SCIENCE IN DENIAL: Questioning so-called “normal” levels for deadly substances like formaldehyde, mercury and glyphosate

science-in-denial:-questioning-so-called-“normal”-levels-for-deadly-substances-like-formaldehyde,-mercury-and-glyphosate

26-07-19 12:00:00,

Image: SCIENCE IN DENIAL: Questioning so-called “normal” levels for deadly substances like formaldehyde, mercury and glyphosate

(Natural News) It’s not difficult to find medical management guidelines for the world’s most deadly chemicals and heavy metal toxins that somehow find their way into human bodies regularly, especially in America. The EPA, FDA and CDC all establish “legal” and “normal” levels for neurotoxins in human blood, periodically and conveniently raising those amounts after lawsuits and deaths arise by the numbers.

As corporations further pollute our agriculture, our food, our medicine, house and lawn care concoctions, and even our personal care products, the regulatory agencies and medical doctors tell us we’ve got nothing to worry about. They lie.

In fact, NO AMOUNT of formaldehyde, mercury, or glyphosate is “normal” or safe for human consumption; moreover, all three substances are exceptionally dangerous, especially when injected into pregnant women, infants and children. What’s the normal level for rattlesnake venom or uranium in human blood? In other words, there are NO “normal” levels, it’s all a con.

Formaldehyde is a highly toxic, explosive gas that can kill an adult who ingests just one ounce, so imagine the effect on babies

Ingestion of formaldehyde causes corrosive injury to your insides, resulting in nausea, vomiting, pain, bleeding and perforation. Long term cumulative effects of ingestion, inhalation and injection of formaldehyde include CNS depression, metabolic acidosis, respiratory distress, renal failure, coma and death.

Formaldehyde is so dangerous to living beings that even very low-dose acute exposure results in headaches and dyspnea (shortness of breath or labored breathing). Add a little more embalming fluid, say to a few vaccines, the carpet in your home, some foam insulation, petroleum-based personal care products, and your new clothes, and then you’ve got a higher cumulative dose working its voodoo magic on your lungs, leading to bronchitis, pulmonary edema (fluid accumulation in the lungs) and then deadly pneumonia.

ebook
Discover how to prevent and reverse heart disease (and other cardio related events) with this free ebook: Written by popular Natural News writer Vicki Batt, this book includes everything you need to know about preventing heart disease, reversing hypertension, and nurturing your cardiac health without medication. Learn More.

Medical doctors are strictly instructed to NEVER blame vaccines for any health complications children face,

 » Lees verder

5G’s “Day Of Crisis Science” Recognition – Saturday, July 27, 2019

5g’s-“day-of-crisis-science”-recognition-–-saturday,-july-27,-2019

15-07-19 07:46:00,

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Together, we’re calling on wireless companies (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile) and their sub-contractors (Crown Castle, ExteNet Systems and other antenna installers) to suspend the deployment of small cell wireless antennas near places where people live, work and play until such time as chronic, low level exposure to radio-frequency (RF) microwave radiation can be proven safe for everyone.

Source: 5G Crisis
https://www.5gcrisis.com/find-a-group

According to an email I received from 5G ! Crisis, a project of Americans for Responsible Technology,

On Saturday, July 27th, [2019] parents, grandparents, cancer survivors, victims of EHS, medical professionals and scientists from across the country will come together to express their science-based health objections to the rollout of 5G.

Rallies will be held outside of wireless carrier stores to attract media attention and put pressure on big telecom companies to stop 5G deployment until such time as the technology can be made safe for everyone. Is that really such an unreasonable demand? 

Since vested microwave interests are moving forward, like greased lightning, to install 5G, which scientifically never has been proven safe for all living entities, and is classified as a “military grade weapon,”  it truly is incumbent upon all who either are electromagnetically hypersensitive (EHS) or just plain concerned and scared about what will happen to human physiology when we are saturated by 5G cells microwave radiation only feet away from our homes, places of employment, Wi-Fi in our offices, or ‘raining’ down from thousands of satellites perched above Earth.

Will 5G have the capability to ‘weaponize’ nanoparticulates being released from planes spraying to provide weather geoengineering known as Solar Radiation Management (SRM)?

Will or can 5G ‘aggravate or morph microscopic organisms into biological entities science cannot deal with?

How will 5G affect geoengineered particulates already in human brains and lungs, thanks to what’s being sprayed above our heads for man-made weather management, including our being a human experiment of gargantuan proportions, without our consent, thereby violating the Nuremberg Code?

 » Lees verder

Science Can Explain the Globalist Mentality – It’s a Kind of Criminal Psychological Disorder

science-can-explain-the-globalist-mentality-8211-its-a-kind-of-criminal-psychological-disorder

24-03-19 09:52:00,

In my work analyzing the behavior and motives of globalists I often hear people question the validity of the label. Sometimes this is done by those who are purely uneducated about the background of what I can only call an organized cabal or criminal syndicate. Sometimes it is done by dishonest people who are seeking to sow the seeds of doubt. To be clear, yes, globalists are a very real group with a very real agenda, and this agenda is not morally or rationally sound.

The argument then arises – “If globalists are a real threat, then we should identify them one by one…”

This argument is often a ruse which insinuates that if a person points out the facts surrounding a crime on the part of globalists, his position is still not valid until he names them all in succession. This is a classic Alinsky tactic; to demand that the researcher catalog every person involved in a conspiracy or present a perfect solution to the criminality which may or may not be available, otherwise they should shut up and stop talking about the problem. The intent is to get us caught up in the weeds debating the extent of who is involved or whether one solution is superior to another.

Acknowledging that a specific agenda exists is the first step before anything else can be accomplished.

Obviously, one cannot outline a long list of globalist names in every essay or article. This would make each article dozens of pages long and is counterproductive. Naming names might be helpful in some circumstances, as I have done in the past such as in my article ‘Globalist Disinformation Spotlight On – Mohamed El-Erian’. I welcome readers to examine that article because El-Erian is a good example of what a globalist is and the kind of ideology they espouse. It is my feeling though that it is more important to focus on the behaviors, rhetoric, institutional affiliations and beliefs of globalists, because these elitists often hide in plain sight.

Not all of them publicly call themselves “globalists”; some of them do. However, they ALL have the same character traits and they all support the same agendas.

First and foremost I suppose I should address the so called “elephant in the room”;

 » Lees verder

The Crisis of Science : The Corbett Report

the-crisis-of-science-the-corbett-report

24-02-19 09:56:00,

Corbett

02/24/2019

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Watch this video on BitChute / DTube / YouTube

In recent years, the public has gradually discovered that there is a crisis in science. But what is the problem? And how bad is it, really? Today on The Corbett Report we shine a spotlight on the series of interrelated crises that are exposing the way institutional science is practiced today, and what it means for an increasingly science-dependent society.

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with: science

 » Lees verder

The Science Behind The Medical Cannabis Industry

the-science-behind-the-medical-cannabis-industry

22-02-19 09:34:00,

Submitted by Visual Capitalist

There’s nothing quite like cannabis in the plant kingdom. Beneath its humble surface, over 750 unique compounds exist within – all of which have helped propel the cannabis industry into the multi-billion dollar market it is today.

Today’s infographic from The Green Organic Dutchman takes a deep dive into the cannabis components which contribute to its therapeutic potential, how it interacts with the human body, and the ways it can be consumed.

The Chemical Effects of Cannabis

While many people would be familiar with THC and CBD as the two major cannabinoids, there are a few lesser-known cannabinoids which also play important roles: Cannabichromene (CBC), Cannabigerol (CBG), Cannabinol (CBN), Tetrahydrocannbivarin (THCv), and Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCa).

In different combinations, they work together with terpenes – aromatic oils that are present in most plants – to provide relief for a variety of ailments.

When cannabinoids and terpenes interact, the human endocannabinoid system is already equipped to deal with the entourage effects that are created.

Modern-Day Medical Cannabis

It’s clear that many cultures embraced cannabis long before scientific research came into play. Its therapeutic properties were widely recorded and extolled around the world.

After decades of restricted access and stigma, the tide is turning back towards what our ancestors discovered long ago. Millions of patients rely on medical cannabis today, with Canada and Israel paving the way in cannabis research.

  • Canada

    Medical cannabis has been legal nationwide since 2001, aiding scientists in studying its effects.

    Funding: CAD$1.4 million (US$1.05 million) invested by the government towards research projects.

  • Israel

    Since the 1990s, medical cannabis has been legal for patients of cancer, chronic pain, and PTSD.

    Funding: 8 million shekels (US$2.16 million) annual government funding to support innovation.

Back in the day, typically only dried cannabis flower was used. However, consumption methods have evolved into three broad categories today: ingestion, inhalation, and application.

  • Ingesting

    The dosage of cannabis consumed is easy to control using edibles or beverages,

 » Lees verder

How the Corruption of Science Contributes to the Collapse of Modern Civilization – Global Research

how-the-corruption-of-science-contributes-to-the-collapse-of-modern-civilization-8211-global-research

23-01-19 11:27:00,

Publication Prejudice, Fraud and Deceptive Favoritism

During the past decade, scientific prejudice, bias and outright deceit has been endemic to peer-reviewed scientific literature, especially in the medical and psychiatric fields. Medical journals have been thoroughly hijacked by the pharmaceutical industry as have departments at universities and research institutions that are principally funded by private interests. It is no longer a secret that industry-funded studies inordinately convey positive results. Positive research is published; negative research is suppressed and buried. Consequently the reality of robust and honest medical research is skewed and distorted. Physicians and medical clinics thereby only get a small peek into the actual safety, efficacy and contraindications of the drugs later peddled to them by pharmaceutical sales reps. 

In 2009, Harvard’s Dr. Marcia Angell, a former editor for the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine wrote,

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.”[1]

Later, the editor of The Lancet, Dr. Richard Horton stated,

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”

A large percentage of published studies and trials have either not been reproduced or failed to be reproduced. For example, in 2012, a scientist and his team at Amgen attempted to reproduce 53 published cancer studies and only succeeded in reproducing six. In another project published in Nature, only 39 of 100 psychology studies could be replicated.[2] Although Horton is optimistic that the proverbial cat is out of the bag and the medical community has been given warning, he despairs that “the bad news is that nobody is ready to take the first step to clean up the system.”[3]

Doctors at Children’s Hospital Boston undertook the task of reviewing 546 drug trials listed in the government’s Clinical Trials database. They found that industry funded trials showing a positive results were 70 percent more likely to be published than research funded by federal health agencies.[4] 

In 2010,

 » Lees verder

Science Confirms Turmeric is as Effective as 14 Drugs | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda

science-confirms-turmeric-is-as-effective-as-14-drugs-light-on-conspiracies-8211-revealing-the-agenda

01-01-19 07:55:00,

Sayer Ji, Green Med Info
Waking Times

Turmeric is one the most thoroughly researched plants in existence today.  Its medicinal properties and components (primarily curcumin) have been the subject of over 5600 peer-reviewed and published biomedical studies.  In fact, our five-year long research project on this sacred plant has revealed over 600 potential preventive and therapeutic applications, as well as 175 distinct beneficial physiological effects. This entire database of 1,585 ncbi-hyperlinked turmeric abstracts can be downloaded as a PDF at our Downloadable Turmeric Document page, and acquired either as a retail item or with 200 GMI-tokens, for those of you who are already are members and receive them automatically each month.

Given the sheer density of research performed on this remarkable spice, it is no wonder that a growing number of studies have concluded that it compares favorably to a variety of conventional medications, including:

  • Lipitor/Atorvastatin(cholesterol medication): A 2008 study published in the journalDrugs in R & D found that a standardized preparation of curcuminoids from Turmeric compared favorably to the drug atorvastatin (trade name Lipitor) on endothelial dysfunction, the underlying pathology of the blood vessels that drives atherosclerosis, in association with reductions in inflammation and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients. [i]  [For addition curcumin and ‘high cholesterol’ research – 8 abstracts]
  • Corticosteroids (steroid medications): A 1999 study published in the journal Phytotherapy Research found that the primary polyphenol in turmeric, the saffron colored pigment known as curcumin, compared favorably to steroids in the management of chronic anterior uveitis, an inflammatory eye disease.[ii]  A 2008 study published in Critical Care Medicine found that curcumin compared favorably to the corticosteroid drug dexamethasone in the animal model as an alternative therapy for protecting lung transplantation-associated injury by down-regulating inflammatory genes.[iii] An earlier 2003 study published in Cancer Letters found the same drug also compared favorably to dexamethasone in a lung ischaemia-repurfusion injury model.[iv]  [for additional curcumin and inflammation research – 52 abstracts]
  • Prozac/Fluoxetine & Imipramine  (antidepressants): A 2011 study published in the journal Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica found that curcumin compared favorably to both drugs in reducing depressive behavior in an animal model.

 » Lees verder

https://lyfebotanicals.com/health/turmeric-benefits/ 

Show us the science and give us the choice! – twee Amerikaanse collega’s schetsen een beeld van wat ons te wachten staat? – Stichting Vaccin Vrij

Show us the science and give us the choice! – twee Amerikaanse collega’s schetsen een beeld van wat ons te wachten staat? – Stichting Vaccin Vrij

16-08-18 07:47:00,

Openbaar, gemakkelijk toegankelijke wetenschap en keuzevrijheid – het zijn logische eisen van verantwoordelijk ouders. Voordat zij ‘iets’ laten inspuiten bij hun kinderen willen ze weten hoe, en door wie onderzocht is of het veilig is. En ze willen ook zelf kunnen bepalen of ze hun baby’s wel of niet laten vaccineren! Als we iets kunnen leren van hoe raar het kan lopen in een democratie, is dat wel van de Amerikanen. De Verenigde Naties lijken wat betreft vaccineren meer op een fascistische dan democratische staatsvorm.

De hetze tegen ouders die niet vaccineren, de toegenomen druk, en de eenzijdige en manipulatieve berichtgeving in de media in Europa zijn allemaal zaken waar de Amerikanen al jaren mee kampen. En nu er een globale bewustwording gaande is, lijkt het of de gevestigde orde alles uit de kast haalt om de mensen nog wat langer in haar greep te houden. Op dit moment is de situatie in USA qua vrijheidsbeperking erger dan bij ons. En daarom ook zo leerzaam. Is dit ons voorland? Of telt een gewaarschuwd mens voor twee?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barbara Lou Fisher is de mede-oprichtster van National Vaccine Information Centre (NVIC). Ze schreef verschillende boeken, waaronder ‘A shot in the dark’ over de – nog immer voortdurende – gebrekkige werking en risico’s van het kinkhoestvaccin. Ze was tientallen keren te zien op nationale televisie in Amerika en verscheen in The Greater Good, Shots in the DarkVaccines RevealedThe Truth About Vaccines en andere documentaires.
Websites:  www.NVIC.org, www.NVICAdvocacy.org en www.TheVaccineReaction.org

Joseph Mercola is arts en initiatiefnemer van een van de grootste natuurlijke gezondheid-bewegingen in USA. Zijn slogan: Neem de controle over uw gezondheid in eigen hand. Hij informeert de burger over schaduwkanten van pillen en vaccins, en natuurlijke manieren om gezond te blijven. Zijn nieuwsbrief heeft meer dan 1.5 miljoen abonnees.
Websites: www.mercola.org en www.mercola.com

 

 

 

 

 

Over de auteur: Door Frankema is moeder van twee ongevaccineerde, inmiddels volwassen kinderen. Zij is schrijfster van het boek: ‘Vaccinvrij – ouders,

 » Lees verder