The Solution to Social Media Censorship Is Simple


22-05-19 03:29:00,

Op-Ed by Atilla Sulker

Individuals from all corners of the political spectrum have been stirred up by the recent bans of various figures including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan. Some have praised these bans for providing good constraints on what they deem “fake news” or “hate speech.” Others have attacked these bans for being influenced by nefarious motives that are contra free speech. The debate regarding the extent to which social media sites may regulate speech has been going on for years now. Perhaps it is time for a reassessment.

The Fallacy of “Social Media Homogenization”

One of the biggest fallacies people fail to avoid in these debates is that all social media sites are homogenous goods. The successful entrepreneur understands the importance of differentiation in marketing their product, for it is differentiation that allows the entrepreneur to narrow down his market and attract consumers.

Just as in any other market, the social media titans, Facebook and Twitter, have developed very differently from each other, and each has its own distinctive features. Facebook has developed best for allowing like-minded people to connect with each other, while Twitter has become a bully pulpit for various figures in the political and pop culture world.

It would thus be wrong to compare all social media sites as if they were the same. The various consumer ends each social media site serves to satisfy determines its overall development. Many different factors will influence these ends. Among one of these factors is the extent to which speech is regulated.

If a given social media site aims to assist individuals and firms in networking with each other, they will likely not have any role in the market of sharing controversial opinions. Conversely, the social media platform that aims at giving a voice to those on the fringes of society will likely have no interest in entering the market of business networking. If we step back and look at the bigger picture, it is a fallacy to paint all social media sites with a broad brush stroke. Each one of them serves a unique purpose, and this purpose has a huge impact on how the site will develop in the longer run.

So perhaps the solution does not lie in calling for state interventions and boldly proclaiming that social media sites are ruthless monopolies trampling on free speech.

 » Lees verder

Are The Rise Of Social Media & The Decline Of Social Mobility Related?


05-04-19 08:14:00,

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Social media offers hope of achieving higher online social status without having to succeed financially in a winner-take-most economy.

I’ve often addressed the decline of social mobility and the addictive nature of social media, and recently I’ve entertained the crazy notion that the two dynamics are related. Why Is Social Media So Toxic?

I have long held that the decline of social mobility–broad-based opportunities to get ahead financially and socially–is part of a larger dynamic I call social depression: the social decay resulting from economic stagnation and the decline of social mobility and financial security. America’s Social Depression Is Accelerating

Japan offers a real-world 29-year lab experiment in the negative social consequences of economic stagnation, a top I addressed back in 2010: The Non-Financial Cost of Stagnation: “Social Recession” and Japan’s “Lost Generations”

The conventional explanation of social media’s addictive hold is that it activates the human brain’s reward circuits much like an addictive drug: in effect, we become addicted to being “liked” and to checking our phones hundreds of times a day to see if we received any “likes”.

This phenomenon is known as FOMO, fear of missing out: fear of missing out on some emotion-stimulating “news” or a “like” from someone in our network.

The innate addictive appeal of social media is pretty clear, but is that all that’s at work here?

Being social animals, humans naturally seek to identify their status in the pecking order and improve their position by whatever means are available as a way of increasing their reproductive success and their relative share of resources.

Traditional societies were bifurcated into a small elite and a much larger mass of commoners. As a general rule, social mobility was limited to those extraordinary commoners who were especially valuable to the ruling elite as soldiers, scribes, etc.

From its inception in the early 1800s, the American Dream was to acquire the “good life” via mass produced luxury goods. This has been the mainstay of the modern consumer economy, a consumption-based economy that became dependent on credit in the 20th century.

The downside of mass-produced luxury items (status symbols) is that in a credit-based economy,

 » Lees verder

Social Media, Universal Basic Income, & Cashless Society: How China’s Social Credit System Is Coming To America


17-03-19 09:05:00,

Authored by Brandon Turbeville via The Organic Prepper blog,

Some well-informed Americans may be aware of China’s horrifying “Social Credit System” that was recently unveiled as a method of eradicating any dissent in the totalitarian state. Essentially freezing out anyone who does not conform to the state’s version of the ideal citizen, the SCS is perhaps the most frightening control system being rolled out today. That is, until you consider what is coming next.

Unbeknownst to most people, there appears to be a real attempt to create a system in which all citizens are rationed their “wages” digitally each month in place of a paycheck, including the ability to gain or lose money. This system would see any form of dissent resulting in the cut off of those credits and the ability to work, eat, or even exist in society. It would not only be the end of dissent but of any semblance of real individuality.

Here’s how the Social Credit System operates in China.

First, however, for those who are unaware of the Social Credit System as it operates in China, we should briefly describe just what has taken place there. The Social Credit System in China isn’t merely a punishment for criticizing the state as is the case in most totalitarian regimes, the SCS can bring the hammer down for even the slightest infraction such as smoking in a non-smoking zone.

One summary of the SCS can be found in Business Insider’s article by Alexandra Ma entitled “China has started ranking citizens with a creepy ‘social credit’ system — here’s what you can do wrong, and the embarrassing, demeaning ways they can punish you,” where Ma writes,

The Chinese state is setting up a vast ranking system that will monitor the behavior of its enormous population, and rank them all based on their “social credit.”

The “social credit system,” first announced in 2014, aims to reinforce the idea that “keeping trust is glorious and breaking trust is disgraceful,” according to a government document.

The program is due to be fully operational nationwide by 2020, but is being piloted for millions of people across the country already.

 » Lees verder

Social Credit-System: Gestern China, heute Venezuela – morgen der Rest der Welt? |

18-12-18 07:51:00,

Als ich den ersten Artikel über das chinesische Sesame Credit-System (heute Social Credit) verfasste, schrieb man den 23.Dezember 2015. Ich schloß den damaligen Eintrag NWO: Der beste Weg der staatlichen Überwachung ist die Selbstkontrolle mit den Worten:

Einige Dinge mögen in diesem System des “Sesame Credit” erst in einigen Jahren vollständig implementiert sein und daher mag es seine wahre Effektivität noch verbergen können, aber es wird durch den Charakter der Selbstzensur und Selbstüberwachung das effektivste Instrument der Eliten sein, um ihre Stellung bewahren und ihre Vorstellung einer neuen Ordnung umsetzen zu können.

Und eines dürfte klar sein: es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit bis auch hier bei uns dieser feuchte Traum der Überwachungsjunkies und selbsternannten Eliten diskutiert und dann eingeführt wird.

Die staatlichen Begehrlichkeiten – auch in Europa – ein ähnliches System zu implementieren sind heute für jeden sichtbar, der es nur sehen will. Auch der Westen will lieber heute als morgen ein “Social Credit”-Bewertungssystem nach chinesischem Muster einführen, um jeden Bürger zu taxieren. Während Peking das Zieljahr 2020 ausgegeben hat, scheint eine “staatliche Bewertung des Verhalten eines Bürgers” in anderen Ländern noch in ferner Zukunft zu liegen. Aber ist es wirklich so, dass man nur in China ein System aktiv umsetzt, dass das Verhalten eines Menschen, das Befolgen von Regeln, das Abnicken staatlicher Propaganda, das kritiklose Dasein als “guter Bürger”, dass all das nur ein Traum der Kommunistischen Partei Chinas ist? Dass nur Peking das “Fehlverhalten seiner schlechten Bürger” (Besuch systemkritischer Websiten, gesellschaftliches politisches Engagement jenseits des Politwillens der Regierung, selbst das “Kennen von Menschen” mit einem niedrigen Social Credit-Wert) bestrafen will? Dass nur das Riesenreich Menschen ausschließen will, wenn diese nicht dem “entsprechen”, wie die Regierung ihre Bürger “haben will”, und sie bzw. ihre Kinder via Studienverbot an öffentlichen Universitäten, Arbeitsverbot in bestimmten Branchen, usw. entrechtet?

Sicherlich kann sich jeder vorstellen, dass dieses System weltweit von Regierungen beobachtet und als positiv empfunden wird. Mit Venezuela hat sich nun ein weiteres Land daran gemacht, sein sozialistisches Paradies mittels einer neuen Identifikationskarte umzusetzen, mit deren Hilfe man die Bürger und ihre Aktivitäten nachverfolgen und eine Datenbank befüllen kann.

 » Lees verder

How Social Media Is Becoming An Arm Of The State


25-11-18 10:05:00,

Authored by José Niño via The Mises Institute,

Say the wrong things and you might get kicked off of your favorite social media platform.

Tech titans Apple, Facebook, and YouTube have wiped out talk-show host Alex Jones’s social media presence on the Internet. But the social media crusades weren’t over.

Facebook recently took down popular pages like Liberty Memes and hundreds of other prominent libertarian-leaning pages . In the wake of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, social media network Gab was on the receiving end of suspensions from payment processors like PayPal and Stripe and cloud hosting company Joyent. Although these companies did not provide clear explanations for their dissociation with Gab, the media had a field day when they learned that the synagogue shooter, Robert Bowers, had an account with the social media network.

Should libertarians fear social media de-platforming? Or is this a case of private actors exercising their legitimate property rights by excluding those they wish to no longer do business with?

The Blurring Lines of the Public & Private Sector

Since the question of de-platforming has popped up, some conservatives have proposed state-based solutions to solve this problem. In a role reversal, conservative commentator Ann Coulter suggested that the governmentpass anti-discrimination laws to prevent social media platforms from de-platforming conservatives. Ideological consistency is a lot to ask for from seasoned veterans of Conservative Inc these days.

Nevertheless, Coulter expanded on why the 1st Amendment protections must be extended to social media:

We need to apply the First Amendment to social media companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, because it is a public square, and there is precedent for that and it’s gotta be done, because this is really terrifying, and talk about chilling speech when they’re just throwing people off right and left.

Although private entities are within their rights to decide with whom they do business, libertarians should not completely dismiss concerns about social media censorship. The first question we must ask: How separate from the State are these social media giants in the first place?

 » Lees verder

The Social Media Purge and How It Affects Everyone | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda

The Social Media Purge and How It Affects Everyone | Light On Conspiracies – Revealing the Agenda

25-09-18 08:34:00,

Just about every website owner I know is feeling personally victimized by the recent social media purge that has been going on.  But here’s an interesting fact: it isn’t, as is widely perceived, just conservative voices that are being silenced. It is dissenting voices.

It’s the voices of critical thinkers whose ideas run the gamut of philosophies who find that they no longer have much in the way of reach.

This social media purge affects everyone, even people who are not on social media. It does so in several ways:

  1. Dissenting information is silenced which stifles discussion
  2. Young people who are avid consumers of social media are being literally brainwashed because they only see one side of the story – any story
  3. The social media purge harms websites that post non-establishment information because it stamps out their ability to reach readers who would be interested in their content.
  4. The unfairly biased search results show people who are trying to learn more about a topic only one side of the information.

You don’t have to be on a Twitter feed to see how this is an overwhelmingly anti-American problem. Like it or not, social media is a monumental source of information these days, and when it’s censored to only show one point of view, the future of our republic is in peril. We are well on our way to peak censorship and this has been carefully orchestrated.

Non-establishment websites are in trouble.

Their website traffic is plummeting because they no longer show up anywhere near the top of search results. Their posts on social media are not presented to the public – or even the people who deliberately opted to “follow” them.  Here’s an example from my own page. I have more than 30K people who chose to follow my page, as you can see in the top image. But in the bottom image, you can see how many of those people were actually shown my post. And this was actually a more successful one than many.

And the same thing goes for social media like Twitter too. I have an email list and if I didn’t, I’d hardly reach anyone.

 » Lees verder

Are big social media companies being used to advance the New World Order’s agenda?

Are big social media companies being used to advance the New World Order’s agenda?

27-07-18 01:01:00,

When they were first created, these social media platforms were essentially neutral, and they really did greatly contribute to the marketplace of ideas. But now there is a tremendous effort to censor voices that are a threat to the establishment, and in recent months we have witnessed the greatest purge of conservative voices in the history of the Internet.

Support The Duran – Browse our Shop

Anything that does not conform to the agenda of the elite is being labeled as “hate speech”, and countless anti-establishment voices have had social media accounts either “shadow-banned” or terminated completely. Needless to say, this could dramatically affect the outcome of the elections in November.

And it isn’t just political voices that are being silenced. As you will see at the end of this article, Facebook has been shutting down dozens and dozens of alternative health pages.

Why would they do that?

Well, the New World Order absolutely hates when people start questioning conventional medicine, vaccines and the giant pharmaceutical companies. Rather than engaging in legitimate debate, they would rather shut down dissenting voices instead.

Before the Internet came along, the elite had a virtual monopoly over the flow of information in our society. They owned all of the television networks, radio stations, newspapers, magazines, publishing houses, etc.

But then the Internet happened, and all of a sudden ordinary people like you and I could communicate with one another on a mass scale without having to go through the gatekeepers. It was a wonderful thing, but we all knew that it wouldn’t be like that forever.

We can debate the extent to which the globalists are directly pulling the strings at these social media companies behind the scenes, but the end result of all of this censorship is evident to all of us. Anti-establishment voices are being silenced, and the agenda of the New World Order is being advanced.

At this point, the censorship of anti-establishment voices is so obvious that even liberal news outlets are reporting on it. The following comes from Vice News

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter,

 » Lees verder

Social Impact Bonds: disciplineringssysteem tegen mensen aan de onderkant van de samenleving

Social Impact Bonds: disciplineringssysteem tegen mensen aan de onderkant van de samenleving

11-07-18 09:16:00,

Ben jij baanloos, bijstandsgerechtigd, ongediplomeerd schoolverlater, dakloos, vluchteling, ernstig ziek, schuldenaar of ex-gedetineerd? Dan is de kans groot dat je gedurende je schuldhulp, inburgering of reïntegratie voor een bank, zoals de Rabobank, een zorgverzekeraar, zoals het CZ, of een subsidiefonds, zoals het Oranje Fonds, moet werken. En nee, de financiële opbrengsten gaan niet naar jou of naar een collectieve pot, maar via de overheid naar particuliere kapitaalbezitters. Dit proces van zogeheten Social Impact Bonds is gestaag in opmars. Tegen deze privatisering en kapitalisering en tegen de verdergaande disciplinering van arm gemaakte mensen dienen we ons met hand en tand te verzetten.

(Door Bart de Baan en Puk Pent, oorspronkelijk verschenen bij Doorbraak, illustratie: Voorkant van een brochure van ABN AMRO)

Bij het uitpluizen van de uitbuitconstructie Flextensie zien we dat de Rabobank Foundation onder andere in Zaandam het een en ander voorfinanciert. We staan daar niet zo bij stil totdat eind januari 2018 de gemeente Veldhoven met veel bombarie een Social Impact Bond (SIB) aankondigt: “Investeerders financieren de inburgering van statushouders”. De Rabobank Foundation blijkt ook dit project te voorfinancieren. Vluchtelingen die moeten inburgeren, blijken daartoe zo goed als zelf een speciaal opgerichte “startup” te moeten draaien. Deze constructie wordt in de mainstream alom geprezen: “Wat goed, zeg, het bedrijfsleven gaat doen wat de zich terugtrekkende overheid nalaat…”. Ook D66-minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid Wouter Koolmees ziet wel brood in deze en andere SIBs.

In maart 2018 brengt de gemeente Venlo naar buiten dat er “de komende twee jaar 50 bijstandsgerechtigden met een grote afstand tot de arbeidsmarkt” aan een baan worden ‘geholpen’ in een constructie met de ‘sociale’ onderneming Rendiz. Uiteraard rinkelen de alarmbellen bij deze aankondiging van een tewerkstellingsproject én de vermelding van de Rabobank Foundation. En jawel, daar is die Impact Bond weer.

Wat is een Social Impact Bond (SIB)?

Een onderneming of organisatie ‘krijgt’ geld van private investeerders (banken en fondsen), al dan niet na een aanbestedingsprocedure waarin een ondernemer het inhoudelijke deel van een SIB bedenkt. Met dat geld gaat een lokaal of landelijk overheidssproject worden uitgevoerd, met een gemiddelde looptijd van twee tot vijf jaar en bedoeld voor mensen aan de onderkant van de samenleving.

 » Lees verder

Social Activism Funded by Global Capitalism, Serves the Neoliberal World Order. The 2018 World Social Forum (WSF) in Salvador, Brazil | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

Social Activism Funded by Global Capitalism, Serves the Neoliberal World Order. The 2018 World Social Forum (WSF) in Salvador, Brazil | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

29-03-18 07:04:00,

At the World Social Forum in Salvador de Bahia, thousands of people took to the streets “in the name of democracy”: the women’s movement, Black Lives Matter, Environmentalists, Indigenous People’s Organizations, the Landless Farmers Movement, Youth Organizations, Students, LGBT, among others.

As part of the 13th World Social Forum they marched to the slogan:

“Resist is to Create. Resist is to Transform”  
“Resistir É Criar, Resistir É Transformar” 


My question:

Resist Whom?

The leaders and organizers of the WSF in Salvador, Brazil are in persistent denial;  surely by now they should acknowledge that the WSF venue –including travel expenses– are funded by the same corporate interests which are the object of widespread political and social “RESISTANCE” and dissent. 

How convenient. The corporations are funding dissent with a view to controlling dissent and the WSF organizers are complicit.

“The anti-globalization movement is opposed to Wall Street and the Texas oil giants controlled by Rockefeller, et al. Yet the foundations and charities of Ford, Rockefeller et al will generously fund progressive anti-capitalist networks as well as environmentalists (opposed to Wall Street and Big Oil), etc. with a view to ultimately overseeing and shaping their various activities.” (M. C, 2016)

The WSF is said to have transformed progressive movements, leading to what is described as the emergence of the “Global Left”. Nonsense. Real progressive movements have been shattered, largely as a result of the funding of dissent.

What is this Global Left, does it have a grassroots movement?

It is largely composed of  “Leftist Intellectuals” and “Organizers”. They say they are fighting Neoliberalism.

But their WSF movement is largely “funded by neoliberalism”. .

People who participated in the WSF Venue

did not know that “RESIST” GLOBAL CAPITALISM  

is funded by “GLOBAL CAPITALISM”.

They have been misled by the WSF organizers. 

In other words, while the WSF Resist to Transform logo is meaningful, in practice it is also redundant.

Colonial Reparations were contemplated at the World Social Forum 2018, meeting in Salvador, Brazil

The theme of reparations at the 2018 World Social Forum in Salvador de Bahia was treated in the workshop Repairs to Colonialism,

 » Lees verder

170 Social Leaders Killed in Colombia in 2017: Report | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

170 Social Leaders Killed in Colombia in 2017: Report | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

09-01-18 09:20:00,

The landmark handshake between Juan Manuel Santos and Timoshenko, with two helping hands from Cuban President Raul Castro. (Justice for Colombia).

An estimated 170 Colombian social leaders were killed in 2017, up from 117 in 2016, according to the Institute of Studies for Peace Development, Indepaz, a Colombian non-governmental organization.

“The rise in homicides is over two main conflicts: (access to) land and (natural) resources. This latter refers to the rentiership in illegal mining and cultivation of illicit crops,” said Indepaz director Camilo Gonzalez Posso.

The report indicated that the murders are highly localized to four regional departments: Nariño (28), Antioquia (23), Valle (14) and Choco (12). There were 32 assassinations alone in the community of San Jose de Apartado Cauca located in Antioquia.

Posso added that the community leader killings in Cauca, Nariño and Choco are related to land conflicts, while those in Bajo Cauca are related to illegal mining.

“The majority of the killings are committed by armed men in areas where previously the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) used to rule.”

Leonardo Gonzalez, also of Indepaz, said that as the FARC left these territories, killings have increased.

The FARC began as a Marxist guerrilla movement in 1960s that advocated for peasant access to farmland. It gained the support of peasants and activists in rural areas over the past several decades. The administration of President Juan Manuel Santos eventually reached an accord with the FARC in November 2016, which included the group’s disarmament. Since the FARC’s leaving, violent right-wing paramilitaries have taken over.

“Where the (FARC) left, other paramilitaries … have arrived to take over the territories, by force”, Gonzalez said.

Maribel Perafan, the country’s Secretary of Government, said that the government is prioritizing the investigation into the 170 deaths. She said it’s necessary to “institutionalize” the protection of the human rights and social leaders.

Yet, social rights defenders in these areas have no guarantees, contended Modesto Serna from the Choco government. He said that the FARC’s leaving has left a vacuum, which hasn’t been replaced by the state, but “criminal gangs.” “We can’t fool ourselves,” he said of those who deny this is the scenario in Colombia.

The government created the National Protection Unity, UNP, after the historic agreement was reached to protect against potential threats and killings of social rights leaders in Colombia.

 » Lees verder