Science For Madmen & ‘The Great Reset’


18-10-20 09:43:00,

Authored by MN Gordon via,

One of the absurdities of the coronavirus era is the purported faith in science by the political class; in particular, the left.

Joe Biden, for instance, said he would shut the country down if recommended by scientists.  Nancy Pelosi, this week, with respect to coronavirus stimulus, told Wolf Blitzer, that “…the science should call the shot and when they do, we should all trust it.”

“Trust, but verify,” counseled Ronald Reagan.  No doubt, the Gipper, didn’t envision the ridiculous science behind coronavirus containment policy.

President Trump, taking the advice of Reagan, recently verified the effects of coronavirus himself.  His findings, following a three day bout with the illness, revealed the science based policies that have been applied are not to be trusted.  Trump tweeted these conclusions:

“One thing that’s for certain: Don’t let it dominate you.  Don’t be afraid of it.  You’re going to beat it.”

According to Science magazine,

 “[Trump’s] repeated public dismissals of scientific expertise, and his disdain for evidence have prompted many researchers to label him the most antiscience president in living memory.”

Maybe so.  But when science is being used by policy makers to do stupid and destructive things, like locking down the economy, being antiscience is the intelligent choice.  What’s more, the World Health Organization now says it’s opposed to lockdowns, and told world leaders: “stop using lockdowns as your primary control method.”

We have a hunch that the science of lockdowns has little to do with stemming the spread of coronavirus.  We’ll have more on this in a moment.  But first, we must make an important distinction.  And to do so, we must take a brief diversion…

Private Acts of Madmen

Private and public life are as different as chalk and cheese.  They are both disposed to acts of madmen.  Sometimes these madmen apply science.  But in private life science is used with honest intentions; at the very least, with the aim of making a buck.  In public life, applications of science are far more sinister.

 » Lees verder

Assaulting Science in the Name of Science: Exploring the Coronavirus Crisis of 2020 – Global Research


08-10-20 03:37:00,

Many powerful interests have combined to argue that science justifies the government-led initiatives to impose, for instance, economic lockdowns, social distancing, mandatory masking, and a future of compulsory vaccines. A growing international movement of people, however, is coming to see that the impositions being done in the name of fighting COVID-19 are not scientific at all. Instead we are in the midst of a propaganda war aimed at inciting fear and even panic.

Josh Mitteldorf has written an illuminating essay about this struggle over who really speaks on behalf of the scientific method.  From his analysis he concludes, “never before 2020 have so few people with so little scientific credentials claimed to speak for the scientific community as a whole; and never has the public been asked to modify our daily lives and sacrifice our livelihoods on such a scale.” 

After describing “COVID-19 and the Perversion of Science,” Mitteldorf lists ten of the lies and deceptions pushed on us without the backing of scientific authority. Mitteldorf writes,

Here are ten messages that are essential pieces of the standard COVID narrative, but which are unfounded in actual science. Stay tuned for a detailed rebuttal of each.

1. “The origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was one of many random events in nature in which a virus jumps from one species to another.”

2. “Chloroquine kills patients and is too dangerous to use against COVID”

3. “The Ferguson model warned us of impending danger in time to take action and dodge a bullet.”

4. “American deaths from COVID: 200,000 and counting”

5. “New cases of COVID are expanding now in a dangerous Second Wave”

6. “Masks and social distancing are keeping the virus in check in our communities”

7. “Dr Fauci and the CDC are guiding our response to COVID according to the same principles of epidemic management that have protected public health in the past.

8. “Asymptomatic carriers are an important vector of disease transmission, which must be isolated if we are to stop the spread of COVID”


 » Lees verder

The science of the Son | Mieke Mosmuller


26-09-20 08:46:00,

Recitation in Arnhem on 20 November 2018

Part 4

That is a development that we have to go through. But the next step, after this diving into science and the longing for the lost spirituality, is to spiritualise the intelligence that we have been given as human beings. Then we will return in a rational way to occult science, occult philosophy, occult physiology, occult chemistry and physics.

It is clear that there is a strong counter-power that does everything possible to prevent this spiritualisation and to materialise and mechanise the intelligence.

We see how, in the course of history, counter-powers are at work in Christianity itself. This creates a division between exoteric and esoteric Christianity. In addition, there are, of course, forces coming from outside Christianity that want to strip what is actually the essence of Christianity of all its values in such a way that it can no longer exist.

Nature is the realm of the Father, the realm of necessity. We are born in the Father’s realm and find a necessity there, we find our destiny there. We find our family, our environment. Everything we find there belongs in the first place to the necessity of our earthly existence. We have no power to do anything against it. So you could say: what you inherit from the hereditary line of DNA, you have to deal with it in that sense.

It is, of course, well known that the DNA can be changed by certain circumstances. Medicine is also working on this in order to learn to manipulate the DNA in such a way that you can process healings by doing so, by exchanging a gene that has pathological effects for a healthy gene. But these are manipulations. In fact, the realm of nature is the realm of the Father, and we have to imagine that the DNA belongs there, in the extensive horizontal plane of the earth’s existence. Although, like everything else, it must be of cosmic origin. But the configuration is, of course, largely determined by that which comes from the hereditary line. And it really will come to a point where this can be mapped out very accurately and, as a result, the processes that take place during the inheritance of certain disorders from the parents to the children and how to avoid this and what can be expected.

 » Lees verder

Science Is Not About Consensus


28-08-20 06:52:00,

Authored by Jeff Harris via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

Newsflash; real science is based on facts not “consensus”.

I’m sick and tired of idiots beating me over the head with pseudoscience instead of sticking to the cold, hard facts.

Show me the hard data that standing six feet from someone is necessary.

Show me the hard data that wearing any old rag on my face is going to materially stop the spread of a virus.

Show me the hard data that enjoying fresh air and sunshine outdoors could be an invitation to an early death.

Please, stick to the facts and don’t dare lecture me about the “consensus” and here’s why.

Maybe you’ve heard of Ignaz Semmelweis, an Austrian-Hungarian obstetrician with a prickly personality. If not, you will quickly recognize his contribution to the medical profession with the three words he made famous:

“Wash your hands.”

This was way back in 1847.

Dr. Semmelweis provided hard data clearly demonstrating that once he and his staff began washing their hands and disinfecting equipment between patients the number of infections and deaths dropped dramatically.

Unfortunately, the scientific “consensus” at the time held that there was no benefit to these measures and his advice was almost completely ignored by the learned medical community. In fact, many of his medical peers were incensed with his suggestion that they could be responsible for transmitting illness and disease!

At the time doctors took pride in their soiled gowns as a mark of their industrious work! It was commonplace for doctors who had just completed an autopsy to go to the maternity ward and deliver babies without ever washing up! After all it was the “consensus” and with so many doctors in agreement how could they be wrong?

Dr. Semmelweis died in an insane asylum in 1865 knowing that untold numbers of patients had needlessly suffered and died because the medical community refused to accept his findings and instead chose to follow the “consensus”. Ironically, the same year Dr. Semmelweis died Dr. Joseph Lister,

 » Lees verder

Just the Science: List of Studies that Prove 5G and 4G Densification Is NOT Safe (and 3G Isn’t Safe Either) – Activist Post


18-06-20 08:55:00,

By B.N. Frank

“The Race for 5G” requires the densification of both 4G and 5G technology.  Opposition to this is worldwide.  Cities AND countries continue taking action against deployment.  This includes delaying and halting installation as well as issuing moratoriums (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9, 10).  In fact, doctors and scientists have been requesting moratoriums on 5G since 2017 on Earth as well as in space (see 1, 2, 3).

Nevertheless, there are still proponents in powerful positions who insist all of this is safe.  Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for providing an extensive list of research with web links that says otherwise:

Many people ask “Where is the scientific evidence? How do you know that 5G and the deployment of small cells (which usually is 4G) is not safe? Why do you say it is harmful?” 

The answer is that an ever growing and large body published research has found adverse effects from wireless radiation. Effects have been found at levels that are legal and permissible. 5G will use frequencies that are currently in use as well as higher frequencies never used in any widespread way.  

As stated in the Lancet, “This weight of scientific evidence refutes the prominent claim that the deployment of wireless technologies poses no health risks at the currently permitted non-thermal radiofrequency exposure levels. Instead, the evidence supports the International EMF Scientist Appeal by 244 scientists from 41 countries who have published on the subject in peer-reviewed literature and collectively petitioned the WHO and the UN for immediate measures to reduce public exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields and radiation.”

See examples of research clearly showing that wireless radiation and non ionizing electromagnetic fields  have biological effects. To state that 5G or 4G is safe is simply wrong. No such proof of safety exists.

Get facts about 5G here.

Read the science below.

 » Lees verder