National Justice Investigates: American Tax Payers Spend At Least $23 Billion On Israel Every Year

01-01-21 05:02:00,

Last September, Donald Trump accidentally upended an entire generation of myths invented by the left and right that purport to explain America’s costly and unpopular military adventures in the Middle East:

“The fact is, we don’t have to be in the Middle East, other than we want to protect Israel. We’ve been very good to Israel. Other than that, we don’t have to be in the Middle East. You know there was a time we needed desperately oil, we don’t need that anymore.”

As Mondoweiss pointed out at the time, the explosive admission went completely unmentioned in the mainstream media, which traditionally hangs on every one of Trump’s words and reacts hysterically.

Categorizing America’s foreign policy catastrophes as done in the service to Israel has until the Trump era always been dismissed by media tastemakers and political gatekeepers as rank anti-Semitism driven by reductionist, simplistic and conspiratorial thinking, even when intelligence officials like Michael Scheuer and foreign policy experts affirm the view.

Trump’s lack of subtlety when remarking on using American blood and treasure to incrementally advance the interests of the Jewish state is one reason why the Israel lobby, which is perpetually paranoid about the public noticing their activities, is not keen on reciprocating his often suffocating love.

Their paranoia is justified. This year Congress made the mistake of combining its $900 billion dollar coronavirus stimulus bill, which suffering people are closely followed the development of, with the yearly $1.4 trillion dollar fiscal budget, which is typically ignores.

A deluge of popular anger was provoked by news that we would only be receiving a $600 dollar check under the guise of budget austerity. At the same time, buried deep in the 5,600 monstrosity was a provision setting aside supposed budget constraints to give Israel the equivalent of $5,000 dollars for each of their citizens.

Jews in the media responded to the controversy by calling indignant American tax payers, including actress Alyssa Milano and various left-wing journalists, “fools” and “anti-Semites.” They doubled down by stating that the $500 million dollars provided to Israel was a drop in a $2.3 trillion dollar bucket. They pointed out that other countries, such as Jordan, were receiving foreign aid as well.

 » Lees verder

National Rifle Association of America: Selber ins Knie geschossen

25-08-20 02:43:00,

NRA of America: Selber ins Knie geschossen

US-Waffen-Lobbyisten stolpern über ihre eigene Selbstüberschätzung

Sie stehen kurz vor der Auflösung.

von Monique Ryser für die Online-Zeitung INFOsperber.

Die National Rifle Association (NRA) ist eine der mächtigsten Lobbyorganisationen in den USA. Zwar geben Big Tobacco oder die Pharmabranche mehr Geld für die Beeinflussung von Politikern aus, aber die Waffenfreunde haben den einmaligen Vorteil, dass Millionen von Menschen ihre Anliegen tagtäglich verteidigen. So wurden im ersten Halbjahr 2020 in den USA bereits über 12 Millionen Waffen verkauft.


Das ist nur eine Million weniger als der gesamte Verkauf von 2019. Corona, die Proteste gegen Rassismus, Nationalgarden in Grossstädten, ein Präsident mit martialischer Sprache und Politik befeuern offenbar den Wunsch, sich mit seiner eigenen Waffe zu schützen.

Der 2. Zusatzartikel zur US-Verfassung postuliert das Recht, eine Waffe zu besitzen und sein Eigentum notfalls mit Waffengewalt zu verteidigen. Er stammt aus dem Jahr 1791. Aber sämtliche Bemühungen, das Prinzip auf eine Grundlage zu stellen, die der Neuzeit entspricht, sind bisher gescheitert. Auch dank der NRA: Denn jedes Mal, wenn nach einem Massaker oder neuen Höchstzahlen von Schusswaffentoten nach einer strengeren Regulierung des Waffenbesitzes gerufen wird, tritt sie auf den Plan. Bei den Wahlen im Jahr 2016 gingen allein 50 Millionen Franken [ca. 46,5 Mio. €; H.S.] an die Trump-Kampagne und an der NRA-genehme Senatoren der Republikaner. Die Wahl von Donald Trump war ein Freudenfest für die Organisation, sie rief den Moment als historisch aus und wollte ein für allemal die Waffengegner ausschalten.


► Versicherung ohne Lizenz verkauft

Heute, nicht mal vier Jahre danach, steht der mächtige Verein kurz vor der Auflösung. Für die Wahlen im Herbst hat die NRA erst 250’000 Dollar eingesetzt, mehr Geld ist nicht mehr da, wie das Magazin New Republic schreibt (Artikel unter Abo).

Waffenbesitz-Rifle-Schusswaffe-Waffenbesitzrecht-Waffengegner-Waffengewalt-Schusswaffengewalt-Schusswaffentote-Waffenverbot-Waffenwahn-NRA-Kritisches-NetzwerkDer tiefe Fall ist selbstverschuldet, denn die Verantwortlichen schienen trunken von der Macht und glaubten sich unangreifbar. Nun sind es aber zwei eher unbekannte Aufsichtsbehörden in New York, die der mächtigen Organisation das Fürchten lehren. Da ist einmal die Versicherungsaufsicht: Die NRA verkaufte unter ihrem Dach die Versicherung Carry Guard.

 » Lees verder

What is the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED)? – Activist Post

17-08-20 08:02:00,

By Tony Cartalucci

When US-backed regime change begins in a targeted nation, many – particularly those supporting protests – will deny the US is involved.

When US involvement is no longer deniable – many will finally admit it – but backpedal and claim there is nothing wrong with the US supporting “freedom” and “democracy” abroad.

With virtually every aspect of ongoing protests in Thailand funded by the US – from the leaders like Anon Nampa of the US government-funded “Thai Lawyers for Human Rights,” to fronts like US government-funded iLaw petitioning to rewrite the Thai constitution, to media fronts like US government-funded Prachatai attempting to control the narrative regarding the protests – this process of denial and backpedaling has already begun.

The protests in Thailand are mainly funded through the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED) with all of this funding appearing on the US NED’s official website as well as in admissions from these groups themselves during previous interviews, and occasionally featured on their own websites when and if they make financial disclosures.

The NED and the fronts they are funding all claim to be promoting democracy. Others attempting to expose this funding claim it represents political interference and is a bad thing.

But what is the NED and how could the US promoting democracy be a bad thing?

It is Bad – Because the US NED Isn’t Really Promoting Democracy

The US has openly invaded nations, murdered sitting governments, killed hundreds of thousands of people in the process, before hand-picking favorable client regimes. The US NED is simply a subtler way of achieving regime change – but often also helps pave the way for destabilization leading to direct US military intervention as was the case during the 2011 “Arab Spring.”

In fact, many of the people sitting on the US NED board of directors have signed their names to documents, op-eds, and essays calling for the invasion and regime change by force of other nations including Afghanistan in 2001, Iraq in 2003, Libya and Syria in 2011, and Ukraine in 2013-2014.

Some of them even participated directly.

 » Lees verder

National Security Alert: COVID Tests Scientifically Fraudulent, Epidemic of False Positives – Global Research

05-08-20 03:29:00,

Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) tests are used worldwide to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection. An in-depth investigation reveals clear scientific evidence proving that these tests are not accurate and create a statistically significant percentage of false positives. Positive results more likely indicate “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”

In fact, American biochemist Kary Mullis, now deceased, who won the Noble Prize in chemistry for creating PCR technology, repeatedly stated throughout his career that it should not be used to test for viruses. This technology is designed to replicate DNA sequences, not test for coronavirus infections.

Executive Action Required

President Trump must take immediate action to investigate and hold members of the FDA, CDC and WHO accountable for scientific fraud and Crimes Against the Humanity.

If he does not take immediate action, he is thereby complicit in what clearly amounts to Crimes Against Humanity, as this report will detail.

Multiple U.S. Intelligence Community contacts have verified the accuracy of the extensive investigative report, conducted by award-winning journalist Torsten Engelbrecht, featured below. While they do take issue with some of the reports verbiage, they corroborate the main findings: PCR tests should not be relied upon for accurate results and create a significant percentage of false positives.

We also feature a New York Times report from 2007, entitled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,” which also clearly reveals how scientifically inaccurate PCR tests are, featuring many shocking statements from medical experts on the use of these tests, clearly laying out how they result in false positives and lead to dangerous exaggerations and false alarms.

Note: We are NOT reporting that the coronavirus is a complete hoax. You should take precautions and consult your doctor for best safety practices.

We are reporting, as the evidence reveals, that the number of COVID-positive results and the number of COVID-related deaths have been significantly exaggerated.

Based on our findings, the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration should not be trusted or relied upon for accurate information, and needs to be immediately investigated and held accountable for Crimes Against Humanity.

 » Lees verder

The National Institute of Health (NIH) Owns Half of Moderna Vaccine: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Global Research

09-07-20 03:40:00,

New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health (NIH) owns half the key patent for Moderna’s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties.

In addition, four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors. Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked.

These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption.

NIH’s stake in the jab may explain why Anthony Fauci moved Moderna’s vaccine to the front of the line and to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines.

Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID’s unique penchant for “pathogenic priming.” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus.

Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci’s decision to skip animal trials as reckless. It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency, BARDA, despite the fact that Moderna has never brought a product to market or gotten approval.

Fauci publicly announced he was ‘encouraged’ by Moderna’s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 ‘severe or medically significant’ reactions following vaccination.

Fauci’s infusion made Moderna CEO Steve Bancel a billionaire and further enriched Fauci’s mentor and co-investor Bill Gates.

It may also explain why Fauci publicly announced he was “encouraged” by Moderna’s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that 20% of the high dose and 6% of the low dose groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 “severe or medically significant” reactions following vaccination.

Those results would have spelled DOA for any other medical product. After getting the abysmal news, Bancel and four other Moderna executives immediately dumped more than $89 million in stock and Fauci was forced to make his optimistic public assessment to save Moderna’s plummeting shares from death spiral.

 » Lees verder