Meltdown im Hexenkessel: Wir sind im Krieg

21-07-21 03:54:00, Merkels „hybrider Krieg“ gegen die Selbstbestimmung der Völker ist in die heiße Phase eingetreten.

Wer erinnert sich nicht gerne an eine Zeit, in der sich das Leben unbescholtener und rechtschaffender Bürger in einer sicheren und, zumindest vordergründig, stabilen Gesellschaft, gelebter Kultur und einer scheinbar volksnahen Staatsform abspielte? Auch ich selber war einmal gerne Teil dieser Gesellschaft, selbst wenn man, wegen seltsamer Gewohnheiten seiner Landsleute, im Ausland nicht immer gerne als Deutscher erkannt werden wollte.

Dort meinten viele, die eigene nationale Identität hinter der Sprache Englisch verstecken zu müssen und zu können.

Doch, obwohl man meist rasch als Nachfahre vermeintlich ehrloser und auf Ewigkeit schuldiger Kriegsverlierer enttarnt wurde, hielt sich das Unbehagen Vieler darüber in Grenzen. Es war, zumindest mir, nicht unangenehm, Deutscher mit deutschen Wurzeln zu sein, zumal ich mich persönlich nicht schuldig fühlte und es de jure nicht bin. Auch wenn Ideologen über die Medien und auch meinungsmanipulierte Mitmenschen mir täglich das Gegenteil einzutrichtern versuchten.

Das hat sich in den letzten Jahren geändert. Ich selbst fühle mich diesem irrational hörigen und ignoranten Volk im Geiste nicht mehr zugehörig. Für diese Art der Gesellschaft empfinde ich eine Art mitfühlender Abscheu und spüre tief in mir wachsenden moralischen und seelischen Widerstand. Es keimte in den letzten Jahren immer mehr das Gefühl auf, dass diese selbst- und todessüchtige Gesellschaft (m)einer Aufrichtigkeit und (m)eines guten Willens nicht mehr wert ist.

Während große Teile der Deutschen Bevölkerung, aus ihrem oktroyierten Schuldkult und ohne Hinterfragung von Informationen heraus, meinen, sie alleine könnten, nein, müssten die Welt durch den Krieg gegen CO² retten und als medial sehr reich betitelte Nation alle Verfolgten, Kriminellen und sozial Gestrandeten dieser Welt aufnehmen und lebenslang alimentieren, haben sich Leben und das Gefühl für eine gesellschaftliche Zusammengehörigkeit einer erwachten und kritischen Minderheit in einen gelebten Alptraum verwandelt, der ihr schlicht jegliche Hoffnung auf eine positive Zukunft, die Freude am Leben und jede individuelle Freiheit raubt. Auch die des Wortes und des Geistes.

Die totalitären Repressalien der kommunismusverliebten Angela Merkel und ihrer korrupten und unterwürfigen Vasallen bestimmen immer mehr das Leben und die Zukunft der aufrechten Bewohner dieses Landes, dessen Einwohner schon lange als gutmütig bis naiv beschrieben werden. Auch Napoleon erkannte die humanistische „Macke“ deutscher Landsleute und die veranlasste ihn- sofern dieses Zitat nicht ein weiteres Werkzeug der Kriegsgewinner (und damit der Geschichtsschreiber) zur Verhöhnung der Deutschen sein sollte- zu folgender Äußerung:

Es gibt kein gutmütigeres,

 » Lees verder

Financial Meltdown and the Bailouts: The Role of Speculative Trade. Wall Street Criminality on Display – Global Research

26-08-20 04:54:00,

The Role of Bailouts and Speculative trade

The elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in November 1999 was essential to the process of dramatically cutting back the government’s role as a protector of the public interest on the financial services sector. The Glass-Steagall Act was an essential measure in US President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal.

Some view the New Deal as a strategy for saving capitalism by moderating ts most sharp-edged features. Instituted in 1933 in response to the onset of the Great Depression, the Glass-Steagall Act separated the operations of deposit-accepting banks from the more speculative activity of investment brokers.

The termination of the regulatory framework put in place by the Glass Steagall Act opened much new space for all kinds of experiments in the manipulation of money in financial markets. The changes began with the merger of different sorts of financial institutions including some in the insurance field. Those overseeing the reconstituted entities headquartered on Wall Street took advantage of their widened latitudes of operation. They developed all sorts of ways of elaborating their financial services and presenting them in new packages.

The word, “derivative” is often associated with many applications of the new possibilities in the reconstituted financial services sector. The word, derivative, can be applied to many kinds of transactions involving speculative bets of various sorts. As the word suggests, a derivative is derived from a fixed asset such as currency, bonds, stocks, and commodities. Alterations in the values of fixed assets affect the value of derivatives that often take the form of contracts between two or more parties.

One of the most famous derivatives in the era of the financial crash of 2007-2010 was described as mortgaged-backed securities. On the surface these bundles of debt-burdened properties might seem easy to understand. But that would be a delusion. The value of these products was affected, for instance, by unpredictable shifts in interest rates, liar loans extended to homebuyers who lacked the capacity to make regular mortgage payments, and significant shifts in the value of real estate.

President Bill Clinton Laughs It Up as He Signs the Repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.

 » Lees verder

France’s Meltdown, Macron’s Disdain

03-12-18 11:32:00,

Authored by Guy Milliere via The Gatestone Institute,

On November 11th, French President Emmanuel Macron commemorated the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I by inviting seventy heads of state to organize a costly, useless, grandiloquent “Forum of Peace” that did not lead to anything. He also invited US President Donald Trump, and then chose to insult him. In a pompous speech, Macron — knowing that a few days earlier, Donald Trump had defined himself as a nationalist committed to defending America — invoked “patriotism”; then defined it, strangely, as “the exact opposite of nationalism”; then called it “treason”.

In addition, shortly before the meeting, Macron had not only spoken of the “urgency” of building a European army; he also placed the United States among the “enemies” of Europe. This was not the first time Macron placed Europe above the interests of his own country. It was, however, the first time he had placed the United States on the list of enemies of Europe.

President Trump apparently understood immediately that Macron’s attitude was a way to maintain his delusions of grandeur,as well as to try to derive a domestic political advantage. Trump also apparently understood that he could not just sit there and accept insults. In a series of tweets, Trump reminded the world that France had needed the help of the USA to regain freedom during World Wars, that NATO was still protecting a virtually defenseless Europe and that many European countries were still not paying the amount promised for their own defense. Trump added that Macron had an extremely low approval rating (26%), was facing an extremely high level of unemployment, and was probably trying to divert attention from that.

Trump was right. For months, the popularity of Macron has been in free fall: he is now the most unpopular French President in modern history at this stage of his mandate. The French population has turned away from him in droves.

Unemployment in France is not only at an alarmingly high level (9.1%); it has been been alarmingly high for years.

 » Lees verder

Media meltdown hits stupid levels as Trump and Putin hold first summit (Video)

19-07-18 09:29:00,

US President Donald Trump has just lectured NATO on it member’s commitment performance and held a controversial meeting with the Russian President Vladimir Putin and is next week to receive EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, with trade matters being high up on the agenda.

Juncker is expected to present Trump with a package of proposals to help smooth relations and potentially heal areas of division, particularly those surrounding Europe’s trade relationship with America. Those proposals are precisely what is cropping up as another area of divergence between some members of the EU, specifically France and Germany, just after a major contention on migration has been driving discord within the Union.

This gets down to whether Europe should offer concessions to Trump on trade while Trump is admittedly describing the Union as a ‘foe’ and has initiated a trade spat with the Union by assessing trade tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Europe, spurring retaliatory tariff measures from the EU Commission.

France, specifically, is opposed to any sort of compromise with Trump on the matter, where Trump is perceived as an opponent to the Union and its unity, whereas Germany is economically motivated to seek an end to the trade dispute under the threat of a new round of tariffs emanating from the Trump administration, and is therefore seeking to find some sort of proposal that Trump will accept and therefore back down on his protectionism against the EU, and Germany in particular.

Politico reports:

Only a week before European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker flies to Washington, France and Germany are divided over how much he should offer to U.S. President Donald Trump to end a deepening trade war, say European diplomats and officials.

But, they add, Germany has the upper hand. Berlin is shaping Juncker’s agenda, suggesting three offers that he could take to Trump on July 25 to resolve the dispute, according to people familiar with the plans.

The French are uneasy about the wisdom of such a conciliatory approach, however, and publicly accuse Trump of seeking to splinter and weaken the 28-member bloc, which he has called his “foe.”

Despite Paris’ reservations about giving away too much to the increasingly hostile U.S.

 » Lees verder