke restraining order in California waarmee opdracht is gegeven om sites met “Corona virus conspiracy theories” uit de lucht te halen.
Hierop zijn Infowars, Natural News, Zerohedge (tijdelijk) verwijderd van Twitter, Facebook en You Tube. Bovenstaande video is verspreid via
De doodzonde die deze sites hebben begaan is met ander dan gewenst nieuws te komen. Zo melden zij onder andere dat het corona virus door de mens is gemaakt in China als biologisch wapen. Volgens deze media is de waarheid het eerste slachtoffer van corona.

Wil je desondanks toch op de hoogte blijven via de onafhankelijke Amerikaanse media, dan kan je kijken op

Wat heeft het corona virus met vaccinaties te maken?

Nog opmerkelijker is wat Del Bigtree meldt in gesprek met het Canadese onafhankelijke nieuwsmedium Press for Truth. Dit is overigens wel via YouTube te ontvangen, wat dan weer lijkt te kloppen met de mededeling van de hierboven genoemde Amerikaanse sites die verwijderd zijn van enkele sociale media platforms.

Bigtree, ex medische talkshow host bij CBS en vaccin expert, maakt drie opvallende opmerkingen.

Volgens Del Bigtree is de meest gevaarlijke trend van het moment in de VS dat mensen de mond gesnoerd worden wanneer zij zich op een andere manier uitlaten over het virus dan de officiële regeringsversie. Het enige nieuws over het corona virus mag van het CDC komen, het Amerikaanse Centrum voor ziekte beheersing en preventie. De rest moet gecensureerd worden en blijkbaar is de censurering in volle gang.

 » Lees verder

OSCE media freedom rep calls on UK not to extradite Assange due to ‘excessive’ US prison sentence


23-02-20 04:46:00,

The UK should not extradite Julian Assange, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has argued, because he faces an excessive prison sentence in the US and his publications were in the public interest.

OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Harlem Desir expressed concern over Assange’s upcoming extradition hearing at London’s Woolwich Crown Court on Monday. He called on UK authorities to refuse to hand over Assange to Washington, citing the “disproportionate prison sentence, up to a total of 175 years, that he could potentially face if extradited and convicted.”

Desir argued that WikiLeaks has provided “important investigative reports and news reporting” and Assange’s extradition would have a “chilling effect” on freedom of expression and media freedom. Assange has been charged under the Espionage Act over the publication of leaked documents that revealed possible war crimes by the US military in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Also on
John Pilger: Julian Assange must be freed, not betrayed

Activists and watchdog groups have expressed concern about Assange’s treatment at the hands of UK authorities as he awaits his fate. His detention at HM Prison Belmarsh – which at one point involved solitary confinement and other excessive measures – has been repeatedly criticized as inhumane and bordering on torture.

On Saturday, thousands of people protested near the British Parliament against Assange’s looming extradition. The rally was attended by Assange’s father Richard, as well as WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson, fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, and rock musician and co-founder of Pink Floyd Roger Waters.

Also on
Govt wants ‘what looks like a free press’, not ‘dissidents’: Eno, Westwood & others speak about fighting for Assange’s freedom

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

 » Lees verder

The CIA and the Media – Global Research


18-02-20 07:48:00,

After leaving The Washington Post in 1977, Carl Bernstein spent six months looking at the relationship of the CIA and the press during the Cold War years. His 25,000-word cover story, published in Rolling Stone on October 20, 1977, is reprinted below.


In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America’s leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services—from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go‑betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without‑portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring‑do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full‑time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s leading news organizations.

The history of the CIA’s involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:

  • The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence‑gathering employed by the CIA. Although the Agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalist‑operatives are still posted abroad.
  • Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950s and 1960s with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.

 » Lees verder

Me, Myself and Media 55 – Simulierte Demokratie |


16-02-20 08:15:00,

Dieser Artikel ist auch als kostenlose MP3 für Dich verfügbar!

Download MP3

Tabubruch Demokratie!

Bis zum Gau von Thüringen galt die Regierungsform Demokratie offiziell als Herrschaft des Volkes. Wahr ist, das Volk hat nichts zu sagen und wurde seit 1949 durch die sogenannte Repräsentative Demokratie an der Nase herumgeführt.

Anders als in der Schweiz, kann der deutsche Wähler nicht direkt die Personen in politische Ämter wählen, von denen er dann über Jahre beherrscht wird, stattdessen wählt der Deutsche Parteien.

Was diese Parteien nach der Wahl mit der abgegebenen Wählerstimme tun oder lassen, kann der Wähler nur noch passiv beobachten. Korrigieren kann er nichts, auch nicht, wenn die Partei Null ihres Parteiprogramms umsetzt, für das man sie seinerzeit gewählt hatte. Die Parteiendemokratie hat in Wahrheit nur ein Ziel, sie soll den Bürger soweit es geht von der Macht fernhalten. Begründet wird das damit, dass Parteien besser wüssten, was zu tun sei und dass auch innerhalb des Parteien-Apparates demokratische Prozesse verbindlich wären. Ohne absolute Mehrheiten käme keine Partei umhin, mit der politischen Konkurrenz zu koalieren, um eine Regierung zu bilden. Das wäre der Garant dafür, dass auch in der Parteiendemokratie der Wille der Mehrheit des Volkes umgesetzt würde, denn nur mit der Mehrheit z.B. innerhalb der Landtage, ließe sich eine Regierung bilden. Soweit die Theorie.

Seit Thüringen wissen wir, dass auch diese Theorie nur gilt, wenn es den etablierten Parteien oder dem Kanzleramt passt. Wenn nicht, muss die Wahl, so Merkel, „rückgängig“ gemacht werden.

Warum? Weil nicht sein kann, was nicht sein darf. In Thüringen wurde der FDP-Kandidat Kemmerich mit den Stimmen von CDU, FDP und AfD zum offiziellen Nachfolger des Rot-Rot-Grünen Vorgängers Bodo Ramelow gewählt. Er hatte zwar nur eine Stimme mehr, aber das spielte in der Repräsentativen Demokratie nie eine Rolle.

Seit Thüringen ist das anders. Wenn diese Stimme von der „falschen“ Partei kommt, ist die Wahl „ungültig“ und alle sprechen von Tabubruch. Auch wenn einem das Zustandekommen des neuen Ministerpräsidenten nicht gefällt, die Wahl war juristisch einwandfrei und der Tabubruch besteht nicht darin, die Stimmen der AfD gebraucht zu haben, um Ramelow abzulösen, sondern in der Tatsache,

 » Lees verder

How Government And Media Are Prepping America For A Failed 2020 Election


02-02-20 08:41:00,

Authored by Whitney Webb via,

As World War II drew to a close in Europe, British philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote that “neither a man nor a crowd nor a nation can be trusted to act humanely or to think sanely under the influence of a great fear.”

Though numerous examples in the post-World War II era have proven Russell’s point, perhaps one of the best examples was the U.S. public’s willingness to swallow lie after lie about Saddam Hussein’s Iraq due to the climate of fear that followed the September 11 attacks. Those lies, propagated by dubious intelligence, government officials and a compliant media, resulted in catastrophes – large and small, both abroad and at home.

Today, an analogous narrative is being crafted by many of the same players – both in media and government – yet it has avoided scrutiny, even from independent media.

Over the past several months and with a renewed zeal in just the last few weeks, anonymous intelligence officials, dubious “experts” and establishment media outlets have crafted a narrative about the coming “chaos” of the 2020 election, months before it takes place. Per that narrative, certain state actors will use specific technologies to target the “American mind” in order to undermine the coming presidential election. The narrative holds that those efforts will be so successful that the U.S. will never recover as a democracy.

Though these anonymous government sources and their stenographers have already named the countries who will be responsible and the technologies they will use, they also admit that no evidence yet exists to back up these claims, meaning they are — at best — pure speculation.

Headlines such as “Hackers Are Coming for the 2020 Election — And We’re Not Ready,” “Basically Every US National Security Leader Is Warning About Foreign Interference In The 2020 Election,” and “U.S. intel agencies: Russia and China plotting to interfere in 2020 election” have become increasingly common, despite no available evidence, as have warnings that the American public is defenseless against the old scourge of “fake news” and the new scourge of “deep fakes.” Some media reports have gone so far to say that actual foreign meddling isn’t even necessary as merely the fear of foreign meddling could be enough to upend the American political system beyond repair.

 » Lees verder

Social Media Networks Vow to CENSOR “Misinformation” About Coronavirus – Activist Post


01-02-20 05:13:00,

By Daisy Luther

Yesterday, social media giants like Facebook and Twitter, and search engine Google announced their intentions to censor – um, crack down on – so-called “misinformation” about the coronavirus that is spreading across the globe.

Before we get started here, admittedly, there’s some absolutely terrible advice out there about preventing or curing coronavirus. There are some really wild stories about the origin of the virus which may or may not be true. But the issue here is that social media networks are setting themselves up as the arbiters of truth, making it seem as though the rest of us are incapable of separating good information from bad information.

Facebook is taking action.

Kang-Xing Jin, Facebook’s head of health, wrote:

Our global network of third-party fact-checkers are continuing their work reviewing content and debunking false claims that are spreading related to the coronavirus. When they rate information as false, we limit its spread on Facebook and Instagram and show people accurate information from these partners. We also send notifications to people who already shared or are trying to share this content to alert them that it’s been fact-checked.

We will also start to remove content with false claims or conspiracy theories that have been flagged by leading global health organizations and local health authorities that could cause harm to people who believe them. We are doing this as an extension of our existing policies to remove content that could cause physical harm. We’re focusing on claims that are designed to discourage treatment or taking appropriate precautions. This includes claims related to false cures or prevention methods — like drinking bleach cures the coronavirus — or claims that create confusion about health resources that are available. We will also block or restrict hashtags used to spread misinformation on Instagram, and are conducting proactive sweeps to find and remove as much of this content as we can. (source)

So, don’t worry, friends. “Independent fact-checkers” from the Ministry of Truth will protect you from conspiracy theories and false claims.

Maarten Schenk from Lead Stories, a fact-checking organization working with Facebook, scoffed at some of the “conspiracy theories” he’s seen in a comment to CNN.

 » Lees verder

Part 22: The Role of the Media — Act II


27-01-20 08:37:00,

fingerprint shure 500Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., here resumes her series of articles for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth that address a defining issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent — or Worse — About 9/11?” Each installment of this series has been a synthesis of academic research and clinical observations on the subject.

DISCLAIMER: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is dedicated to researching and disseminating scientific information about the destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, and does not speculate as to the identity or motives of the perpetrators. In this series of articles, any reference to names or motives of the attackers, made by either the author or the individuals she quotes, is a personal opinion and not the viewpoint of AE911Truth.

jefferson quote 768

In the last installment of this series, Part 21, “The Role of the Media: Act 1 – Whatever Happened to Investigative Journalists?” I summarized the stories of four “witnesses” — three award-winning investigative journalists whose essays appeared in Kristina Borjesson’s 2002 anthology, Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press, plus FBI whistleblower-turned-independent-journalist Sibel Edmonds. In that piece, I let each journalist take the witness stand, so to speak. One by one, they revealed the insurmountable hurdles they faced in their efforts to inform the public of the facts buried under the rubble of official lies about the most newsworthy events of our time.

My conclusion from their witness testimony was that censorship is caused by two intertwined influences: (1) the powerful people who sit in the highest seats of our society’s mainstream institutions and (2) the corporate structure itself. Of the latter, I wrote:

Our global media have become subsidiaries of massive corporate conglomerates that do business in many other industries, including the manufacture of weapons for the military. These mega-corporations, in turn, contribute huge sums of money to members of Congress as well as enormous research grants to universities. In his farewell address, President Eisenhower warned of the military-industrial complex.1 But he surely knew that, in reality, the U.S. is saddled with the military-industrial-congressional-academic-media complex that is working overtime to achieve its own narrow goals,

 » Lees verder

The War on Media Comes Home – Activist Post


13-01-20 05:27:00,

By Jon Rappoport

“Instead of scurrying into a corner and wailing about what media are doing to us, one should charge straight ahead and kick them in the electrodes.” Marshall McLuhan, 1960.

For the past 35 years, I’ve been pointing out “flaws” in major media presentations of the news. Specific lies, specific omissions, specific strategies intended to keep the public from knowing the truth about a variety of life and death matters.

The word “media” comes from the Latin, meaning “middle.” And “middle” suggests there are two ends. The media are between two ends. What are they?

Well, when you back up a few steps from The News, you see that elite anchors and their colleagues are interposed between EVENTS and THE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THESE EVENTS. The anchors and reporters are the eyes, ears, and mouths for the population. This, at best, is a highly precarious set-up.

Why would anyone in his right mind place blind faith in these newspeople? The answer is simple. No one who gives that faith is in his right mind. He has surrendered his mind.

Surrendered it to the need for authority. “You have to trust somebody.” This is the rube and yokel factor. “The man behind the news desk looks good. He speaks well. He seems sure of himself. He represents a large successful organization. Therefore, he wouldn’t lie. Truth is his job description. If he’s lying, then what else about reality might be a lie? I’m not looking for a sinkhole to fall into. I want to keep my balance. The anchor helps me do that. I have to maintain a basic trust in my fellow man. It’s part of my religion…”

Then there is a psychological need for The One. More-than-one takes a person into a realm of uncertainty, and who wants that? “You mean I have to choose? I have to make distinctions? Forget it. Give me Lester Holt. Give me the anchor who looks the cleanest. Give me the one friend above all others. I have the one God, so I want the one anchor.”

But here’s the trick. No one who places his blind faith in the one anchor wants to admit that this is what he’s doing.

 » Lees verder

Tired of media’s Pentagon spin? Lee Camp outlines 6 things you aren’t being told about the US assassination of Soleimani (VIDEO)


09-01-20 01:07:00,

Media outlets have omitted aspects about the US assassination of Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani that don’t fit Washington’s narrative, comedian Lee Camp has argued. He’s debunked the Pentagon spin so you don’t have to.

The host of Redacted Tonight has listed six things about the highly controversial killing that the media has either ignored completely or under-reported, including the not-so-convenient fact that Soleimani had come to Baghdad to hold de-escalation talks with Saudi Arabia – before being killed by a US drone.

And what about the fact that the US carried out this strike without the permission of its democratic ‘ally’, Iraq, or the completely unsubstantiated accusation that Soleimani’s assassination was justified because he was plotting against the United States?

Camp tears into the media’s uncritical and all-too-familiar narrative, and asks: Do we really want to enter into a war that would likely kill millions of people, only to find out it was all based on lies – again?

Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.

 » Lees verder

Is Social Media The New Tobacco?


28-12-19 05:19:00,

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

If we set out to design a highly addictive platform that optimized the most toxic, destructive aspects of human nature, we’d eventually come up with social media.

Social problems arise when initially harmless addictions explode in popularity, and economic problems arise when the long-term costs of the addictions start adding up. Political problems arise when the addictions are so immensely profitable that the companies skimming the profits can buy political influence to protect their toxic products from scrutiny and regulation.

That describes both the tobacco industry before its political protection was stripped away and social media today, as the social media giants hasten to buy political influence to protect their immensely profitable monopolies from scrutiny and regulation.

It’s difficult to measure the full costs of addictions because our system focuses on price discovery at the point of purchase, meaning that absent any regulatory measuring of long-term consequences, the cost of a pack of cigarettes is based not on the long-term costs but solely on the cost of producing and packaging the tobacco into cigarettes, and the enterprise side: marketing, overhead and profit.

(I address the consequences of what we don’t measure in my latest book, Will You Be Richer or Poorer?)

To take tobacco as an example, the full costs of smoking two packs of cigarettes a day for 20 years is not limited to the cost of the cigarettes: 365 days/year X 20 years X 2 packs (14,600) X cost per pack ($5 each) $73,000.

The full costs might total over $1 million in treatments for lung cancer and heart disease, and the reduction in life span and productivity of the smoker. (The emotional losses of those who lose a loved one to a painful early death is difficult to assign an economic value but it is very real.)

If the full costs of the nicotine addiction were included at the point of purchase, each pack of cigarettes would cost about $70 ($1,000,000 / 14,600). Very few people could afford a habit that costs $140 per day ($51,000 per year).

 » Lees verder

Media’s Deafening Silence On Latest WikiLeaks Drops Is Its Own Scandal


28-12-19 10:04:00,

This is getting really, really, really weird.

WikiLeaks has published yet another set of leaked internal documents from within the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) adding even more material to the mountain of evidence that we’ve been lied to about an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria last year which resulted in airstrikes upon that nation from the US, UK and France.

This new WikiLeaks drop includes an email from the OPCW Chief of Cabinet Sebastien Braha (who is reportedly so detested by organisation inspectors that they code named him “Voldemort”) throwing a fit over the Ian Henderson Engineering Assessment which found that the Douma incident was likely a staged event. Braha is seen ordering OPCW staff to “remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever” from the organisation’s secure registry.

Minutes from an OPCW meeting with toxicologists specialized in chemical weapons: “the experts were conclusive in their statements that there was
no correlation between symptoms and chlorine exposure”.

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) December 27, 2019

The drop also includes the minutes from an OPCW toxicology meeting with “three Toxicologists/Clinical pharmacologists, one bioanalytical and toxicological chemist”, all four of whom are specialists in chemical weapons analysis.

“With respect to the consistency of the observed and reported symptoms of the alleged victims with possible exposure to chlorine gas or similar, the experts were conclusive in their statements that there was no correlation between symptoms and chlorine exposure,” the document reads.

According to the leaked minutes from the toxicology meeting, the chief expert offered “the possibility of the event being a propaganda exercise” as one potential explanation for the Douma incident. The other OPCW experts agreed that the key “take-away message” from the meeting was “that the symptoms observed were inconsistent with exposure to chlorine and no other obvious candidate chemical causing the symptoms could be identified”.

Like all the other many, many, many, many different leaks which have been hemorrhaging from the OPCW about the Douma incident, none of the important information contained in these publications was included in any of the OPCW’s public reports on the matter.

 » Lees verder

Social Media and Social Control: How Silicon Valley Serves the US State Department – Activist Post


25-12-19 06:50:00,

By Morgan Artyukhina

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is in the spotlight for “dining with far-right figures,” and their influence over the information that appears in your feed is apparent. However, Facebook isn’t the only Silicon Valley firm that’s masquerading as nonpartisan as it curates the “facts” you see in ads, posts, or searches: Google, Twitter, Microsoft, and others are deeply wedded to the U.S. security state and the billionaires it upholds.

Walter Lippmann’s groundbreaking 1922 study of the news media, “Public Opinion,” begins with a chapter titled, “The World Outside and the Pictures in our Heads,” in which he presents the media as a bottleneck through which information about the world beyond the perception of our senses must pass. Aside from the question of which stories get passed through that bottleneck, which information about an event that survives the crucible of condensation into an article, news bulletin or wire is determined by the biases of the writer and editor. In turn, control over that information bottleneck gives the controller incredible power to shape the consciousness of readers about “the world outside” – the “manufacturing of consent,” as Lippmann originally described it.

The depth of information about the world made available by the internet seems to remove the bottleneck about which Lippmann fretted — indeed, a generation of techie evangelists tried to present it in just such a manner — but the truth is that it only further obscured both the bottlenecks and the crucibles that distill information for our consumption.

The media giants that control our access to information, from search engines like Google to social media like Facebook, have turned themselves into portals to the world and present themselves as impartial in that role. However, behind a facade of separateness, strong connecting links bind the tech giants to the oligarchy and security state on which they rely, giving the interests of the elite determinative influence over which information we access.

This article will expose and discuss some of the many ways this shady web of influence and oversight operates.

The revolving door between these tech companies and intelligence agencies, think tanks, defense contractors and security companies is constantly revolving, especially at the higher echelons of important departments,

 » Lees verder

Me, Myself and Media 54 – FFF: Fit For Front |


23-12-19 05:16:00,

Dieser Artikel ist auch als kostenlose MP3 für Dich verfügbar!

Download MP3

„Der Kopf ist rund, damit das Denken die Richtung wechseln kann!“

Was läuft falsch in der sogenannten Informationsgesellschaft? Immer mehr Menschen haben zu Recht das Gefühl, den immer perverseren Entwicklungen da draußen ohnmächtig ausgesetzt zu sein. Sie fühlen sich wie Opfer, ohne die Täter erkennen zu können. Wie auch? Umstellt von gesichtslosen Bürokratien gibt es nur noch Taten, aber keine Täter. Angebliche „Sachzwänge“ und permanente „Wir-schaffen-das“-Rhetorik haben die demokratische Teilhabe in diesem Land zu einer Farce verkommen lassen.

Parallel dazu hält man uns im Minutentakt mit verzerrten Nachrichten auf dem Laufenden, ohne dass wir als Gesellschaft dabei vorankämen.

Wir werden Zeugen, wie unser Land beginnt, sich zunehmend zu atomisieren. Zudem steht der Frieden auf dem eurasischen Kontinent auf dem Spiel.

Der Brexit ist der Beginn neuer Kriege, die von Wall Street und City of London als politisches Werkzeug der „Teile-und-Herrsche-Politik“ angesehen werden. Speziell Deutschland soll hier zum Aufmarschgebiet gegen den russischen Nachbarn missbraucht werden. Das alles ist kein Zufall, sondern hat Methode. Wenn der längst global agierende Geldadel, eine obszön reiche und verschwindend kleine Minderheit, auf diesem Planeten die Kontrolle über uns behalten will, ist er darauf angewiesen, Eurasien zu kontrollieren. Je mehr Angst wir vor unseren Nachbarn und der Zukunft haben, desto einfacher ist es für die Spitze der Macht-Pyramide uns gegeneinander auszuspielen. Die Schlüsselrolle bei diesem perfiden Treiben spielen „unsere“ Massenmedien. Wem gehören und gehorchen sie wirklich? Welche Interessen verkaufen sie uns? Fakt ist, die sogenannte Freie Presse ist immer, wenn es um das Herbeischreiben neuer Feindbilder geht, eine Massenvernichtungswaffe. Sie vernichtet täglich das, was wir den gesunden Menschenverstand nennen, indem sie uns rund um Uhr mit Nachrichten bombardiert, die vorsätzlich vollkommen aus dem Kontext gerissen wurden. Wir sollen orientierungslos gesendet werden.

Das Ziel der Medienkrise ist aufgegangen, sie hat sich zu einer Gesellschaftskrise entwickelt, bei der sich immer radikalere Gruppen in immer kleineren Meinungsblasen verbarrikadiert haben. Das alles ist Teil von klassischen Kriegsvorbereitungen. Die „Operation Spaltpilz“ läuft und zeigt Wirkung. Wir reden als Bürger nicht mehr mit, sondern nur noch übereinander, und immer größere Teile der Bevölkerung haben aufgehört,

 » Lees verder

Why Western Media Ignore OPCW Scandal


21-12-19 08:27:00,

Via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

The credibility of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is on the line after a series of devastating leaks from whistleblowers has shown that the UN body distorted an alleged CW incident in Syria in 2018. The distortion by the OPCW of the incident suggests that senior directors at the organization were pressured into doing so by Western governments.

This has grave implications because the United States, Britain and France launched over 100 air strikes against Syria following the CW incident near Damascus in April 2018. The Western powers rushed to blame the Syrian government forces, alleging the use of banned weapons against civilians. This was in spite of objections by Russia at the time and in spite of evidence from independent investigators that the CW incident was a provocation staged by anti-government militants.

Subsequent reports by the OPCW later in 2018 and 2019 distort the incident in such a way as to indict the Syrian government and retrospectively exculpate the Western powers over their “retaliatory” strikes.

However, the whistleblower site Wikileaks has released more internal communications provided by 20 OPCW experts who protest that senior officials at the organization’s headquarters in The Hague engaged in “doctoring” their field reports from Syria.

Copies of the doctored OPCW reports are seen to have suppressed important evidence casting doubt on the official Western narrative claiming that the Syrian government was to blame. That indicates the OPCW was engaged in a cover-up to retrospectively “justify” the air strikes by Western powers. This is a colossal scandal which implies the US, Britain and France wrongly attacked Syria and are therefore guilty of aggression. Yet, despite the gravity of the scandal, Western media have, by and large, ignored it. Indicating that these media are subordinated by their governments’ agenda on Syria, rather than exposing the truth as independent journalistic services.

An honorable exception is Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson who has given prominence to the scandal on US national TV. So too has veteran British journalist Peter Hitchens who has helped expose the debacle in the Mail on Sunday newspaper.

Apart from those sources, the mainstream Western media have looked away.

 » Lees verder

Is Western Media Credible Anymore?


13-12-19 08:52:00,

Authored by Prof. Engr. Zamir Ahmed Awan for The Saker Blog,

Western media is spreading fake news and fabricating stories with evil intentions. Western Media is biased and creating unrest and chaos in various parts of the world. Media is being used by the Western world to coerce, influence and achieve their ill-political motives. Unfortunately, Western Media is already dominating and controlling public opinion throughout the world.

Let me give you a particular example of the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). BBC reported that the Saddam Hussain regime in Iraq possesses Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). America along with its allies attacked Iraq, destroyed Iraq, killed millions of people, damaged Infrastructure, Power Houses, Telecommunication, Hospitals, Schools, Churches, Mosques, Roads, Industry, Oil Wells, Refineries, etc. Finally noticed that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Later on, the British Prime Minister of that time, acknowledged that the BBC news was not accurate, and information about WMD was not correct. But after damaging a country totally and harming millions of people, pushing Iraq into stone ages, one’s mere apology may not be accepted and may not be forgiven by humanity, irreversible damage to Iraq may never be forgotten by the history.

It is worth mentioning, Iraq was a very stable, oil-rich, and total welfare state under President Saddam Hussain. Education, health care was free of cost to its citizens, plenty of food, variety of food was available abundantly. Electricity was available in all parts of the country in abundance sufficiently. Fuel and items of daily use were available everywhere conveniently. The society was very much stable, satisfied and living a comfortable life. All factions of the society were enjoying harmony and was a tolerant society. It might be possible a few exceptionally politicians opposing the ruling party “Bath” or President Saddam Hussain, were victimized. They might be few in numbers or two digits only. But the vast majority of the nation was comfortable with the rulers.

But after the US war on Iraq, today, people of Iraq are facing a shortage of food, fuel, electricity, medicines, and items of daily life. No free education and health care are provided by the government. The society is extremely polarized, intolerance and factionist are very much common.

 » Lees verder

De media zijn onafhankelijk – wie gelooft het nog? | Stichting Vaccin Vrij


21-11-19 06:08:00,

Voor de oplettende lezer is het geen nieuws dat de reguliere media een spreekbuis zijn geworden van de belangen van multinationals. Het is zo belangrijk dat we u nadrukkelijk nogmaals willen wijzen op de volgende, trieste realiteit van de reguliere media: Er zijn geen (hoofd)redacties meer. Er is enkel nog de ‘groep’.

Het komt neer op het volgende:

2018: “De Vlaamse uitgevers de Persgroep en het Mediahuis hebben ruim 85 procent van de Nederlandse dagbladen in handen. Deze positie konden ze bereiken door staatssteun van de Belgische overheid. Jaarlijks levert die ze een voordeel van 32 miljoen op.” – Follow the Money1

2017: “Bijna alle betaalde Nederlandse kranten – 80 procent – zijn in handen van twee Belgische bedrijven: Mediahuis en De Persgroep.” – Volkskrant2

Dit houdt in: “dat journalisten niet werken voor titels of individuele producten maar wel voor “de groep”. Die beslist dan waar artikelen en video’s worden gepubliceerd. Een gewaagde strategie die nieuw is voor de sector. Vraag is hoe groot de maakbaarheid van de betrokken journalisten is.”3

Journalisten worden “centraal aangestuurd”. Dit is een gevaarlijke situatie gezien het feit dat de Europese Unie de organisatie is die centraal stuurt – of liever gezegd de duizenden lobbyisten die in Brussel werkzaam zijn. Het Global Vaccin Action Plan (GVAP) staat wat ons betreft gelijk aan een globale overname door de farmaceutische industrie, die neerkomt op een grove mensenrechtenschending. Het GVAP is ontwikkeld onder leiding van onder andere de Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF en de WHO, en haar plannen zijn duidelijk. In de ‘decade of vaccines’ – het tienjarenplan dat is opgezet met als doel om “elk kind ter wereld te vaccineren” – wordt met behulp van miljardeninvesteringen door onder andere Bill Gates strak georganiseerd en zonder pardon over ons uitgerold.

De website van de WHO windt er geen doekjes om

“Partnerorganisaties, overheden en autoriteiten; medici, academici, vaccinproducenten, de media, en particuliere belanghebbenden, zijn een commitment aangegaan om de doelen van het GVAP – het verhogen van de vaccinatiegraad tot 95% door verplicht vaccineren en het monddood maken van elke redelijke weerstand hiertegen – te bewerkstelligen.” 4

Het gaat niet over veiligheid (er is geen bewijs dat vaccineren veilig is),

 » Lees verder

Media Support for the CIA Coup in Bolivia – Global Research


14-11-19 10:56:00,

Without establishment media support, US planned aggression, color revolutions, old-fashioned coups, and other hostile to peace, equity and justice actions wouldn’t get out of the starting gate.

Propaganda support is crucial, manipulating the public mind. Media operate as gatekeepers, proliferating the official narrative, suppressing vital hard truths essential for everyone to know.

Orwell called it “reality control,” substituting managed news misinformation and disinformation for truth-telling.

Discussing the coup in Bolivia, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) said the following:

Bolivian “(a)rmy generals appearing on television to demand the resignation and arrest of an elected civilian head of state seems like a textbook example of a coup,” adding:

“And yet that is certainly not how corporate media are presenting the weekend’s events in Bolivia. No establishment outlet framed the action as a coup,” concealing reality, exclusively reporting state-approved propaganda, saying the following:

NYT: An “infuriated population” was angry about “election fraud” — ignoring Bolivia’s free, fair and open process, Evo Morales elected and reelected four times.

Fox News falsely called his government a “full-blown dictatorship” — ignoring Bolivian democratic rule under his leadership.

When establishment media refer to a “coup,” Morales and his government are falsely accused of the made-in-the-USA plot to topple him.

FAIR: “The New York Times did not hide its approval at events, presenting Morales as a power-hungry despot who had finally ‘lost his grip on power,’ ” adding:

Removing him from office marked “the end of tyranny.”

CNN highlighted the Big Lie of “election fraud,” proving again why it’s the most distrusted name in so-called television news.

Across the board, establishment media suppressed how Morales was “forced (from office) at gunpoint by the military,” FAIR stressed.

CBS News falsely said Morales resigned over “election fraud and protests.”

FAIR: “Delegitimizing foreign elections where the ‘wrong’ person wins, of course, is a favorite pastime of corporate media.”

FAIR: “No mainstream outlet warned its readers (or viewers) that the OAS is a Cold War organization, explicitly set up to halt the spread of leftist governments.”

USAID earlier said the organization “promotes US interests in the Western hemisphere,

 » Lees verder

Media – code rood wat betreft jullie geloofwaardigheid! – Stichting Vaccin Vrij


17-10-19 07:48:00,

boze vrouw met armen over elkaar

Jullie hebben (weer) verzuimd ons te berichten over:

• Het gebrek aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek dat vaccins veilig zijn

• Het gebrek aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek over het gelijktijdig toedienen van meerdere RVP-vaccins

• Het ontbreken van veiligheidsnormen wat betreft de hoeveelheden chemische stoffen die we ‘veilig’ in kunnen spuiten

• Nationale ziekte-, en sterftecijfers die de burger gerust kunnen stellen

• Het EVAP, en alle andere politieke afspraken die achter de rug van de burger om in Brussel worden genomen en onze keuzevrijheid en vrijheid van meningsuiting inperken

• De winsten die gemaakt worden door de farmaceutische industrie

• De rechtszaken die tegen de farmaceutische industrie zijn aangespannen wegens fraude en corruptie

• Voortschrijdend wetenschappelijk onderzoek dat de gevaren van vaccins onderbouwt

Om maar eens wat te noemen…



Jullie hebben je (weer) niet gehouden aan het principe van hoor en wederhoor

• Bezorgde ouders, die om weloverwogen redenen vaccins weigeren worden niet gehoord, of als ‘gekkies’ weggezet

• Ouders met kinderen en volwassenen die vaccinatieschade hebben opgelopen worden jaar in jaar uit genegeerd, buitengesloten en als ‘niet belangrijk’ beschouwd bij de besluitneming. Getuige de Lareb rapportages gaat het om meer dan 100 gevallen per jaar die als ‘ernstig’ worden beschouwd (volgens de internationale criteria die door het Lareb worden gehanteerd). Het betreft slachtoffers die niet serieus worden genomen en, vaak intensieve en langdurige nazorg nodig hebben.



Jullie zijn slechts een spreekbuis voor de gevestigde orde?

• Objectieve informatie heeft plaatsgemaakt voor ongefundeerde meningen

• De berichtgeving dient slechts de belangen van de gevestigde orde

• Objectieve onderzoeksjournalistiek is uitgestorven?



In het nieuws oktober 2019 in de eerste twee weken van oktober:

In een periode waarin dat de politiek bezig is met een beleid dat gebaseerd is op ‘maatregelen’ uit een door lobbyisten beïnvloed Brussel is dit alles waar jullie de burger over kunnen informeren?

15 oktober

Bij ‘rood scenario’ verplicht inenten

Van de Kamer mogen crèches niet-gevaccineerde kinderen straks weigeren

14 oktober

Lokale uitbraak van mazelen op Urk is voorbij

11 oktober

RIVM wil kabinet niet adviseren over verplichte vaccinatie

10 oktober

Lopend Vuur: Je kinderen niet laten vaccineren is asociaal


 » Lees verder

Me, Myself and Media 53 – Toxisches Klima! |


30-09-19 01:35:00,

Dieser Artikel ist auch als kostenlose MP3 für Dich verfügbar!

Download MP3

„Teile und Herrsche“ ist die bewährteste Methode der Eliten, um die eigene Machtbasis stabil zu halten. Solange es den üblichen Verdächtigen gelingt, die Masse dazu zu bringen, sich selber an die Gurgel zu gehen, kann man sich lässig zurücklehnen und die Puppen tanzen lassen. Die meisten von uns sind Puppen – ohne das zu wissen.

Die Fäden, an denen man uns tanzen lässt, sind aus Wut und Verzweiflung gestrickt. Solange uns der Überblick fehlt, erkennen wir nicht das Labyrinth, in dem wir uns auf der Suche nach der echten Freiheit gegenseitig immer wieder begegnen und attackieren. Der dabei aufgestaute Frust braucht ein Ventil, um nicht das ganze Macht-System zu gefährden und so springen wir bereitwillig über jedes Stöckchen, das von den Kontrolleuren der Macht über deren Vasallen hingehalten wird. Die Rede ist von Massenmedien, PR und Werbeagenturen, Think-Tanks, NGO´s und Stiftungen. Alle zusammen sind Teil einer rund um die Uhr arbeitenden Gehirnwaschzentrale, deren primäres Ziel sich nicht ändert.

Es gilt die wahren Schuldigen unsichtbar zu machen und stattdessen immer wieder frische Feindbilder zu kreieren, auf die die Masse dann bereitwillig eindreschen kann. Nach dem bösen Russen, dem undurchsichtige Moslem, dem fiesen Chinesen sind alle jene unter Feuer zu nehmen, die sich nicht für eine global eingeführte CO2-Steuer einsetzen. Der aktuelle Befehl der Massenmedien an uns, das Wahlvolk, lautet jetzt: Klima retten! Konkret: Geh gefälligst auf die Straße und fordere von uns, den Mächtigen, die Einführung einer CO2-Steuer, die vor allem von den unteren Schichten bezahlt werden wird, während die Reichen und Schönen die entstehenden Kosten von der Steuer absetzen werden.

Was mit den eingenommenen Milliarden dann tatsächlich geschieht, lässt sich erahnen. Im Klimaschutz wird das Geld mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht landen. Eher in der Aufrüstung der NATO. Diese Zweckentfremdung wäre nicht neu, sondern wurde nach der Einführung des Solidaritätsbeitrages schon einmal erfolgreich angewendet. Den Bürgern wurde erzählt, die neue Steuer sei für den Aufbau Ost-Deutschlands, doch in Wahrheit flossen die gesammelten Milliarden in den Irak-Krieg. Bekannt?

Klimaschutz ist nötig, nur ist das Klima ja kein Solist, sondern Teil der Umwelt,

 » Lees verder

Mainstream Media Coverage Of Climate Engineering, What Is The Agenda?


21-09-19 09:40:00,

Dane Wigington

Imagine the whole of academia pretending the ongoing geoengineering operations we see in our skies are not really there. Imagine the vast majority of populations blindly accepting the official denial of climate engineering, and thus completely ignoring what they can easily see occurring with their own eyes.

Mainstream media (CNBC) has recently produced a video on the critical issue of climate engineering. Not surprisingly, there are a numerous deceptions woven into the video message, starting with the title itself.

 “Why Bill Gates Is Funding Solar Geoengineering Research”

Bill Gates is nothing more than a prop in the elaborate power structure disinformation campaign on the climate engineering issue. Though Gates may in fact be contributing to the “SCoPEx” climate engineering experiment, the experiment itself is also nothing more than an orchestrated distraction from the ongoing global climate engineering operations that have been deployed for approximately 74 years (over a decade longer than Bill Gates has even been alive).

New released CNBC video on geoengineering:

Inarguable footage of a geoengineering jet aircraft spray dispersion is revealed in the 2 minute video below.

The CNBC video deceptions continue:

#1 The video states that climate engineering “could” cause a long list of downstream consequences.

There is no “could, may, or might”, the consequences of the ongoing global climate engineering assault are far beyond incalculable already, and continue to manifest by the day. Of course, the CNBC video makes no mention of the complete contamination of the biosphere (and thus the air we breath) from the highly toxic climate engineering fallout).

#2 That over two thirds of the population would support the use of goengineering.

Such a conclusion is completely deceptive. Survey questions, which completely omit the most relevant facts regarding the true danger and devastation that climate engineering is already causing, cannot be considered an accurate measure of public opinion. Of over 1500 scientists surveyed, NONE were willing to deny the ongoing climate engineering reality on the record (including Professor Alan Robock who was featured in the new CNBC geoengineering disinformation video).

 » Lees verder

Western Media Portrays Hong Kong Hooligans as Heroes. But Are They? – Global Research


11-09-19 12:46:00,

Whenever Hong Kong protesters are destroying public property, there are no cameras of Western media outlets in sight. But when police decide to intervene, protecting their city, Western media crusaders emerge in full force.

On Sunday, huge US flags were waving in the air. A massive demonstration, consisting of mainly young people, was moving up from the old British-built downtown area of the city towards the US Consulate General, often erroneously called the “embassy.”

The temperature was well over 30 degrees Celsius, but the number of ‘protesters’ kept growing. Many of the main arteries in Hong Kong were entirely blocked.

Western media were there in full force, wearing yellow fluorescent vests, their ‘Press’ insignia, helmets and masks. They mingled with the crowd, filming US flags, clearly enjoying the show.

President Trump, Please Liberate Hong Kong,” I read on several posters.

Liberate from whom?” I asked a cluster of protesters, all of them in ninja outfits, metal bars in their hands, black scarves covering their faces.

Several of them replied, mumbling something incomprehensible. One girl shouted defiantly:

From Beijing!

But Hong Kong is China, isn’t it?” I asked. “How could it be liberated from itself?

No! Hong Kong is Hong Kong!” came a ready-made reply.

Nearby, I spotted British Union Jack, with old colonial-era Hong Kong coat of arms.

The big demonstration was clearly treasonous. Its members delivered a petition to the US consulate general, demanding that the US Congress pass legislation that would require its government to monitor and decide whether Hong Kong is ‘autonomous enough’ from the PRC, and whether it should then qualify for US trade and economic benefits.

All over the downtown area, hundreds of ‘ninjas’ were shouting pro-Western slogans. Here British-era HK flags were being waved, alongside the US flags.

I approached a young couple among the protesters, who were resting on a bench:

Do your friends realize how brutal, undemocratic and oppressive was British rule?

 » Lees verder

Media Dead Silent As Award-Winning Journalist Crumbles The Myths Surrounding Julian Assange


10-09-19 02:56:00,

By Arjun Walia

  • The Facts: Award-winning Australian Mark Davis explains the smear campaign mainstream media is using against Assange. Journalist Greg Bean compares his work to the time that the printing press was invented, putting ‘information’ in the hands of the people.
  • Reflect On: The arrest of Julian Assange and censorship of independent media networks goes to show how information threatens the global elite, and not “national security.” It threatens immoral government and corporate actions/interests.

Mark Davis, a well-known award-winning Australian investigative journalist, best known for his work on Dateline, has said that it’s the journalists from The Guardian and New York Times who should be in jail, not Julian Assange. Obviously, mainstream media has completely ignored this in fear of undermining their smear campaign that’s been running against Julian Assange for years, making him out to be a criminal when in fact he’s the complete opposite.

You can watch Davis’ speech about Assange below.

JFK warned the citizenry about “an announced need for increased security” that would be “seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.” Today, this is known as “national security,” and it’s a term used to justify unethical and enormous amounts of secrecy that do not protect the public, but protect those in power and their corporate, financial and political interests.

These corporate and political interests were exactly what Julian Assange was threatening. As a result, “national security” was used to justify his capture, and the mainstream media machine was used to slander his image and portray him as a criminal.

Mainstream media has a huge influence over the minds of the masses. Although it’s weakening, it’s been used as a massive brainwashing tool since its inception. This is evident by the slew of documents showing the close relationship mainstream media has with government agencies, like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The latest example I wrote about was whistleblower William Arkin. Arkin is a longtime, well-known military and war reporter who is best known for his groundbreaking,

 » Lees verder

‘Nothing!’ Media refuse to cover Roger Waters concert in support of Julian Assange


03-09-19 04:47:00,

If most rockstars performed one of their iconic hits outside the British Home Office, the media would lap it up. Not so, if the star is Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters and he sings for jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Mainstream media completely ignored Waters’ performance outside the British interior ministry office on Monday evening. A search of the ProQuest newspaper database found “nothing” from any UK newspaper on the event, media fairness website Media Lens tweeted.

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters performed ‘Wish You Were Here’ in support of Julian Assange yesterday.

ProQuest newspaper database finds *two* mentions in global media: in Asian News International, New Delhi, and Prensa Latina, Havana.

It finds NOTHING in any UK newspaper!

— Media Lens (@medialens) September 3, 2019

A Google News search finds coverage from the World Socialist Web Site, the Irish Examiner, Ecuador-based Telesur, and some Turkish outlets, as well as RT and Sputnik – but nothing from any major British newspaper or broadcaster.

The event was heavily promoted on Twitter by WikiLeaks and Roger Waters himself – so it appears that the lack of coverage by UK media was a conscious decision rather than an oversight.

Also on
WATCH Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters jam ‘Wish You Were Here’ at Assange demo outside UK Home Office

The silence did not go unnoticed by Assange supporters on social media.

“If Roger Waters were to open his guitar case and sing on any street corner in the world, this would be major cultural news on mainstream media,” one wrote.

Another tweeter cited the lack of coverage in the Guardian as “more evidence that it’s just a propaganda mouthpiece for British Intelligence.”

A search for blueticks on twitter finds no UK journalist commenting on this. But it’s not silence – it’s journalists defending the state, indicating to them “I’m on your side, not Assange’s, I’m reliable”, even as their *own profession* is under major attack. It’s chilling.

— Mark Curtis (@markcurtis30) September 3, 2019

Labour’s Chris Williamson tweeted that he was the “only MP” in attendance at the demonstration,

 » Lees verder

Me, Myself and Media 52 – Hochverrat mit vier Buchstaben |

27-08-19 08:22:00,

Dieser Artikel ist auch als kostenlose MP3 für Dich verfügbar!

Download MP3

Als Willy Brandt sich in den frühen 70er Jahren dafür entschied, eine eigenständige Ost-Politik zu wagen, wurde das in Washington nicht nur mit Argwohn beobachtet. Für das Pentagon galt der deutsche Bundeskanzler Brandt seither als unberechenbar und „Brandt-gefährlich“. Brandt gefährdete mit seiner authentischen Friedens- und Entspannungspolitik das Geschäftsmodell des Militärisch-Industriellen-Komplexes. Brandt suchte und fand den Frieden, der später unter Kohl in der Wiedervereinigung mündete, während sich das Pentagon bis heute vor allem darauf versteht, den Krieg in alle Welt zu tragen.

Derartige „Pannen“ dürfen aus er Sicht der US-Eliten nie wieder passieren und so wird heute jede Form von autarker deutscher Friedenspolitik sabotiert oder im Keim erstickt.

Jüngstes Beispiel ist der Versuch, die Bundesrepublik Deutschland daran zu hindern, zusammen mit Partnern aus der EU den von den USA gebrochenen UN-Atom-Deal mit dem Iran zu retten. Stichwort INSTEX. Diese besonders vom Außenministerium unter Heiko Maas vorangetriebene unabhängige Handelsplattform, deren Ziel es ist, den Handel zwischen EU und Iran trotz der US-Sanktionen weiter zu betreiben, wurde in diesen Tagen massiv beschädigt, als es der BILD-Zeitung gelang, den vom Auswärtigen Amt vorgestellten Präsidenten von INSTEX zu verhindern. Der langjährige Orient-Botschafter der BRD, Bernd Erbel, zog sich, nachdem die BILD ihn als INSTEX-Präsidenten unter Feuer genommen hat, sang und klanglos zurück. Offiziell hieß es dazu auf der Bundespressekonferenz: Die Top-Kraft Erbel hätte aus „privaten Gründen“ diesen überraschenden Rückzieher gemacht.

Glauben wir das?

Wer sich die Mühe macht und die Anti-Erbel-Kampagne der BILD-Zeitung recherchiert, stößt unmittelbar auf die Story hinter der Story. Die Bild-Zeitung als ein Blatt, das sich gerne als Anwalt des kleinen deutschen Arbeiters darstellt, versteht sich, wenn es darauf ankommt, eher als verlängerter Arm des Staates Israel und reagiert, wenn das von ihr verlangt wird. Konkret, die BILD selber wurde erst von der Israel-Lobby auf ein Erbel-Interview bei KenFM aufmerksam gemacht, bei dem der Diplomat a. D. es gewagt hatte, freundlich über die Republik Iran zu sprechen. Da läuteten in Jerusalem die Alarmglocken und man versuchte alles, um Erbel bei INSTEX zu verhindern, mit dem Ziel,

 » Lees verder