George Orwells 1984 opnieuw uitgebracht – De Lange Mars plus


12-07-20 09:39:00,

Niet eerder sinds 1948 (toen het boek werd geschreven)  is het boek van Orwell zo actueel als nu. Het totalitaire systeem wat George Orwell beschrijft in dit boek geeft exact de sfeer de weer van de huidige samenleving. Ook hier een Ministerie van Waarheid (Ministerie van Volksgezondheid) dat met waanzinnige bepalingen die kant noch wal raken de bevolking dicteert en overheerst. En niet te vergeten Big Brother die onder het mom van veiligheid iedereen volgt en zijn of haar doen en laten opneemt en vastlegt. Kijk naar deze samenleving in het fictieve jaar 1984 en ontdek de verbazingwekkende overeenkomsten.

Oorlog is vrede

Orwells uitspraken zijn meer dan een halve eeuw oud, maar bieden nog steeds een diep begrip van zijn toekomst en onze hedendaagse werkelijkheid. Hij analyseert ook de onbewuste en de bewuste mens, en relativeert de laatste groep.

Enkele veelzeggende citaten uit zijn boek ‘1984’.

“Oorlog is vrede. Vrijheid is slavernij. Onwetendheid is kracht”.

Orwells maatschappij wordt geregeerd door leugens en geweld. Leugens die eindeloos werden herhaald totdat iedereen ze gelooft. Rutte heeft veel van dit boek geleerd. Vertaald naar onze tijd: Privacyschending is veiligheid. Oorlog met Rusland betekent vrede.

“Voor zij bewust worden, zullen zij nooit in opstand komen en pas nadat zij in opstand zijn gekomen, kunnen zij bewust worden.”

Dit schrijft de hoofdpersoon over de proles (die 85% van de bevolking uit maken):”…Zwaar lichamelijk werk, de zorg voor vrouw en kinderen, kleinzielige ruzies met buren, films, voetbal, bier en bovenal gokken maakten heel de horizon van hun geesten uit. Het was niet moeilijk hen in toom te houden.”

Voeg daar het creëren van armoede aan toe en alle instrumenten om mensen gedwee in de pas te laten meelopen is compleet.


“De proles, die gewoonlijk apathisch stonden tegenover de oorlog, werden opgezweept tot een van hun periodieke aanvallen van verwoede vaderlandsliefde. Als om in overeenstemming te blijven met de algemene stemming, hadden de raketbommen groter aantal mensen gedood….een viel op een volle bioscoop…begroef verscheidene honderden slachtoffers onder het puin.”

Dit zweepte de haat op. Dit is vergelijkbaar met het effect van terreuraanslagen,

 » Lees verder

Is Orwell’s Ministry Of Truth Alive? Why Don’t We Hear Much About Julian Assange?


11-09-19 08:08:00,

Authored by Michelle Wood via,

In Orwell’s dystopian fiction 1984, the government’s mission through the Ministry of Truth is to supply its people with news, entertainment, books, films, plays and songs, packed with the information it wants the people to know. It constructs lies to fit the narrative it wishes to establish and sets about rewriting historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line.

Have we slept walked our way into 1984 with the curious witchhunt of Julian Assange?

From the time Wikileaks published Collateral Murder in 2010, exposing the slaying of Iraqi civilians at the hands of merciless US Apache soldiers, in what became the biggest news story of its time, the United States has wanted Julian Assange silenced and forgotten.

He has lived in a state of confinement since May 2010 when he was arrested and jailed in the United Kingdom, lived under house arrest for a further 18 months in England and then sought political asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy from June 2012 .Yet many people think Assange was in a position where he could simply walk free.

Has there been a well crafted smear campaign to dehumanise Assange and coax the public into forgetting him? How else could he have been detained within two tiny rooms devoid of sunlight for more than six years without public commentary and concern? The apparent dismantling of Assange’s character and disinformation has been thorough. Most people do not know the specifics of his case, but “believe” he is an arrogant rapist and an ungrateful, badly behaved houseguest, smearing faeces on the embassy walls and being cruel to his cat. These disputed claims are now so well accepted it’s inconceivable that they could actually be lies.

The one surety about Assange was that he did publish secret State documents and videos. Embarrassing yes, but surely not indictable in a country that protects freedom of speech in its constitution. Never mind the fact that Assange is an Australian citizen, but far from protecting him against being tried for espionage in America, the Morrison government’s public statements have been limited to assurances that he is being treated like any other citizen with ongoing consular assistance.

 » Lees verder

Orwell’s 1984 No Longer Reads Like Fiction: It’s The Reality Of Our Times


01-07-19 07:51:00,

Authored by Robert Bridge, op-ed via,

70 years ago, the British writer George Orwell captured the essence of technology in its ability to shape our destinies in his seminal work, 1984. The tragedy of our times is that we have failed to heed his warning.

No matter how many times I read 1984, the feeling of total helplessness and despair that weaves itself throughout Orwell’s masterpiece never fails to take me by surprise. Although usually referred to as a ‘dystopian futuristic novel’, it is actually a horror story on a scale far greater than anything that has emerged from the minds of prolific writers like Stephen King or Dean Koontz. The reason is simple. The nightmare world that the protagonist Winston Smith inhabits, a place called Oceania, is all too easily imaginable. Man, as opposed to some imaginary clown or demon, is the evil monster. 

In the very first pages of the book, Orwell demonstrates an uncanny ability to foresee future trends in technology. Describing the protagonist Winston Smith’s frugal London flat, he mentions an instrument called a ‘telescreen’, which sounds strikingly similar to the handheld ‘smartphone’ that is enthusiastically used by billions of people around the world today.

“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes four. If that is granted, all else follows” #orwell #1984

— Dennis Junk (@DJunkInTheTrunk) June 26, 2019

Orwell describes the ubiquitous device as an “oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror” affixed to the wall that “could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely.” Sound familiar? It is through this gadget that the rulers of Oceania are able to monitor the actions of its citizens every minute of every day. At the same time, the denizens of 1984 were never allowed to forget they were living in a totalitarian surveillance state, under the control of the much-feared Thought Police. Massive posters with the slogan ‘Big Brother is Watching You’ were as prevalent as our modern-day advertising billboards. Today, however, such polite warnings about surveillance would seem redundant, as reports of unauthorized spying still gets the occasional lazy nod in the media now and then.

 » Lees verder

George Orwell’s Dystopian Nightmare In China


26-06-19 09:04:00,

Authored by Kelley Beuacar Vlahos via The American Conservative,

Beijing’s tyranny over its people is fast becoming more terrifying than anything in Nineteen Eighty-Four…

It has become fairly cliché to call China’s surveillance state – its artificial intelligence-driven facial recognition, the new “social credit system,” its cultural policing and re-education camps for Uyghur minorities – “something right out of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

But that doesn’t mean it’s not true.

Orwell’s dystopian vision, first published 70 years ago this June, was informed by the fascist and communist movements that triggered worldwide military conflict and the deaths of millions of people during the mid-20th century. But Orwell’s warning went well beyond the wars we knew. It cautioned, noted Erich Fromm in an afterword in the 1961 edition, against the loss of humanity and free thought, and the new, increasingly centralized “managerial industrialism, in which man builds machines which act like men and develops men who act like machines.” It showed how that could be used as a tool of totalitarian ambitions.

China convulsed in revolution during the 1940s; Mao Zedong established the one-party state of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949. But Orwell, according to Fromm, had his gaze on Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union when he wrote Nineteen Eighty-Four, which is set in fictional Oceania, one of three of the world’s superstates. Oceania is run by one party, Ingsoc (English Socialism), headquartered in what is left of post-war London. “Big Brother” is the god-like, mustachioed visage serving as the party’s fearsome symbol of absolute authority.

As rooted as Nineteen Eighty-Four is in Orwell’s own uncertain world, he could not have imagined how his predictions for humankind would morph and metastasize beyond the terrors of Mao’s Cultural Revolution and into the cyber-authoritarianism we are seeing in Xi Jinping’s China today (still run by the Chinese Communist Party).

Where the Soviet experiment failed, China’s has evolved more powerfully into a hybrid of state-run capitalism. Control is maintained through coercion and social management. There is no rule of law as it is universally understood, and electionsare compulsory,

 » Lees verder